Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Miller, Joel S.

Publications and source records attributed to Miller, Joel S..

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Origin of the magnetic couplings for the weak ferromagnet Li + [TCNE] •- (TCNE = Tetracyanoethylene)

Based upon the 16-K crystal structure, the nearest-neighbor spin couplings (J; H = –2JS a •S b ) for the weak ferromagnet (=canted antiferromagnet) Li + [TCNE] •- (TCNE = tetracyanoethylene) (T c = 21 K), which possesses two interpenetrating diamondoid sublattices with two layers of parallel [TCNE] •- s canted with respect to each other by ~60°, are computed at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pV-TZ-level. Li[TCNE] has computed interlattice, through-space interactions that exceed the intralattice, through-bonding to Li + interactions, that are antiferromagnetic. The interlattice interactions dominate the spin coupling leading to the observed weak ferromagnetic behavior. Finally, the computed J's based upon the 50-K structure have the strongest ferromagnetic intralayer interlattice interactions increase by 2.9 ± 0.6% while the antiferromagnetic interlayer interlattice interaction increases by 23% with respect to the 16K results and are in accord with the observed initial increase and subsequent decrease in the temperature dependence of the canting angle that is a consequence of the these changing opposed interactions arising from the change in structure as a function of temperature.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2021

Pressure and temperature dependences of the canting angle and increase in the magnetic ordering temperature, T c ( P ), for the weak ferromagnet Li + [TCNE]˙ – (TCNE = tetracyanoethylene)

The hydrostatic pressure dependence of the magnetic ordering temperature, T c (P), for the interpenetrating, diamondoid lattice-structured, weak ferromagnet (= canted antiferromagnet) Li + [TCNE]˙ – (TCNE = tetracyanoethylene) reversibly increases from 20.9 to 23.4 K at 9.73 kbar, an increase of 12% with a rate of increase, dT c /dP, of 0.27 K kbar –1 . The 5 T magnetization increased by 672% from 186 emu Oe mol –1 at ambient pressure to an average of 1440 emuOe mol –1 upon application of pressure. The remanent magnetization initially increases 30% from 10.8 to 14.0 emuOe mol –1 from ambient to 0.06 kbar, and increases further by 6% to a maximum of 14.8 emuOe mol –1 at 0.56 kbar before declining by 22% to 11.5 emuOe mol –1 at 9.73 kbar. The pressure-dependent coercive field, H cr (P), initially decreases by 42% from 31.1 Oe at ambient pressure to 18 Oe at 0.06 kbar, then increases to 52 Oe at 9.73 kbar. The canting angle, α, increases by 28% from 0.52° to 0.66° at 0.06 kbar, then decreases by 23% to 0.51° at 9.73 kbar, as well as increases by 2% from 0.536° to 0.548° from 1.8 to 2.5 K, before decreasing by 79% to 0.117° at 19 K. The interlattice interactions are attributed to be the primary exchange mechanism. Furthermore, α(T) and α(P) have similar dependencies that are attributed to a competition between an increase and a decrease in the intra- and interlayer C … N interlattice separations as the temperature and pressure increases.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗