Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Quinn, Casey

Publications and source records attributed to Quinn, Casey.

Ocpp 2.0.1. Interim Kpi Calculator

The project is split into four pieces. The first is a raw OCPP log parser. The second is a file splitter. The third is a message parser. The final piece is the Interim KPI calculator. The OCPP log parser was created from two different formats of raw OCPP 2.0.1 data. Its intended purpose is to extract device IDs and OCPP event messages from nontabular text logs. The parser looks for specific substrings in the logs to identify which of the two "standards" it should select from. The KPI generator does not perform any of its calculations in parallel. Instead, we opt for a naive batching approach. The splitter takes the file generated from the parser and creates many smaller files for each of the device IDs in the dataset. This allows the pandas queries in the log formatter to be iterate over a significantly smaller slice of data, increasing performance significantly. The message parser step takes messages from each of the files (containing distinct device IDs) and breaks the message out into pieces. The final result is a file with different columns specifying different attributes of the JSON message. The file is an aggregation of all different devices. This is the most complex portion of the code. The KPI calculator takes the parsed messages, as a single file, and calculates the KPI from that data. An excel file is produced with four sheets. These contain the metrics for Session Success, Charge Start Success, Charge End Success, and Charge Start Time. It includes the metrics for the different equations in the Interim KPI Implementation Guide as well as a weighted sum of the different equations for each KPI (excluding Charge End Success and Charge Start Time).

Quinn, Casey↗

Economic feasibility of in-motion wireless power transfer in a high-density traffic corridor

Electricity is expected to become a dominant power source in the transportation sector, but under a stationary recharging model, electric powered vehicles still suffer some disadvantages relative to conventional vehicles. Recent developments in wireless power transfer (WPT) technology can enable an alternative vehicle recharging model wherein power is supplied to vehicles while they are moving, mitigating the need for charging stops and high-capacity on-board energy storage. One of the greatest concerns associated with dynamic WPT is that the required infrastructure costs would be prohibitively high; however, the life-cycle costs and benefits of such a system have been under-researched. Here in this work, we apply a systems-level assessment to a case study of a WPT charging system located on the densely trafficked I-710 corridor in Los Angeles, California. Detailed cost estimates for electronics and implementation, high-fidelity energy consumption modeling, and survey-derived adoption projections are applied to evaluate scenarios of economic feasibility and environmental impact. Results show that a “1st-of-a-kind” system can achieve a payback in 20 years while maintaining operating cost advantages relative to petroleum fueling. System economics are shown to improve substantially with “nth-of-a-kind” capital costs. Discussion focuses on the effect of uptake trajectory on economic viability and detailed economics outcomes for light duty and heavy duty vehicles.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗