Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Nadell, Shari-Beth.
This paper presents a project overview and status for the Weather Accident Prevention (WxAP) aviation safety program. The topics include: 1) Weather Accident Prevention Project Background/History; 2) Project Modifications; 3) Project Accomplishments; and 4) Project's Next Steps.
A system of analytical and numerical two-dimensional mixer/ejector nozzle models that require minimal empirical input has been developed and programmed for use in conceptual and preliminary design. This report contains a user's guide describing the operation of the computer code, DREA (Differential Reduced Ejector/mixer Analysis), that contains these mathematical models. This program is currently being adopted by the Propulsion Systems Analysis Office at the NASA Glenn Research Center. A brief summary of the DREA method is provided, followed by detailed descriptions of the program input and output files. Sample cases demonstrating the application of the program are presented.
As part of a contract with the NASA Lewis Research Center, a simple, accurate method of predicting the performance characteristics of a nozzle design has been developed for use in conceptual design studies. The Nozzle Performance Analysis Code (NPAC) can predict the on- and off-design performance of axisymmetric or two-dimensional convergent and convergent-divergent nozzle geometries. NPAC accounts for the effects of overexpansion or underexpansion, flow divergence, wall friction, heat transfer, and small mass addition or loss across surfaces when the nozzle gross thrust and gross thrust coefficient are being computed. NPAC can be used to predict the performance of a given nozzle design or to develop a preliminary nozzle system design for subsequent analysis. The input required by NPAC consists of a simple geometry definition of the nozzle surfaces, the location of key nozzle stations (entrance, throat, exit), and the nozzle entrance flow properties. NPAC performs three analysis "passes" on the nozzle geometry. First, an isentropic control volume analysis is performed to determine the gross thrust and gross thrust coefficient of the nozzle. During the second analysis pass, the skin friction and heat transfer losses are computed. The third analysis pass couples the effects of wall shear and heat transfer with the initial internal nozzle flow solutions to produce a system of equations that is solved at steps along the nozzle geometry. Small mass additions or losses, such as those resulting from leakage or bleed flow, can be included in the model at specified geometric sections. A final correction is made to account for divergence losses that are incurred if the nozzle exit flow is not purely axial.
A new minimum weight design method for high-speed axisymmetric inlets was demonstrated on a generic inlet. The method uses Classical Beam Theory and shell buckling to determine the minimum required equivalent isotropic thickness for a stiffened shell based on prescribed structural design requirements and load conditions. The optimum spacing and equivalent isotropic thickness of ring frame supports are computed to prevent buckling. The method thus develops a preliminary structural design for the inlet and computes the structural weight. Finite element analyses were performed on the resulting inlet design to evaluate the analytical results. Comparisons between the analytical and finite element stresses and deflections identified areas needing improvement in the analytical method. The addition of the deflection due to shear and a torsional buckling failure mode to the new method brought its results in line with those from the finite element analyses. Final validation of the new method will be made using data from actual inlets.
An analytical method for determining the minimum weight design of an axisymmetric supersonic inlet has been developed. The goal of this method development project was to improve the ability to predict the weight of high-speed inlets in conceptual and preliminary design. The initial model was developed using information that was available from inlet conceptual design tools (e.g., the inlet internal and external geometries and pressure distributions). Stiffened shell construction was assumed. Mass properties were computed by analyzing a parametric cubic curve representation of the inlet geometry. Design loads and stresses were developed at analysis stations along the length of the inlet. The equivalent minimum structural thicknesses for both shell and frame structures required to support the maximum loads produced by various load conditions were then determined. Preliminary results indicated that inlet hammershock pressures produced the critical design load condition for a significant portion of the inlet. By improving the accuracy of inlet weight predictions, the method will improve the fidelity of propulsion and vehicle design studies and increase the accuracy of weight versus cost studies.
Structural design and analysis tools appropriate for estimating the structural weight of an axisymmetric inlet designed for Mach 2.4 cruise were evaluated. Little information regarding the inlet mechanical design is available in the preliminary design phase, so it is necessary to first develop a reasonable structural design before estimating the inlet weight. The Internally Pressurized Structure Synthesis and Optimization (IPSSO) program, employing an analytical approach, was chosen for evaluation due to its combined design and analysis capabilities. The inlet design produced by IPSSO was then analyzed using the NASTRAN finite element program. The finite element analysis was performed to help identify the limitations of the analytically based code as well as to evaluate NASTRAN for this application. Comparison between the IPSSO inlet weight and that of a similar inlet developed by the Boeing Commercial Airplane Group was also made. Program evaluation concluded that the combined use of IPSSO to create an initial design and NASTRAN to perform a numerical analysis would provide the capability to evaluate a limited number of inlet design The development of a new tool for the minimum weight design and analysis of inlet structures would be required for greater flexibility in evaluating inlet conceptual designs.
NASA Lewis Research Center studied a horizontal takeoff and landing, fully reusable, two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) vehicle capable of launching and returning a 10,000 pound payload to low earth orbit using low-risk technology. The vehicle, called Beta 2, was derived from the USAF/Boeing Beta vehicle, a TSTO study vehicle capable of launching a 50,000 pound payload to low earth orbit. Development of the Beta 2 from the USAF/Boeing Beta vehicle occurred in a series of iterations during which the size of the vehicle was decreased to accommodate the smaller payload, the staging Mach number was decreased from 8.0 to 6.5, and the rocket propulsion system was removed from the booster. The final Beta 2 vehicle consisted of a rocket powered orbiter and an all airbreathing booster. The gross takeoff weight of the Beta 2 vehicle was approximately 1.1 million pounds. In addition to its baseline mission, the Beta 2 was capable of delivering approximately 17,500 pounds to the Space Station with the same takeoff gross weight. The mission and sizing analysis performed to arrive at the Beta 2 vehicle is discussed.
NASA Lewis Research Center studied a horizontal takeoff and landing, fully reusable, two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) vehicle capable of launching and returning a 10,000 pound payload to low Earth polar orbit using low-risk technology. The vehicle, called Beta 2, was derived from the USAF/Boeing Beta vehicle, a TSTO study vehicle capable of launching a 50,000 pound payload to low Earth polar orbit. Development of the Beta 2 from the USAF/Boeing Beta vehicle occurred in a series of iterations during which the size of the vehicle was decreased to accommodate the smaller payload, the staging Mach number was decreased from 8.0 to 6.5, and the rocket propulsion system was removed from the booster. The final Beta 2 vehicle consisted of a rocket powered orbiter and an all airbreathing booster. The gross takeoff weight of the Beta 2 vehicle was approximately 1.1 million pounds. In addition to its baseline mission, the Beta 2 was capable of delivering approximately 17,500 pounds to the Space Station with the same takeoff gross weight. The mission and sizing analysis performed to arrived at the Beta 2 vehicle is discussed.