Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Milojevich, Allyn

Publications and source records attributed to Milojevich, Allyn.

Safeguards Technology for Thorium Fuel Cycles: Research and Development Needs Assessment and Recommendations

This report presents Safeguards Technology for Thorium Fuel Cycles: Research and Development Needs Assessment and Recommendations prepared for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Research and Development (DNN R&D) Safeguards Program by a multilaboratory team from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Y-12 National Security Complex. It documents key findings of a 2-year scoping study on “Safeguards Technology Needs Assessment for Leading Thorium Fuel Cycles” (project OR18-V-SG Tec Needs Th Fuel Cycles-PD1Lb).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Performance Testing in the Secure Transport of Nuclear, Radiological, and other High-Risk Materials

A long established methodology for determining the effectiveness of an overall physical protection system (PPS) is through a healthy and robust performance testing program. Performance tests are vital because they provide essential information used in the determination of asset risk and the analysis of protection effectiveness. By establishing and verifying detection, assessment, response, interruption, and neutralization data, one can determine baseline protection effectiveness and consider upgrade scenarios and improving effectiveness. Performance testing also addresses the needs of multiple stakeholders, including the vulnerability assessment teams, site/facility personnel, and safety, and provides management with an independent, objective assessment of overall physical protection systems.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗

The International Nuclear Material Transport Security Regime: A. Multi-Modal Tapestry of Conventions and Agreements

The international legal framework for transporting nuclear material is complex. The tapestry of conventions and agreements in place vary based on the material in transport, the mode or modes of transport used, and the location where the transport is taking place. The instruments range in scale from the international Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities and the Amendment to regional conventions and agreements such as those for rail transport (RID), inland waterway (ADN), and road (ADR). As part of their international commitments under the various conventions and agreements, signatories are required to abide by and harmonize their regulations to these international instruments. The challenge for Competent Authorities in drafting regulations consistent with a Member States obligation under international law can be complex. In addition to ensuring their own authority to draft regulations consistent with these conventions, a Competent Authority may need to coordinate with other ministries, departments, or agencies in mapping the various conventions, their annexes, the requirements therein, and understanding how to develop regulations that align both to international law and domestic law. This paper addresses each of these conventions and agreements; providing a summary description of what each means to individual entities that are transporting nuclear material, provide the total number of States Party to each, provide a graphical framework for unpacking the legal complexities at the international level to assist users and competent authorities in orienting themselves to the international instruments and how they apply to specific shipments. A detailed evaluation has been made of the various international and regional conventions and agreements that help govern the security during the international and in some cases the domestic transport of nuclear material, therein providing a tool for understanding the international transport regime for moving these materials.

Fialkoff, Marc↗

Enhancing Research Reactor Safeguards Through the Use of Mailbox Declarations

There are historic examples in several States of research reactors being misused to produce undeclared nuclear material. However, misuse of a State’s research reactor has typically only been discovered after further investigation into the State’s non-compliance related to other undeclared activities. Light water research reactors are typically designed with sample irradiation ports, where the introduction of fertile material can illicitly produce fissile material. Additionally, some light water reactors continue to be fueled by highly enriched uranium, which is a more significant safeguards concern by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Heavy water and graphite reactors can be used for illicit plutonium production, which is of particular proliferation concern. Because research reactors are designed for flexible operations and small research reactors are less frequently inspected by the IAEA than other nuclear facilities (depending on power and fuel type, it could several years between inspections), the likelihood of timely detection by the IAEA of misuse of the research reactor is low. During a 2013 workshop on safeguarding research reactors, the United States, France, and the United Kingdom made recommendations to the IAEA on how safeguards could be strengthened for such facilities. One of the recommendations was to assess the use of “mailbox” declarations coupled with short notice random inspections or unannounced inspections by the IAEA at research reactors. An electronic mailbox declaration refers to the use of a secure information repository into which an operator submits operating reports. The near real time submittal of information enables the IAEA to better implement randomized short notice inspections. These mailboxes are not used for collecting and submitting State reports to the IAEA, but for collecting and transmitting operator data. The use of mailboxes, in conjunction with short notice random inspections, is in routine use for some other facility types. This paper assesses the potential for the practical application of mailbox declarations for various research reactor types and how the approach could be effectively used. Potential diversion scenarios are described and operator data records are discussed in connection to mailbox declarations, including discussion of how the data could indicate research reactor misuse.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Mailbox Declarations for Research Reactors

It is proposed that mailbox declarations for research reactors are complementary to the SLC and may be applied with a similar approach, matching the safeguards approach to the appropriate safeguards priority level.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗