O'Neel, Jillian Cathleen | Engineering Papers

DOE OSTI2024

Schema Elements for Granta Annual Report: FY2024

Granta: Materials Intelligence (Granta: MI) is a commercial database software distributed by Ansys, Inc. that is utilized by the Nuclear Security Enterprise (NSE) to organize and store relevant materials data. Lack of standard and well-documented database schema is the primary obstacle to an NSE materials data management solution, so the objective of this project is to create and document such a schema. In FY21, an approach for designing, documenting, and managing a standard database schema was described based on the creation of schema elements (collections of attributes used to describe particular aspects of the data) to be used as building blocks for creating various database tables without duplication. In FY22, these methods were applied through a multi-site collaboration to create and document the schema elements necessary to build a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) testing table. In FY23 the schema was expanded to include elements for a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) table, along with schema for supporting metadata tables including Instruments, Projects, Documents, and Testing Series. In FY24 the following progress was made, again through multi-site collaboration: • The existing schema elements were modified to accommodate thermomechanical analysis (TMA) data, and a table, Test Data: TMA, was created for managing TMA data. • The elements necessary for the following additive manufacturing (AM) data tables (directed at data specific to selective laser sintering AM technology) were created: • AM Builds • AM Processes • AM Part Designs • Built AM Parts • AM Feedstock Materials • AM Feedstock Material Batches • The elements necessary for creating a Calibrated Material Models table were created, and the Calibrated Material Models table was created. In FY25 the existing schema will be deployed on the production enterprise Granta instance on the enterprise secure network. Schema elements will be appended, and new elements created as necessary, to allow the creation of tables specifically to support materials testing, AM process development, and design and analysis for modernization programs.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2024

Optimizing Aluminum Bonding: Exploring Surface Roughness and Contact Angle Effects through Plasma and Acid Etching Contrasts.

The use of adhesives to replace traditional techniques like welding and riveting has been on the rise in various industries as increasingly complex geometries and situations for bonding is required. It’s well known in the scientific community that an adhesive bond is only as efficient as the surface preparation used beforehand. Plasma treatments have been shown to gently clean the surface by only removing the top-most layer from the adherend and “charging” the surface instead of berating it. Whereas chemical treatments “etch” the surface in hopes of increasing surface area by increasing surface roughness. This method can be difficult to control quantitatively and can generate waste leading to serious environmental concerns. This study aims to address the encountered differences between plasma treatments and acid etching on aluminum substrates for adhesive bonding. Treating the surface of adherends plays a crucial role in promoting a good bond between adhesive and adherend. In this study, the effects of plasma and acid treatments are categorized using surface roughness measurements as well as contact angle which have been shown to correlate to mechanical strength. When evaluating different surface treatments, it is notable to mention that not only surface roughness and contact angle play a role in determining which method is most effective but also the consequences of the treatment itself. It was found that although chemical etching was the most effective in increasing roughness and decreasing contact angle, it generates a large amount of waste and is not sustainable compared to plasma work which uses a renewable process. The results from this work provide a deeper understanding of the relationship between surface treatments and surface roughness/contact angle and how this relates to a stronger adhesive bond

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2024

Optimizing Aluminum Bonding: Exploring Surface Roughness and Contact Angle Effects through Plasma and Acid Etching Contrasts

The use of adhesives to replace traditional techniques like welding and riveting has been on the rise in various industries as increasingly complex geometries and situations for bonding is required. It’s well known in the scientific community that an adhesive bond is only as efficient as the surface preparation used beforehand. Plasma treatments have been shown to gently clean the surface by only removing the top-most layer from the adherend and “charging” the surface instead of berating it. Whereas chemical treatments “etch” the surface in hopes of increasing surface area by increasing surface roughness. This method can be difficult to control quantitatively and can generate waste leading to serious environmental concerns. This study aims to address the encountered differences between plasma treatments and acid etching on aluminum substrates for adhesive bonding. Treating the surface of adherends plays a crucial role in promoting a good bond between adhesive and adherend. In this study, the effects of plasma and acid treatments are categorized using surface roughness measurements as well as contact angle which have been shown to correlate to mechanical strength. When evaluating different surface treatments, it is notable to mention that not only surface roughness and contact angle play a role in determining which method is most effective but also the consequences of the treatment itself. It was found that although chemical etching was the most effective in increasing roughness and decreasing contact angle, it generates a large amount of waste and is not sustainable compared to plasma work which uses a renewable process. The results from this work provide a deeper understanding of the relationship between surface treatments and surface roughness/contact angle and how this relates to a stronger adhesive bond.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗