Understanding the Design Space of Sparse/Dense Multiphase Dataflows for Mapping Graph Neural Networks on Spatial Accelerators.
Abstract not provided.
Garg, Raveesh↗
Engineering topics
Qin, Eric
Publications and source records attributed to Qin, Eric.
Understanding the Design Space of Sparse/Dense Multiphase Dataflows for Mapping Graph Neural Networks on Spatial Accelerators
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have garnered a lot of recent interest because of their success in learning representations from graph-structured data across several critical applications in cloud and HPC. Owing to their unique compute and memory characteristics that come from an interplay between dense and sparse phases of computations, the emergence of reconfigurable dataflow (aka spatial) accelerators offers promise for acceleration by mapping optimized dataflows (i.e., computation order and parallelism) for both phases. The goal of this work is to characterize and understand the design-space of dataflow choices for running GNNs on spatial accelerators in order for the compilers to optimize the dataflow based on the workload. Specifically, we propose a taxonomy to describe all possible choices for mapping the dense and sparse phases of GNNs spatially and temporally over a spatial accelerator, capturing both the intra-phase dataflow and the inter-phase (pipelined) dataflow. Using this taxonomy, we do deep-dives into the cost and benefits of several dataflows and perform case studies on implications of hardware parameters for dataflows and value of flexibility to support pipelined execution.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
A Taxonomy for Classification and Comparison of Dataflows for GNN Accelerators
Recently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have received a lot of interest because of their success in learning representations from graph structured data. However, GNNs exhibit different compute and memory characteristics compared to traditional Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Graph convolutions require feature aggregations from neighboring nodes (known as the aggregation phase), which leads to highly irregular data accesses. GNNs also have a very regular compute phase that can be broken down to matrix multiplications (known as the combination phase). All recently proposed GNN accelerators utilize different dataflows and microarchitecture optimizations for these two phases. Different communication strategies between the two phases have been also used. However, as more custom GNN accelerators are proposed, the harder it is to qualitatively classify them and quantitatively contrast them. In this work, we present a taxonomy to describe several diverse dataflows for running GNN inference on accelerators. This provides a structured way to describe and compare the design-space of GNN accelerators.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Extending Sparse Tensor Accelerators to Support Multiple Compression Formats.
Abstract not provided.
Qin, Eric↗