Advanced Metallic Fuselage Cost Study
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Peter Frederic.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An electrified aircraft propulsion (EAP) design exploration study was performed to determine the impact of EAP technologies on a set of regional transport aircraft concepts. A range of aircraft sizes and types were assessed, including 18, 48, and 70 passenger turboprops, as well as 50 and 78 passenger turbofan aircraft configurations. A previous paper discussed the approaches, technology assumptions, and tools used to carry out the design exploration. The study team designed a series of baseline and advanced EAP aircraft concepts based on existing reference aircraft in the fleet. We then conducted a set of parametric trade studies on the EAP aircraft to better understand the design and performance implications of EAP. This paper documents results from the trade studies, including battery weight versus motor size, climb hybrid power versus cruise hybrid power, and range vs. battery specific energy. Assuming a 500 W-hr/kg battery specific energy, the turboprop aircraft demonstrated a significant fuel savings and modest energy savings. The turbofan aircraft demonstrated no fuel or energy benefits from electrification. In addition, operating cost results are presented on the most promising EAP designs. The cost analysis revealed that the EAP aircraft concepts were not competitive with their baselines, mainly due to the additional depreciation and interest cost for the much heavier and more expensive EAP aircraft.
A previous electrified aircraft propulsion (EAP) design space exploration study was continued to investigate the impact of mission constraints, further explore the design space of different sized aircraft, and improve the modeling process. Three aircraft were investigated, 18- and 48-passenger turboprops, and a 78-passenger turbofan. Baseline aircraft models were inherited from the earlier study and were hybridized by applying EAP technologies. A parametric study varying motor power and battery specific energy was conducted. For the 78-passenger turbofan, design range was also introduced as a parametric parameter. Key metrics for the study included equivalent lifecycle CO2 emissions and direct operating cost plus interest. Both turboprop aircraft demonstrated significant potential savings in block fuel consumption and CO2 emissions, but at increased operating costs compared to their baseline models. As the 78-passenger turbofan had shown no improvements in any metrics under reasonable technology assumptions, design range was shortened in an attempt to obtain performance benefits. When designed for a shorter range, the 78-passenger EAP vehicle showed potential improvements in block fuel when compared to a baseline with a similarly shortened design range, but not in any other metrics. Operating cost reductions were not achieved for any aircraft, but several designs came close to breaking even with their baselines. Smaller, shorter range aircraft and turboprops demonstrated larger performance benefits and smaller operating cost penalties, but a simple trade of electric energy storage in batteries for fuel is generally insufficient to produce a viable aircraft concept.