Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Pivovar, Bryan (ORCID:0000000151815363)

Publications and source records attributed to Pivovar, Bryan (ORCID:0000000151815363).

8 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Opportunities and Implications for Low-Cost Hydrogen Production from Water Electrolysis in a Decarbonizing Power Sector

Increased deployment of renewable power generation such as wind and solar photovoltaics along with electrification of transportation and other sectors are driving changes in the operation and economics of the electric power sector. Simultaneously, efforts to decarbonize other sectors of the economy such as steelmaking and heavy duty transportation will require significant amounts of electricity to drive electrons to molecules processes. Hydrogen production via water splitting electrolysis is a key near-term technology for decarbonization that interfaces between the power sector and decarbonization efforts in industrial sectors. This poster examines the implications for increased deployment of water electrolyzers in a rapidly evolving energy system. The economic opportunities for low-cost hydrogen production from electrolysis that are facilitated by highly renewable grids will be examined and discussed. Durability, cost, and operational strategies for electrolyzers interacting in these future energy systems are key to enabling hydrogen at scale. This poster will overview these considerations and ongoing work within the U.S. Department of Energy’s H2NEW consortium that is focused on addressing them.

electrolysis↗
DOE OSTI2024

Performance Losses and Current-Driven Recovery from Cation Contaminants in PEM Water Electrolysis

Water contaminants are a common cause of failure for polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) electrolyzers in the field as well as a confounding factor in research on cell performance and durability. In this study, we investigated the performance impacts of feed water containing representative tap water cations at concentrations ranging from 0.5–500 μ M, with conductivities spanning from ASTM Type II to tap-water levels. We present multiple diagnostic signatures to help identify the presence of contaminants in PEM electrolysis cells. Through analysis of polarization curves and impedance spectroscopy to understand the origins of performance losses, we found that a switch from the acidic to alkaline hydrogen evolution mechanism is a key factor in contaminated cell behavior. Finally, we demonstrated that this mechanism switching can be harnessed to remove cation contaminants and recover cell performance without the use of an acid wash. We demonstrated near-complete recovery of cells contaminated with sodium and calcium, and partial recovery of a cell contaminated with iron, which was further investigated by post-mortem microscopy. The improved understanding of contaminant impacts from this work can inform development of strategies to mitigate or recover performance losses as well as improve the consistency and rigor of electrolysis research.

30 DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION↗
DOE OSTI2024

HydroGEN Overview: A Consortium on Advanced Water Splitting Materials

HydroGEN (https://www.h2awsm.org/) Energy Materials Network (EMN) is an U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) EERE Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office (HFTO)-funded consortium that aims to accelerate the discovery and development of advanced water splitting materials (AWSM) for clean, low-cost hydrogen production. This is in line with the H2@Scale initiative (https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/h2-scale), with the goal to meet U.S. DOE's Hydrogen Shot production cost target of $1/kg H2 within 1 decade. Materials innovations are key to enhancing performance, durability, and cost of hydrogen generation technologies. Large scale, low cost hydrogen from diverse domestic resources can enable an economically competitive and environmentally beneficial future energy system across multiple sectors. HydroGEN is focused on low technology readiness level AWS technologies, including low- (alkaline exchanged membrane electrolysis) and high-temperature electrolysis (proton-conducting solid oxide electrolysis), photoelectrochecmical (PEC) and solar thermochemical (STCH) water splitting. This presentation will provide an overview of the HydroGEN EMN and technical highlights of a few lab-led and FOA-awarded R&D projects. HydroGEN continues to grow its community of industry, university, and national laboratories, forming a national innovation ecosystem focused on renewable hydrogen production.

clean hydrogen↗
DOE OSTI2024

Ultrathin Microporous Transport Layers: Implications for Low Catalyst Loadings, Thin Membranes, and High Current Density Operation for Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis

Porous transport layers (PTL) and their surface properties have the potential to improve the performance of proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers (PEMWE), which is imperative to reduce feedstock costs and lead to their widespread implementation. This work introduces a novel generation of titanium microporous layers (MPLs) with ultra-low thicknesses of approx. 20 um which reduces raw material costs. They also feature advanced interfacial properties tailored to maximize catalyst utilization at low Ir-loadings. The bulk morphology and surface properties of the hierarchically structured PTLs are assessed by X-ray tomographic microscopy. The low surface roughness of the MPL allows the use of thinner membranes since it minimizes possible deformations in the membrane. Cells containing the MPLs outperformed those containing state-of-the-art commercially available PTL materials by up to 100 mV at 7 A cm-2 in combination with low-loaded catalyst-coated membranes of 0.4 mgIr cm-2. Hydrogen crossover is also reduced, especially at low current densities, leading to a larger turndown ratio which can enable more cost-effective operating strategies. Finally, these rationally designed MPLs also lead to high catalyst utilization by overcoming the naturally occurring high in-plane resistance of low-loaded catalyst layers.

hydrogen crossover↗
DOE OSTI2023

Clean Hydrogen Production: A Consortium Approach

Comprehensive, concerted efforts supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office (HFTO) are advancing research and development to demonstrate clean hydrogen production and industrial decarbonization pathways. These pathways enable an economically competitive and environmentally beneficial future energy system across sectors and can address specific applications that are difficult to decarbonize. We bridge technologies with other research areas across NREL and through multiple DOE and national lab research initiatives, consortia, and collaborations including: H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water Consortium and HydroGEN: Advanced Water Splitting Materials Consortium, to advance the H2@Scale vision.

clean hydrogen↗
DOE OSTI2023

Decarbonization of the Electric Power Sector and Implications for Low-Cost Hydrogen Production from Water Electrolysis

Increasing development of wind and solar generation in the power sector can create economic opportunities for the deployment of water electrolyzers that produce hydrogen. Temporal variation in the marginal cost of energy in future decarbonized grids can make it favorable for electrolyzers to dispatchably ramp hydrogen production up and down in response to low- and high-cost times. Using this strategy, low-cost hydrogen production is enabled by electrolyzers that are low-capital cost and tolerant to frequent on/off cycling. Ramping down hydrogen production to a designated turndown ratio can avoid performance degradation caused by on/off cycling by not shutting the electrolyzer completely off. This comes with a slight cost penalty which can be minimized if the turndown ratio is low (i.e., the system ramps down hydrogen production to close to zero). These results suggest that electrolyzers integrated into future power systems are likely to benefit from the ability to ramp operation up and down quickly and operate in a standby mode. This analysis forms a basis for comparative tradeoffs between electrolyzer capital cost, operating strategy, and system durability and demonstrates the importance of considering all three factors in technoeconomic analysis.

capital cost↗