Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Miller, L Paul

Publications and source records attributed to Miller, L Paul.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

NEAMS Workbench MOOSE Integration Update

The Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Workbench is a graphical user interface (GUI) that provides a common analysis environment for the accelerated use of the NEAMS toolkit. To improve design and analysis of current and future nuclear energy systems, the NEAMS Workbench provides an integrated development environment for model creation, review, execution, output review, and visualization for integrated tools. In addition to a GUI, the NEAMS Workbench provides the Workbench Analysis Sequence Processor, an open-source tool set that facilitates input-content assistance for supported domain-specific input languages and user-friendly syntaxes. These supported syntaxes enable accelerated development and deployment of enhanced user inputs and workflows. The Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) has been supported in the NEAMS Workbench since 2016 and receives continuous updates. Efforts to improve MOOSE-based tool integration in the NEAMS Workbench are ongoing. This document details the current and planned enhancements of the NEAMS Workbench and the MOOSE framework to improve integration and usability of MOOSE-based applications within the NEAMS Workbench.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Demonstration of the On-the-Fly Shielding Analysis Method: Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition

This report documents work performed supporting the US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition (SFWD) Integrated Waste Management activities under work breakdown structure element 1.08.02.04.01, “Data and Tools Development, Validation, and Maintenance.” In particular, this report fulfills milestone M3SF-21OR020401016, “Implement on-the-fly dose analysis methodology in UNF-ST&DARDS” within work package SF-21OR02040101, “Commercial SNF Characterization - ORNL.” The Used Nuclear Fuel - Storage, Transportation & Disposal Analysis Resource and Data System (UNFST& DARDS) enables automated dose rate calculations for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) transportation packages and storage casks using a Monte Carlo radiation transport code. The explicit method uses a detailed model of the SNF system and its contents. Therefore, a dose rate calculation is required for each as-loaded transportation package or storage cask because the SNF assemblies within a canister typically have unique irradiation characteristics. An alternate method, referred to as the “on-the-fly” shielding analysis method, has been proposed that requires only a set of Monte Carlo dose rate calculations for each transportation packaging/storage cask design. The results of the Monte Carlo dose rate calculations are independent of the SNF assembly irradiation and decay characteristics. The dose rate values may then be combined with the radiation source strength of the SNF assemblies associated with a particular transportation packaging/storage cask design to determine actual dose rates. This report presents on-the-fly dose rate calculations for a representative SNF storage cask and verification of the on-the-fly dose rate calculation results by comparison with reference dose rate calculations using the explicit Monte Carlo dose rate calculation. The on-the-fly shielding analysis method was implemented in UNF-ST&DARDS. A Python program was developed to process the MAVRIC dose rate results obtained by source particle type, energy group, and fuel geometry region. A Python processor created binary files, which were saved as a special UNF-ST&DARDS library for on-the- fly shielding analyses. UNF-ST&DARDS uses the precalculated on-the-fly binary libraries generated by the Python data processor and directly executes the Python code for on-the-fly dose analysis. This Python code unzips the pre-generated binary files mentioned above, reads the data, and combines them with user-specified sources for dose and uncertainty calculations. The Python programs were verified using Excel calculations and by comparison with the values obtained with the MAVRIC post-processing utilities applied to the 3dmap files. This method can currently be used to determine dose rates for as-loaded HI-STORM FW storage casks. The UNF-ST&DARDS analysis wizard for on-the-fly shielding analysis is described in this report.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Basket Modification Concepts for Disposal Reactivity Control of Dual Purpose Canisters

This report documents work performed supporting the US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition (SFWD), Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology, under work breakdown structure element 1.08.01.03.05, “Direct Disposal of Dual Purpose Canisters.” In particular, this report fulfills milestone M3SF-21OR010305125, “DPC criticality analysis with fuel/basket modification,” within work package SF-21OR01030512, “DPC Reactivity and Criticality Modeling—ORNL.” This report uses three of the most reactive canisters that have been analyzed to-date using UNFST&DARDS to examine the performance of three potential reactivity suppression technologies under disposal conditions. Three already loaded canisters were analyzed using as-loaded contents including TSC-37 and MPC-32 pressurized water reactor (PWR) dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) and the MPC-89 DPCs. The reactivity suppression technologies considered were the B4C-filled disposal control rod assembly (DCRA) and the advanced neutron absorber (ANA)–based chevron insert for the PWR canisters and the ANA-based fuel channel replacement absorber for the MPC-89. For each combination of absorber concept and DPC, various insert patterns and absorber material concentrations were considered. The results of the analysis show that the DCRA concept has promise for providing reactivity hold-down for PWR DPCs, and the ANA fuel channel replacement absorber has promise for providing reactivity holddown in BWR DPCs. The ANA chevron basket insert showed mixed results, providing sufficient reactivity hold-down in the lower reactivity canister, but failing to do so in the higher reactivity canister considered herein.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗