Engineering topics

Michelle A Rucker

Publications and source records attributed to Michelle A Rucker.

15 records

NASA NTRS2024

Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate: Moon to Mars Architecture Definition Document

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery. Extending the reach of humanity through the human exploration of the Moon, Mars, and beyond is key to that mission. NASA’s Moon to Mars Strategy and Objectives document establishes long-term goals and objectives for crewed deep space exploration; however, satisfying NASA’s Moon to Mars Objectives requires an innovative approach to the definition, management, and execution of NASA’s Moon to Mars Architecture. An architecture offers a high-level unifying structure and defines a system. It provides rules, guidelines, and constraints that define a cohesive and coherent framework that identifies constituent parts, relationships, and connections and establishes how those parts fit and work together. This Architecture Definition Document (ADD) establishes the process for the decomposition of objectives empowers the agency’s success in achieving human exploration of the cosmos. NASA updates this document annually to reflect the maturation of the architecture and the progress NASA and partners make toward achieving exploration objectives. The ADD is not a manifest or requirements document. Instead, it serves as a tool for the programs, projects, and engineers who will implement and execute NASA’s bold ambitions for crewed exploration of deep space. As established in the Moon to Mars Strategy and Objectives, “Why” we explore encompasses three pillars: Science, Inspiration, and National Posture. Ensuring success in all three areas requires an architectural approach that incorporates innovation, collaboration, and partnerships that can be sustained across a multi-decadal effort. This second revision (Rev-B) of the ADD, developed to support NASA’s 2024 Architecture Concept Review (ACR), incorporates several key updates to support the continued evolution of the architecture. Since the last revision of the ADD, NASA has significantly improved the clarity of the objective decomposition, which distills exploration objectives into the characteristics and needs and use cases and functions needed to achieve them. The updated decomposition incorporates findings from internal studies and diverse stakeholder feedback. A model-based systems engineering approach ensures coherence and consistency, removing inconsistency and repetition. Revision B also incorporates advancements to NASA’s Mars architecture, including insight into initial capabilities, systems, and operations necessary to support the Humans to Mars segment. Updates to objective decomposition for Mars add significant detail to the ADD and hint at areas of forward work and future study. An appendix adds greater depth in the future decisions needed for Mars that will drive lunar needs. They are not the only decisions to be made, but they will have huge effects on subsequent decisions. NASA continues to introduce new exploration systems into the architecture. Two new elements — initial surface habitat and lunar surface cargo lander—successfully passed mission concept review in 2024 as a result of extensive analysis, concept refinement, and studies. These elements and their respective reference missions appear in this revision. NASA also continues to apply architecture processes to cross-agency efforts and coordination with external stakeholders by including definitions of architecture technology gaps — essential areas for engagement across and beyond the agency. The technology gaps appendix identifies areas that need attention and innovation to enable future exploration. In publishing this information, NASA communicates the technologies and capabilities that may benefit from partnership with industry, academia, other U.S. government agencies, and international space agencies. Ultimately, NASA established the Moon to Mars Architecture approach to communicate and facilitate humanity’s journey into the universe according to the principles and recurring tenets of NASA’s Moon to Mars Strategy and Objectives. The NASA architecture team thanks their many stakeholders, participants, and partners for their efforts to review and provide feedback. Their support has been critical to the success of this approach.

Elements↗

NASA NTRS2024

Mars Surface Power Generation Challenges and Considerations

Once the challenges of reaching and landing safely on Mars have been met, the first human explorers will be faced with the challenge of finding sufficient energy to power the systems they will need for a healthy and productive stay on the surface and for their ascent back to orbit.

Moon↗

NASA NTRS2024

Round-Trip Mars Mission Mass Challenges

As noted in the 2022 Architecture Concept Review Mars Transportation, white paper, the distance between Earth and Mars changes constantly as the two planets revolve around the Sun. Regardless of their relative position, traveling to Mars requires significantly more energy than lunar missions. However, the distance between the planets is only part of the story. This white paper explains how gravity wells, combined with the distance and desired transit duration between them, serve as a mass, and potentially cost, multiplier for a round-trip human Mars mission.

Moon↗

NASA NTRS2024

Key Mars Architecture Decisions

As noted in the 2022 Architecture Concept Review Systems Analysis of Architecture Drivers white paper, exploration architectures are heavily influenced by the order in which driving questions are answered. Decisions in one part of the architecture will ripple through other parts of the architecture and beyond, often in ways that are not intuitively obvious.

Michelle A Rucker↗

NASA NTRS2024

Mars Communications Disruption and Delay

The communications disruption and delay profile for a Mars mission will depend on the trajectory profile of the mission, though some generalizations can be made. While several factors can contribute to communications disruption and delay, this paper addresses the unique physical characteristics of Mars transit and Mars-vicinity operations.

Michael B Chappell↗

NASA NTRS2024

Mars Mission Abort Considerations

Throughout the history of human spaceflight, astronauts have never been more than and rarely more than a few hours) from Earth. Aborts for missions to low-Earth orbit or the International Space Station are relatively short. Aborts for lunar missions may be longer than aborts from Earth vicinity but are still measured in days.

Patrick Rei-po Chai↗

NASA NTRS2023

Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate (ESDMD) Moon-to-Mars Architecture Definition Document

There are many opportunities in executing the ambitious Moon-to-Mars efforts through an integrated architecture. NASA addresses this in its Moon-to-Mars Strategy and Objectives Development2 document (hereafter referred to as the M2M Strategy). Many of these opportunities involve establishing a system engineering framework that can support the breadth of necessary program and system contributions. By applying these needs to nearer-term lunar development, NASA will be instituting the process, procedures, and techniques needed to enable longer-term Mars goals and more. Some of the challenges being addressed in the M2M Strategy are associated with the architecture definition and include broad/changing goals, funding, and external pressures/influences. This document and the methodology outlined for architecture definition have been crafted to contend with these using an iterative and adaptable framework. The primary purpose of the Architecture Definition Document (ADD) is to capture the methodology, organization, and decomposition necessary to translate the broad objectives outlined in the M2M Strategy into functions and use cases that can be allocated to implementable programs and projects. Inherent in this process will be the need to communicate the long-term vision, maintain traceability to responsible parties, and iterate on the architectural implementation as innovations and solutions develop. This document will be updated and improved in conjunction with the Architecture Concept Review (ACR) which will be held annually to help unify the Agency and to get buy-in and input from across the Agency on the human exploration architecture. The annual nature of the process provides the opportunity to continually incorporate new developments in technologies and new partnerships, whether they be with industry, the U.S. Government, international entities, or academia.

Moon-to-Mars Strategy↗

NASA NTRS2022

NASA’s Strategic Analysis Cycle 2021 (SAC21) Human Mars Architecture

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Mars Architecture Team (MAT) was challenged to develop a mission architecture capable of transporting humans to the surface of Mars and back as fast—and as soon—as practical. This challenge represented a significant departure from previous approaches that minimized Earth-launched mass and maximized in-space transportation efficiency, often resulting in roundtrip missions of three years or more in duration. In the interest of crew health, MAT’s cross-Agency team of subject matter experts was challenged to develop an architecture capable of shortening crew time away from Earth to about two years. MAT was given specific mission constraints, such as number of crew, as well as mandates to minimize surface infrastructure as much as possible and to incorporate nuclear transportation options. The resulting MAT-developed concept, referred to here as the Strategic Analysis Cycle 2021 (SAC21) architecture, leverages Artemis elements and emerging commercial capabilities for cargo and logistics launches, and features a hybrid Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP)/Chemical transportation system able to complete the 1.8 billion kilometer round-trip journey to Mars and back in 760 to 850 days transit time for the 2039 Earth departure opportunity. Three Mars Descent Systems (MDS), each capable of landing about 25 metric tons of useful cargo on the surface of Mars, would be pre-deployed in advance of crew departure from Earth; two of these MDS’s would deliver a partially fueled Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), a fission power system, surface mobility, and additional MAV propellant. To minimize surface infrastructure, only two of the four Mars crew would descend and live in an MDS-landed pressurized rover, exploring the martian surface for 30 martian days, or sols, before returning to Mars orbit aboard their MAV and rejoining the other two crew on the Deep Space Transport for the Earth return voyage. Specifics of many of these architecture elements are detailed in separate technical publications; this paper outlines the end-to-end integrated architecture performance and concept of operations, including synergies with Artemis lunar architecture elements. It is important to note that NASA does not have a formal human Mars program and no decisions have been made; the architecture described here is intended to fill in an often-overlooked corner of the trade space, helping to complete the menu of options available to decision-makers as they chart the course for humans to Mars.

exploration↗

NASA NTRS1998

Manned Mars Landing

Following the first Apollo lunar landing mission in 1969, then Vice-President Spiro Agnew called upon NASA to prepare a plan in 30 days. The action was assigned to the newly formed Program Development Organization. A team was formed to prepare a plan which was completed on time and on August 4, 1969, the plan was presented to The Space Task Group (STG) at NASA HQ by Dr. Wernher Von Braun accompanied by Dr. William Lucas, Ron Harris and Gene Austin. The STG was headed by Dr. George Moeller, then AA in the Office of Manned Space Flight, and composed of other senior NASA officials. The charts in this book are copies of those used in the August 4, 1969 briefing. After this briefing, the MSFC attendees met privately with Dr. Moeller and received further comments/actions. The plan was worked further over the next few weeks and subsequently discussions were held with the Vice President and other White House staff members. While no blanket approval was given to the plan, the need for a reusable Space Shuttle was clearly indicated ass a first step ;in achieving the capability to assemble a Mars ship in Earth orbit. Dr. Moeller hence used this as a strong justification in his successful efforts to sell the Space Shuttle Program.

Mars↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Regenerative ECLSS and Logistics Analysis for Sustained Lunar Surface Missions

As NASA begins to develop concepts for sustained crew missions to the lunar surface, it will be essential to evaluate the logistics requirements needed to enable such missions. Lunar surface missions will involve crews of four astronauts living on the surface for periods of 30 days or longer. Astronauts will either live in a surface habitat or transfer between a habitat and a pressurized rover. The amount of logistics that must be delivered to the surface to support the crew, support the surface systems, and conduct science could be substantial. Because NASA plans to conduct these missions on an annual basis, the complexity and cost of logistics delivery will likely drive campaign sustainability. The amount of required logistics is partially a function of the ECLSS system in the habitable elements on the surface. The higher the capability of regenerative ECLSS that can be accommodated, the lower the logistics requirements. However, the increased regenerative ECLSS capabilities will also increase the initial delivery mass of elements and require additional maintenance and spares to maintain the systems. This paper describes an effort to evaluate lunar sustained logistics requirements, including sensitivity analysis for ECLSS architecture options and their impact on requirements. The authors determine logistics requirements using an integrated surface ECLSS model. The model considers different configurations of rover and habitat setups with multiple ECLSS options on both. The tool can also model gas and liquid transfer options between the habitat and the rover. The authors use the model to evaluate several different ECLSS configurations and their logistics requirements. The authors then complete a sensitivity analysis that compares logistic requirements and the initial delivery mass over increasing ECLSS capabilities. Finally, the authors make recommendations for an ECLSS architecture option that balances the tradeoffs between logistics requirements and ECLSS mass.

Environmental Control and Life Support↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Strategic Implications of Phobos as a Staging Point for Mars Surface Missions

As human exploration endeavors begin to set sights beyond low Earth orbit to the surface of the Moon, exploration of the surface of Mars continues to serve asthe “drivingdestination” to help focus development and research efforts. One Mars exploration strategy often discussed is the notion of utilizing the moons of Mars, namely Phobos,as an exploration destination prior toMars surface missions. This strategy is sometimes advocated based on the premisethat staging missions from Mars’ moons as well as exploring the moons themselves would be less costly and risky. However,understanding potential advantages of Phobos staging and exploration must be done in the context of the overall end-to-end Mars surface exploration needs, goals, objectives, campaign approach, and systems required. This paper examines the strategic implications of utilizing the moonsof Mars as a potential location for explorationof Mars. Operational concepts utilizing both Phobos and Mars orbital strategies will be examined to understand the architectural impacts of this staging strategy. The strategic implications of each operational concept are assessed to determine the overall key challenges and strategic links to other explorationdestinations. Results from this analysis indicate that,if the objective is to conduct Mars surface missions, utilizing Phobos as an exploration destination adds little benefittoward the goal of exploration of Mars.

Human↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Updated Human Mars Ascent Vehicle Concept in Support of NASA's Strategic Analysis Cycle 2021

NASA’s Artemis program has brought significant change to the agency’s human exploration strategy over the last several years. To better align with these policy changes, updates to several key ground rules and assumptions have been made to better support Strategic Analysis Cycle 2021 (SAC21). Of the changes, two in particular have had significant impact on the design of the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV): the desire for minimal surface infrastructure and reduced technology investments in support of initial human missions to Mars. As a result, recent designs for the MAV are based on a nitrogen tetroxide (NTO) and mono-methyl hydrazine (MMH) two stage propulsion system. The vehicle supports two crew members from the surface up to 84 hours nominally. This paper presents further details of the current MAV reference design used in NASA’s SAC21, including descriptions of the operations, configuration, subsystem design, and vehicle mass summary. Additional detail is also provided on rational that drove specific design changes since the last MAV concept, published in 2019.

Exploration↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization

This paper describes the current reference being used by NASA for the surface exploration portion of a human Mars mission architecture, documented in HEOMD-415. (It is important to note that no decisions have been made by NASA regarding human Mars mission objectives, durations, or architectures, and this document is intended to aid in analysis of options.) The HEOMD-415 report details constraints and considerations in planning daily activity timelines for crewed exploration on Mars. This work was done for the purpose of estimating how much time during each martian sol might be available for exploration activities, (also referred to as utilization activities in this document), after accounting for time needed for crew and equipment care. The report describes activities, on a sol-by-sol basis, for a surface exploration mission with a total duration of 30 sols on the surface. At the conclusion of this description, the total amount of time used in the activities is presented, summarized into relevant mission planning categories. In addition, the amount of time used specifically for extravehicular activities (EVAs) is gathered in a tabular form, showing the amount of time by sol and by crewmember that resulted from this analysis. As future analyses related to this surface mission are conducted, these summary results will be updated and revisions of the document will be released.

Mars↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization

This presentation was made at the “COSPAR Planetary Protection Knowledge Gaps for Human Missions to Mars” virtual workshop. As the workshop title implies, the presentation is intended to explain basic features of current human Mars surface mission scenarios being analyzed by NASA. The specific scenario details described is documented in HEOMD-415 “Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization.” Other workshop presentations will expand on details related to scientific investigations that could have planetary protection impacts.

Mars↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Mars 101

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Mars↗