Nehrenz, Matt | Engineering Papers

NASA NTRS2015

Generalized Nanosatellite Avionics Testbed Lab

The Generalized Nanosatellite Avionics Testbed (G-NAT) lab at NASA Ames Research Center provides a flexible, easily accessible platform for developing hardware and software for advanced small spacecraft. A collaboration between the Mission Design Division and the Intelligent Systems Division, the objective of the lab is to provide testing data and general test protocols for advanced sensors, actuators, and processors for CubeSat-class spacecraft. By developing test schemes for advanced components outside of the standard mission lifecycle, the lab is able to help reduce the risk carried by advanced nanosatellite or CubeSat missions. Such missions are often allocated very little time for testing, and too often the test facilities must be custom-built for the needs of the mission at hand. The G-NAT lab helps to eliminate these problems by providing an existing suite of testbeds that combines easily accessible, commercial-offthe- shelf (COTS) processors with a collection of existing sensors and actuators.

Testing data and general test protocols↗

NASA NTRS2014

A Comparison of Thruster Implementation Strategies for a Deep Space Nanosatellite

Attitude control for very small spacecraft, commonly referred to as nanosatellites or CubeSats, has traditionally been carried out using reaction wheels and magnetic torquers as the primary actuators. However, as these spacecraft begin to be considered for a broader range of scientific applications, including some beyond low Earth orbit, it has become necessary to also consider thruster systems for actuation. In recent years a number of thruster designs that conform to the mass, volume, and power constraints of nanosatellites have become commercially available, including cold gas systems, pulsed plasma thrusters (PPTs), and micro-electrospray propulsion (MEP) systems. The challenge now facing the nanosatellite community is to determine which thruster solutions are appropriate for a particular application, and what the best method of control might be. This paper will compare the implementation of a cold gas system with that of an MEP or PPT system for an upcoming nanosatellite mission using a previously reported saturation-restricted control law. Results are presented for this controller both with and without a fuel-optimal thruster allocation scheme, and an assessment on incorporating these technologies in an upcoming NASA mission is offered.

Nehrenz, Matt↗