Engineering topics

Plotkowski, Alex

Publications and source records attributed to Plotkowski, Alex.

6 records

DOE OSTI2024

A dynamic volumetric heat source model for laser additive manufacturing

Melt pool scale models of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) offer insights into the process-structure-property relationships in additive manufacturing (AM). These models often neglect physical phenomena such as vapor cavity formation and fluid mechanics to reduce computational demands. Instead, volumetric heat source models are used to represent the effects that these phenomena have on the predicted melt pool dimensions. Generally, the dimensions and effective absorption of the volumetric heat source are calibrated to reproduce melt pool dimensions observed in metallographic cross sections taken from single-track experiments on bare plate. However, the transient nature of LPBF often deviates the melt pool dimensions from the assumed steady-state conditions of single-track experiments, motivating the need for a volumetric heat source model that more generally considers the dynamic relationship between melt pool shape and laser-material interactions. Here, we introduce a two-parameter volumetric heat source model that integrates several existing models into a generalized mathematical expression, providing independent control over the radial heat distribution via the parameter k and the volumetric shape of the heat source via the parameter m. This parameterization enables the calibration of melt pool shape predictions through simultaneous adjustment of these parameters, while keeping the radial heat source dimensions consistent with the experimental spot size (D4σ) and constraining the heat source depth and absorption to physically derived expressions for cavities. Consequently, the proposed volumetric heat source model adapts to changes in the local melt pool conditions due to scanning strategy and part geometry by dynamically adjusting the heat source depth and absorption. We demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed model through comparisons with a collection of experiments from the Additive Manufacturing Benchmark (AMBench).

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2024

Phase Selection During Solidification and Solid-State Phase Transformations in an Al-10Ce-8Mn (wt pct) Alloy

In multicomponent Al-Ce alloys, and especially after additive manufacturing (AM), complex and metastable solidification microstructures are frequently observed. Here, in this research, the relationship between solidification conditions and phase selection are explored for an Al-10Ce-8Mn (wt pct) alloy using a systematic study of laser melting conditions. Three solidification modes were observed: primary Al 10 Mn 2 Ce; primary Al 20 Mn 2 Ce; and eutectic FCC Al + Al 20 Mn 2 Ce. These solidification modes were correlated to specific liquid-solid interface velocities using a simple thermal model, showing the change in primary solidification phase for low (< 6.8 × 10 −4 m/s), moderate (between 8.2 × 10 −4 and 5.9 × 10 −2 m/s) and high solidification velocities (> 6.2 x 10 −2 m/s) for the above three solidification microstructures, respectively. These results were rationalized by using interface response function (IRF) theory to describe the solidification undercooling for the possible primary intermetallic phases. The implication of the local phase selection from differing solidification conditions is summarized by a comparison of hardness which demonstrates the potential variance of Vickers hardness from 101 to 242 (VHV) by changing the laser velocity from 1 to 83 mm/s. Interestingly, on heat treatment at 400°C, the decomposition pathways of the solidification microstructure and hardness were also found to be different, thereby opening multiple pathways for spatial microstructure and property control within AM components.

Sisco, Kevin↗

DOE OSTI2024

Improving Additive Manufactured Component Performance through Multi-Scale Microstructure Simulation and Process Optimization

The purpose of this project was to utilize computational tools to understand the relationships between processing, microstructure, and properties for additively manufactured (AM) aluminum alloys for automotive applications, and to provide an engineering solution for helping to optimize process conditions. The project leverages ORNL developments in computational modeling, including AM process modeling, phase-field based microstructure evolution predictions, and data analytics techniques for mapping process conditions to material outcomes. The project utilized an Al-Cu-Mn-Zr alloy as a model material for studying formation of defects and microstructural features in response to variations in process conditions. Based on both pre-existing experimental data and simulation results, statistical process maps were constructed to identify regions of process space with minimal defect formation and advantageous microstructures and properties. The software tools used for this purpose were successful disseminated to GM, who were able to successful compile the relevant HPC codes within their own computing ecosystem and perform initial calculations to reproduce ORNL results.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2024

Dual X-ray computed tomography-aided classification of melt pool boundaries and flaws in crept additively manufactured parts

In metal additive manufacturing (AM), understanding the process-structure-performance relationships requires a combination of multi-scale characterization techniques that allows for the measurement of the melt pool shape and boundary and classifying various defects and flaws in the AM parts. Such approaches can be destructive, only 2D in nature, or have a small field of view and can be complex to co-register and analyze. Here, in this work, we present a non-destructive 3D inspection technique that employs dual-energy X-ray computed tomography (XCT) along with a model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and a new segmentation algorithm. The proposed approach and algorithm are not only capable of classifying and quantifying flaws such as pores, cracks, and inclusions, but they also allow for the extraction of microstructural features such as melt pool boundaries (MPB) and melt pool regions (MPR), that can help understand process-structure-performance relationships for alloys under study. As an exemplar application, we employed the method for characterization of an additively manufactured aluminum alloy crept under tensile stress at 300 °C for 1064 h. Our results demonstrate high quality segmentation and classification of various flaws and MPB and MPR, for the first time, using 3D X-ray CT inspection. The delineated MPB and MPR in the crept samples reveal the preferential growth paths of cracks that formed during creep deformation. The technique was used for successfully quantifying the characteristics (number of defects, their density, volume fraction, etc.) of the manufacturing-induced pores and creep-induced cracks, which is necessary to better understand the creep failure mechanisms of the material.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2024

Equilipy: a python package for calculating phase equilibria

The CALPHAD (CALculation of PHAse Diagram) approach (Nigel Saunders & Miodownik, 1998) provides predictions for thermodynamically stable phases in multicomponent-multiphase materials across a wide range of temperatures. Consequently, the CALPHAD calculations became an essential tool in materials and process design (Luo, 2015). Such design tasks frequently require navigating a high-dimensional space due to multiple components involved in the system. This increasing complexity demands high-throughput CALPHAD calculations, especially in the rapidly evolving field of alloy design. In response to the need, we developed Equilipy an open-source Python package designed for calculating phase equilibria of multicomponent-multiphase systems. Equilipy is specifically tailored for high-throughput CALPHAD calculations, offering parallel computations across multiple processors and nodes with the given NPT input conditions namely elemental compositions (N), pressure (P), and temperature (T). Equilipy utilizes the program structure and Gibbs energy functions from the Fortran-based program, Thermochimica (Piro et al., 2013), with incorporating a new Gibbs energy minimization algorithm. This algorithm, originally developed by Capitani and Brown in 1987 (Capitani & Brown, 1987), has been revised and implemented to enhance the stability and performance of calculations. The Fortran codes are precompiled and interfaced with Python via F2PY, ensuring high computation speed. Benchmark tests shown in Figure 1 demonstrate that Equilipy’s computation speed is comparable to those of established commercial software, TC-Python and PanPython. This result highlights its efficiency and potential applications in various scientific and industrial fields.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2024

Preliminary Results on Process Modeling Tools for Determining Variability in Additively Manufactured Stainless Steel 316 Parts

The Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies program aims to accelerate the development, qualification, demonstration, and deployment of advanced materials and manufacturing technologies to enable reliable and economical nuclear energy. However, the distinct characteristics of additive manufacturing (AM) materials, stemming from their unique processing history, microstructure, and properties, pose significant challenges for the qualification and certification of nuclear components. These challenges primarily arise from component-scale variations in microstructure and properties influenced by local process conditions and geometry, which affect thermal history, melt pool dynamics, and microstructure evolution. Computational modeling tools can play a crucial role in predicting and controlling this variability. This report presents preliminary results on process modeling tools designed to predict microstructure variability in additively manufactured stainless steel 316 parts. It details the software packages and physical modeling approaches employed to simulate an AM component within an automated process modeling workflow. Initial results are demonstrated through comparisons between predicted microstructures and experimental measurements across various representative processing conditions. The report concludes by discussing the challenges inherent in process modeling of AM components and outlines a plan for future development needs.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗