Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Moore, R. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Moore, R. D..

At least 37 records · Page 2

Performance of low-pressure-ratio fan stage at two off-design blade setting angles

The overall and blade-element performance of a low pressure ratio, low tip speed fan stage at design speed is presented for tow off-design rotor blade angle settings. The rotor design tip speed is 243.8 m/sec and weight flow per unit annulus area is 175.8 kg/sec. Design weight flow and pressure ratio are 29.9 kg/sec and 1.151, respectively.

Kovich, G.↗

Effects of tip clearance on overall performance of transonic fan stage with and without casing treatment

The overall performance of a transonic fan stage is presented for various tip clearances, with and without casing treatment. The stage was tested with a solid casing, and with open skewed slots and closed skewed slots in the casing over the rotor blade tips. Four nominal nonrotating rotor blade tip clearances from 0.061 to 0.178 centimeter were used. For all three casings, the pressure ratio and efficiency decreased with increasing tip clearance. The stall margin for a given casing also decreased with increasing clearance. At design speed and a given tip clearance, the highest stall margin was obtained with the open-slot casing, and the lowest stall margin was obtained with the solid casing.

Moore, R. D.↗

Effect of casing treatment of overall performance of axial-flow transonic fan stage with pressure ratio of 1.75 and tip solidity of 1.5

The effect of a number of casing treatments on the overall performance of a 1.75-pressure-ratio, 423-m/sec-tip-speed fan stage was evaluated. The skewed slot configuration with short-open slots over the midportion of the rotor had a stall margin of 23.5 percent, while the solid casing had a stall margin of 15.0 percent. The skewed slot configuration with long open slots extending ahead of and over portion of rotor displaced the stall line to the lowest flow at all speeds tested. At design speed, the peak efficiency for the long, forward open slots was 1 point less than that for the short midopen slots and 3 points less than that for the solid casing.

Osborn, W. M.↗

Performance of 1.15-pressure-ratio fan stage at several rotor blade setting angles with reverse flow

A 51 cm diameter low pressure ratio fan stage was tested in reverse flow. Survey flow data were taken over the range of rotative speed from 50 percent to 100 percent design speed at several rotor blade setting angles through both flat and feather pitch. Normal flow design values of pressure ratio and weight flow were 1.15 and 29.9 kg/sec with a rotor tip speed of 243.8 m/sec. The maximum thrust in reverse flow was 52.5 percent of design thrust in normal flow.

Kovich, G.↗

Aerodynamic performance of a 1.20-pressure ratio fan stage designed for low noise

The aerodynamic design and the overall blade element performance of a 51 centimeter diameter fan stage is presented. The stage was designed to minimize the noise generated by rotor stator interactions. The design pressure ratio was 1.20 at a flow of 30.6 kilograms per second and a rotor blade tip speed of 228.6 meters per second. At design speed the rotor peak efficiency was 0.935. The peak efficiency of the stage, however, was 0.824. The radial distribution of rotor performance parameters at peak efficiency and design speed indicated excellent agreement with design values.

Lewis, G. W., Jr.↗

Aerodynamic performance of two variable-pitch fan stages

NASA-Lewis Research Center is investigating a variety of fan stages applicable for short-haul aircraft. These low-pressure-ratio low-speed fan stages may require variable-pitch rotor blades to provide optimum performance for the varied flight demands and for thrust reversal on landing. A number of the aerodynamic and structural compromises relating to variable-pitch rotor blades are discussed. The aerodynamic performance of two variable-pitch fan stages operated at several rotor-blade setting angles is evaluated for both forward- and reverse-flow application. Detailed radial surveys are presented for both forward and reverse flow.

Moore, R. D.↗

Overall and blade element performance of a 1.20-pressure-ratio fan stage with rotor blades reset -5 deg

A 51-cm-diam model of a fan stage for a short haul aircraft was tested in a single stage-compressor research facility. The rotor blades were set 5 deg toward the axial direction (opened) from design setting angle. Surveys of the air flow conditions ahead of the rotor, between the rotor and stator, and behind the stator were made over the stable operating range of the stage. At the design speed of 213.3 m/sec and a weight flow of 31.5 kg/sec, the stage pressure ratio and efficiency were 1.195 and 0.88, respectively. The design speed rotor peak efficiency of 0.91 occurred at the same flow rate.

Lewis, G. W., Jr.↗

Aerodynamic performance of 0.4066-scale model to JT8D refan stage

The aerodynamic performance of a scale model of the split flow JT8D rafan stage is presented over a range of flows at speeds from 40 to 100 percent design. The bypass stage peak efficiency of 0.800 occurred at a total weight flow of 35.82 kilograms per second and a pressure ratio of 1.697. The stall margin was 15 percent based on pressure ratio and weight flow at stall and peak efficiency conditions. The data indicated that the hub region of the core stators was choked at design speed over the entire flow range tested.

Moore, R. D.↗

Performance of a low-pressure fan stage with reverse flow

The reverse flow aerodynamic performance of a 51-centimeter-diameter fan stage is presented. The stage was tested with the variable pitch rotor blades set through feather at -75 deg, -80 deg, and -85 deg from design setting angle. Of the three tested the stage with the rotor blades set at -75 deg exhibited the highest pressure ratio and highest flow. For all three configurations, there was little or no flow in the inner third of the exit passage due to the rotor blade being almost perpendicular to the axial direction in the hub region.

Moore, R. D.↗

Effect of casing treatment on performance of an inlet stage for a transonic multistage compressor

An inlet stage of a transonic compressor was tested with three rotor tip casing treatment configurations: blade angle slots, circumferential grooves, and axial skewed slots. Significant increases in both rotor and stage total pressure ratio, total temperature ratio, efficiency, flow range, and very large improvements in stall margin were obtained with all three casing treatment configurations. The greatest improvement in performance was achieved with axial skewed slots.

Urasek, D. C.↗

Aerodynamic Performance of Two Variable-Pitch Fan Stages

The NASA-Lewis Research Center is investigating a variety of fan stages applicable for short haul aircraft. These low-pressure-ratio low-speed fan stages may require variable-pitch rotor blades to provide optimum performance for the varied flight demands and for thrust reversal on landing. A number of the aerodynamic and structural compromises relating to the variable-pitch rotor blades are discussed. The aerodynamic performance of two variable-pitch fan stages operated at several rotor blade setting angles for both forward and reverse flow application are presented. Detailed radial surveys are presented for both forward and reverse flow.

Moore, R. D.↗

Aerodynamic performance of a 1.25-pressure-ratio axial-flow fan stage

Aerodynamic design parameters and overall and blade-element performances of a 1.25-pressure-ratio fan stage are reported. Detailed radial surveys were made over the stable operating flow range at rotative speeds from 70 to 120 percent of design speed. At design speed, the measured stage peak efficiency of 0.872 occurred at a weight flow of 34.92 kilograms per second and a pressure ratio of 1.242. Stage stall margin is about 20 percent based on the peak efficiency and stall conditions. The overall peak efficiency for the rotor was 0.911. The overall stage performance showed no significant change when the stators were positioned at 1, 2, or 4 chords downstream of the rotor.

Moore, R. D.↗

Prediction of pump cavitation performance

A method for predicting pump cavitation performance with various liquids, liquid temperatures, and rotative speeds is presented. Use of the method requires that two sets of test data be available for the pump of interest. Good agreement between predicted and experimental results of cavitation performance was obtained for several pumps operated in liquids which exhibit a wide range of properties. Two cavitation parameters which qualitatively evaluate pump cavitation performance are also presented.

Moore, R. D.↗

Performance of transonic fan stage with weight flow per unit annulus area of 178 kilograms per second per square meter (6.5(lb/sec)/(sq ft))

The overall and blade-element performances are presented over the stable flow operating range from 50 to 100 percent of design speed. Stage peak efficiency of 0.834 was obtained at a weight flow of 26.4 kg/sec (58.3 lb/sec) and a pressure ratio of 1.581. The stall margin for the stage was 7.5 percent based on weight flow and pressure ratio at stall and peak efficiency conditions. The rotor minimum losses were approximately equal to design except in the blade vibration damper region. Stator minimum losses were less than design except in the tip and damper regions.

Moore, R. D.↗

Performance of transonic fan stage with weight flow per unit annulus area of 208 kilograms per second per square meter (42.6 (lb/sec)/sq ft)

Performance was obtained for a 50-cm-diameter compressor designed for a high weight flow per unit annulus area of 208 (kg/sec)/sq m. Peak efficiency values of 0.83 and 0.79 were obtained for the rotor and stage, respectively. The stall margin for the stage was 23 percent, based on equivalent weight flow and total-pressure ratio at peak efficiency and stall.

Urasek, D. C.↗

Performance of transonic fan stage with weight flow per unit annulus area of 198 kilograms per second per square meter (40.6(lb/sec)/sq ft)

The overall and blade-element performance are presented for an air compressor stage designed to study the effect of weight flow per unit annulus area on efficiency and flow range. At the design speed of 424.8 m/sec the peak efficiency of 0.81 occurred at the design weight flow and a total pressure ratio of 1.56. Design pressure ratio and weight flow were 1.57 and 29.5 kg/sec (65.0 lb/sec), respectively. Stall margin at design speed was 19 percent based on the weight flow and pressure ratio at peak efficiency and at stall.

Kovich, G.↗

Performance of a single-stage transonic compressor with a blade-tip solidity of 1.5 and comparison with 1.3 and 1.7 solidity stages

The overall and blade-element performance of a transonic compressor stage with a tip solidity of 1.5 is presented over the stable operating range at rotative speeds from 50 to 100 percent of design speed. State peak efficiency of 0.82 was obtained at a weight flow of 29.4 kg.sec (200.4 (kg/sec)/m2 of annulus area) and a pressure ratio of 1.71. Stall margin at design speed was 14 percent. A comparison of three stages in a solidity study showed that the performance of the 1.5 solidity stage and the 1.3 solidity stage were nearly identical but that the performance of the 1.7 solidity stage was significantly lower.

Osborn, W. M.↗

Performance of a 1.20 pressure ratio STOL fan stage at three rotor blade setting angles

A model of a short takeoff and landing (STOL) fan stage was testedin a single-stage compressor research facility. Surveys of the airflow conditions ahead of the rotor, between the rotor and stator, and behind the stator were made over the stable operating range of the stage. At the design speed of 213.3 meters per second and a weight flow of 31.2 kilograms per second, the stage pressure ratio of 1.15 was less than the design value of 1.2. The stage was tested with the rotor blades reset for more flow. Design pressure ratio was achieved and surpassed with the minus 5 deg and minus 7 deg resets, respectively. The stage efficiency was 0.88 for the minus 5 deg reset and 0.85 for the minus 7 deg reset.

Lewis, G. W., Jr.↗