Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Meyer, R. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Meyer, R. T..

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1984

Allowable response delay for large aircraft

The degree of permissible time delay in an airliner flight control system is presently sought by means of a pilot-in-the-loop moving base flight simulator, assuming the characteristics of an advanced L-1011 aircraft variant. Test pilots and engineers from the U.S. Navy, the airliner manufacturer, and NASA Langley were used in a task which encompassed approach and landing after recovery from offsets in localizer and glide slope, during calm, turbulent, and cross-wind conditions. The data obtained in the course of 279 runs included statistics on pilot workload and performance as well as pilot opinion. Preliminary results indicate that requirements for a 0.1-sec maximum delay in aircraft response are excessively conservative for large aircraft, where an offset landing maneuver is the critical design task. Lateral axis delays appear to be more critical than longitudinal ones.

Meyer, R. T.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Multibody aircraft study, volume 1

The potential benefits of a multibody aircraft when compared to a single body aircraft are presented. The analyses consist principally of a detailed point design analysis of three multibody and one single body aircraft, based on a selected payload of 350,000 kg (771,618 lb), for final aircraft definitions; sensitivity studies to evaluate the effects of variations in payload, wing semispan body locations, and fuel price; recommendations as to the research and technology requirements needed to validate the multibody concept. Two, two body, one, three body, and one single body aircraft were finalized for the selected payload, with DOC being the prime figure of merit. When compared to the single body, the multibody aircraft showed a reduction in DOC by as much as 11.3 percent. Operating weight was reduced up to 14 percent, and fly away cost reductions ranged from 8.6 to 13.4 percent. Weight reduction, hence cost, of the multibody aircraft resulted primarily from the wing bending relief afforded by the bodies being located outboard on the wing.

Moore, J. W.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Multibody aircraft study, volume 2

The potential benefits of a multibody aircraft when compared to a single body aircraft are presented. The analyses consist principally of a detailed point design analysis of three multibody and one single body aircraft, based on a selected payload of 350,000 kg (771,618 lb), for final aircraft definitions; sensitivity studies to evaluate the effects of variations in payload, wing semispan body locations, and fuel price; recommendations as to the research and technology requirements needed to validate the multibody concept. Two, two body, one, three body, and one single body aircraft were finalized for the selected payload, with DOC being the prime figure of merit. When compared to the single body, the multibody aircraft showed a reduction in DOC by as much as 11.3 percent. Operating weight was reduced up to 14 percent, and fly away cost reductions ranged from 8.6 to 13.4 percent. Weight reduction, hence cost, of the multibody aircraft resulted primarily from the wing bending relief afforded by the bodies being located outboard on the wing.

Moore, J. W.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Evaluation of advanced lift concepts and fuel conservative short-haul aircraft, volume 1

The performance and economics of a twin-engine augmentor wing airplane were evaluated in two phases. Design aspects of the over-the-wing/internally blown flap hybrid, augmentor wing, and mechanical flap aircraft were investigated for 910 m. field length with parametric extension to other field lengths. Fuel savings achievable by application of advanced lift concepts to short-haul aircraft were evaluated and the effect of different field lengths, cruise requirements, and noise levels on fuel consumption and airplane economics at higher fuel prices were determined. Conclusions and recommendations are presented.

Renshaw, J. H.↗