Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Meeroff, Jamie G.

Publications and source records attributed to Meeroff, Jamie G..

8 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2019

Building Booster Separation Aerodynamic Databases for Artemis II

NASA’s Artemis II mission will mark the return of humans to near-lunar space for the first time since Apollo. Shortly after launch on the Space Launch System (SLS), a critical phase of ascent occurs when 16 small rockets fire to push the boosters away from the core. Minimizing the risk of failure during separation requires the construction of multiple 13-dimensional databases, including perturbations in position, flight conditions, and engine thrust. The SLS Computational Fluid Dynamics team used NASA’s FUN3D flow solver on the Pleiades and Electra supercomputers to run 5,780 simulations at nominal conditions and over 8,000 simulations with a core stage engine failure to generate the databases needed to verify the booster separation system for Artemis II.

Meeroff, Jamie G.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Space Launch System Booster Separation Supersonic Powered Testing with Surface and Off-Body Measurements

A wind tunnel test was run in the NASA Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel simulating the separation of the two solid rocket boosters (SRB) from the core stage of the NASA Space Launch System (SLS). The test was run on a 0.9% scale model of the SLS Block 1B Cargo (27005) configuration and the SLS Block 1B Crew (28005) configuration at a Mach of 4.0. High pressure air was used to simulate plumes from the booster separation motors located at the nose and aft skirt of the two boosters. Force and moment data were taken on both SRBs and on the core stage. Schlieren still photos and video were recorded throughout testing. A set of points were acquired using Cross-correlation Doppler Global Velocimetry (CCDGV) readings to get 3 component velocity measurements between the core and the left-hand SRB. The CCDGV laser was utilized to record flow visualization in the same location, between the core and the left-hand SRB. Pressure Sensitive Paint data were taken on a separate set of runs. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) runs were computed on a subset of the wind tunnel data points for comparison. A combination of the force/moment, CCDGV and Pressure Sensitive Paint (PSP) data (as well as schlieren images) at the CFD-specified test conditions will be used te the CFD simulations that will be used to build an SLS booster separation database flight conditions.

Winski, Courtney S.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Comparison of Space Launch System Aerodynamic Surface Pressure Measurements from Experimental Testing and CFD

A comparison of surface pressure coefficient measurements obtained using pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) measurements with predictions from the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code FUN3D is presented for the NASA SLS Block 1B crew vehicle. Overall, the flow features over the SLS configuration were captured by both the PSP data and CFD data at freestream Mach numbers (M(sub ∞)) of 0.8 and 1.3. Overall, the flow features over the SLS are captured by the PSP data but the intensities of large pressure gradients are less intense than what was predicted by the CFD data. Several examples of this observation are given including the flow interaction at the booster nose cone edge, core body, and forward booster attachment hardware at M(sub ∞) = 0.8.

FUN3D↗
NASA NTRS2018

Ascent Aerodynamic Force and Moment Database Development for the Space Launch System

The Space Launch System Aerodynamics Task Team is responsible for delivering aerodynamic force and moment databases from liftoff through ascent until the rocket leaves the Earth’s atmosphere. The process for developing the ascent portion of this database is described in the current paper. The data used to develop the database were generated using a combination of wind tunnel testing and CFD simulations. The details of the wind tunnel testing performed at the NASA Ames Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel and CFD simulations performed using FUN3D at wind tunnel and flight conditions are discussed, and comparisons of these data sets are provided. The methods used for converting the source data into the final database response surfaces with corresponding uncertainty are also detailed.

Shea, Patrick R.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Adjustments and Uncertainty Quantification for SLS Aerodynamic Sectional Loads

This paper presents a method for adjusting sectional loads to match target values for integrated force and moment coefficients. In a typical application, the sectional load profile for one flight condition is calculated from Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) while the integrated forces and moments are measured in a wind tunnel experiment. These two methods do not generally result in identical predictions, and this leads to an inherent inconsistency between different data products. This paper aims to provide a procedure to remove that inconsistency. A sectional load profile for a launch vehicle splits the rocket into slices along its length and calculates the aerodynamic loading on each slice, which leads to a one-dimensional aerodynamic load profile that is used for structural analysis. Adjusting sectional loads, also known as line loads, is a nontrivial matter due to several consistency constraints. For example, the adjusted sectional normal force profile must be consistent with both the integrated normal force and pitching moment. To avoid such inconsistency issues, this paper presents a method using a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) to generate basis functions to adjust the sectional load profiles. As a corollary, this correction method enables the creation of an uncertainty quantification for sectional loads that is consistent with the dispersed integrated force and moment database and its uncertainty quantification. Several extensions to this technique, such as applying the method to the surface pressures, are considered.

Quantification↗