Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

N. Petro

Publications and source records attributed to N. Petro.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

Planetary Science Training for Artemis Missions

Planetary geology training for Artemis crews and mission support teams is well underway. We recently reported on the development of our geology/planetary science training flow, and the cross-agency coordination efforts necessary for implementing the training [1, 2]. We discussed our progressive geology training program that starts with incoming astronaut classes, offers opportunities to maintain the geology proficiency between flight assignments, and trains the broader Artemis engineering-operations management community in geology and basic field methods [3, 4]. In this abstract, we outline and discuss our 2023 accomplishments and near-term plans for continued development of lunar science classroom content, field training objectives, and the delivery of geology training to astronauts and the Artemis mission engineers.

Artemis↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Spatial Relationship of Graben and Pit Craters at Rimae Daniell and the Implications of Scarp Formation

A geomorphologically complex and understudied region on the Moon is Rimæ Daniell, situated in Lacus Somniorum. This region is characterized by a set of NNW-SSE-oriented grabens, which have been implied to be underlain by dikes through topographic measurements of ground displacements and faulting processes. The coverage of topographic measurements with the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) aboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) now allows for an indepth morphologic analysis of lunar grabens. Lunar grabens, in general, occur peripheral to some near-side mare units, within floor-fractured craters, and inside larger impact structures. From, LOLA data across Rimæ Daniell indicate that these grabens are located atop broad rises that stand 100–150 m above their surroundings. Although has mapped out the northwestern most grabens at Rimæ Daniell, this area has a complex geologic history, including pit chain craters and the transition of the graben system to a steep scarp, which is disrupted by knobby terrain.

C. J. Ahrens↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Future Lunar Geophysical Mission Opportunities Including the Lunar Geophysical Network and CLPS

In the next few years, several opportunities are underway to take new geophysical observations of the Moon including geodetic and seismic. NASA’s novel Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program seeks to acquire delivery services from 14 US companies. Nine funded task orders have been selected with payloads from multiple disciplines. Here we review the upcoming geophysical CLPS payloads and their measurement objectives then we provide a review of the Lunar Geophysical Network mission in development for New Frontiers 5. The Lunar Geophysical Network (LGN) mission is proposed to land on the Moon in the early 2030’s and deploy packages at four locations to enable continuous geophysical measurements for a minimum of 6 and a goal of 10 years. Returning to the lunar surface with a long-lived geophysical network is a key next step to advance lunar and planetary science. LGN will greatly expand our primarily Apollo-based knowledge of the deep lunar interior by identifying and characterizing mantle melt layers, as well as core size and state. To meet the mission objectives, the instrument suite provides complementary seismic, geodetic, heat flow, and electromagnetic (EM) observations. We discuss the network landing site requirements and provide example sites that meet these requirements. Landing sites include the P-5 region within the Procellarum KREEP Terrane (PKT; (lat:15˚; lon:-35˚), Schickard basin (lat:-44.3˚; lon:-55.1˚), Crisium basin (lat:18.5˚; lon:61.8˚), and the farside Korolev basin (lat:-2.4˚; lon:-159.3˚) (Figure 1). Network optimization considers the best locations to observe seismic core phases, e.g., ScS and PKP. Ray path density and proximity to young fault scarps are also analyzed to provide increased opportunities for seismic observations. Geodetic constraints from laser ranging require the LGN to have at least three nearside stations at maximum limb distances. Heat flow and EM measurements should be obtained away from terrane boundaries and from magnetic anomalies at locations representative of global trends. In our recent paper, an in-depth case study is provided for Mare Crisium. We also discuss the consequences for scientific return of less-than-optimal locations or number of stations.

Moons↗