Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Pidaparti, Sandeep.
OBSOLETE CCRD - SUPERSEDED<p>This carbon capture retrofit database (CCRD) model allows users to evaluate the cost of carbon capture on industrial sources (ammonia, cement, ethanol, hydrogen, and natural gas processing). The model was created by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) based on the technical report titled Cost of Capturing CO2 from Industrial Sources (NETL/DOE-2022/3319). Revised 12/21/22.</p>
This NETL presentation of recent updates to CO2 capture retrofits of a variety of industrial point sources was given at the 2022 Clearwater Clean Energy Conference. Presentation covers cost and performance results of Ammonia, Cement and Iron/Steel cases as well as some sensitivity results.
This systems analysis by the National Energy Technology Laboratory's Strategic Systems Analysis and Engineering directorate) evaluates the cost and performance impacts of capturing CO 2 emissions from nine industrial sources (ammonia, ethylene oxide, and ethanol production, natural gas process, coal- and gas-to-liquids, refinery hydrogen production, iron and steel, and cement manufacturing). The industrial sectors examined are segregated according to the CO 2 purity level of the flue gas stream, prior to treatment. Certain sectors naturally produce a gas stream that is inherently high in CO 2 purity, and these sectors can achieve 99-100% removal. Other sectors produce a lower purity CO 2 flue gas stream and achieving 90-99% removal requires deeper levels of treatment, adding cost. In addition to the report that documents the analysis, a Carbon Capture Retrofit Database tool was also created that allows users to apply CO 2 capture to selected industries, to evaluate the cost of capture and compare across multiple plants, as well as across different industries. Users have the ability to change select input parameters (such as fuel price, capture rate, and financing assumptions) to evaluate the impact on industrial CO 2 capture economics.
This report presents the techno-economic analysis (TEA) optimization results of natural gas-fired utility-scale power plants based on the direct supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO 2 ) power cycle. To identify optimum plant configuration, the study also considered three different cases (Case A, Case B, Case C) with varying levels of thermal integration with the plant air separation unit (ASU). A fourth case (Case D), which is based on a patent from 8 Rivers, was also considered and includes thermal integration with the ASU as well as compressed recycle carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) gas. The four direct sCO 2 power plants offered similar or slightly higher plant efficiencies than the reference NGCC plants based on an F-class gas turbine with carbon capture and storage (CCS). LCOE of the direct sCO 2 plants is 13.5–17.2 percent higher than the reference NGCC plants with CCS due to higher capital costs associated with the ASU and sCO 2 power block. Recuperators make up over 50 percent of the power cycle costs. Consequently, any research and development (R&D) efforts to reduce the recuperator capital costs will be beneficial for the technology commercialization. The study also investigated the impact of co-firing landfill gas (LFG) and natural gas on plant efficiency, LCOE, and CO 2 emissions. Increasing the LFG co-firing from 0 percent to 50 percent (mass basis), decreased the plant efficiency by 0.3 percentage points and increased the LCOE by 3 percent. Due to high inherent CO 2 capture rates, direct sCO 2 plants have strong potential to achieve net-zero CO 2 emissions with LFG and natural gas co-firing.
This presentation given at the 2021 ASME Turbo Expo (GT2021-58865) summarizes the techno-economic global optimization results of coal-fired utility scale power plants based on indirect sCO2 power cycles with and without carbon capture and storage (CCS).
This study presents the impact of plant siting on the performance and economics of coal-fired utility scale power plants based on indirect sCO2 power cycles with carbon capture and storage (CCS). Presentation of paper made at the 2021 ASME Turbo Expo, GT2021-58867.
Presentation for the 2021 Clearwater Clean Energy Conference on Techno-Economic Analysis of an Indirect sCO2 Cycle for Natural Gas Combined Cycles (NGCCs)
This NETL report presents the techno-economic analysis (TEA) optimization results of coal-fired utility-scale power plants based on the indirect supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO 2 ) power cycles both with and without carbon capture and storage (CCS). For the plants without CCS, the heat source is an air-fired circulating fluidized bed (CFB). For plants with CCS, the heat source is an oxy-fired CFB. Four power cycle configurations were examined for this study: recompression cycle (RC) without and with reheat turbine (“RC without reheat” and “RC with reheat”), and partial cooling cycle (PCC) without and with reheat turbine (“PCC without reheat” and “PCC with reheat”).
This U.S. Department of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory techno-economic analysis evaluates those parameters having the greatest performance and cost impact on wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) effluent wastewater treatment systems, and air cooled condensers for dry cooling systems. Two supercritical pulverized coal power plants are considered: 1) an existing plant (modified for surface water discharge and air emissions consistent with limits for existing plants) retrofitted with wet FGD effluent wastewater treatment and 2) a greenfield plant constructed with an air-cooled condenser (ACC). Sensitivity analyses are completed on various process parameters associated with the wet FGD effluent wastewater treatment system and ACC to determine the impact on the net plant efficiency and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). Research and development targets are recommended for the parameters shown to have the greatest potential impact on cost or performance.
This NETL report presents the results of a techno-economic analysis (TEA) of a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant utilizing supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO 2 ) as the working fluid in the bottoming cycle for waste heat recovery (WHR).