Engineering topics

Medeiros, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Medeiros, B..

3 records

DOE OSTI2023

Evaluating the Simulation of CONUS Precipitation by Storm Type in E3SM

Abstract Conventional low‐resolution (LR) climate models, including the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv1), have well‐known biases in simulating the frequency, intensity, and timing of precipitation. Approaches to next‐generation E3SM, whether the high‐resolution (HR) or multiscale modeling framework (MMF) configuration, improve the simulation of the intensity and frequency of precipitation, but regional and seasonal deficiencies still exist. Here we apply a methodology to assess the contribution of tropical cyclones (TCs), extratropical cyclones (ETCs), and mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) to simulated precipitation in E3SMv1‐HR and E3SMv1‐MMF relative to E3SMv1‐LR. Across the United States, E3SMv1‐MMF provides the best simulation in terms of precipitation accumulation, frequency and intensity from MCSs and TCs compared to E3SMv1‐LR and E3SMv1‐HR. All E3SMv1 configurations overestimate precipitation amounts from and the frequency of ETCs over CONUS, with conventional E3SMv1‐LR providing the best simulation compared to observations despite limitations in precipitation intensity within these events.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2021

Cloud-Feedback Model Intercomparison Project: Tier 2 Simulations (Final Report)

The University of Miami (Subcontractor)’s Research Scientist James Benedict (with oversight by PI Amy Clement) was tasked with producing global climate model simulations as part of the Cloud-Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) Tier 2 protocol, managing the output of these simulations, providing assistance (as requested) to staff at Lawrence Livermore National Lab (LLNL) regarding model output and setup, and meeting with LLNL scientists and team members to coordinate work on the project. The simulations represent an important contribution to the CFMIP data repository and will advance understanding of a wide range of critical cloud, circulation, and precipitation responses to climate change. The Subcontractor completed all proposed simulations, formatted the model output to be compliant with CFMIP protocols, and published the model data to the CFMIP repository. When requested, the Subcontractor provided assistance to LLNL for model output and configuration queries. Benedict and/or Clement also met in person or virtually 1-2 times per year with project scientists to coordinate work and review results.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2020

Mean Climate and Tropical Rainfall Variability in Aquaplanet Simulations Using the Model for Prediction Across Scales‐Atmosphere

Abstract Aquaplanet experiments are important tools for understanding and improving physical processes simulated by global models; yet, previous aquaplanet experiments largely differ in their representation of subseasonal tropical rainfall variability. This study presents results from aquaplanet experiments produced with the Model for Prediction Across Scales‐Atmosphere (MPAS‐A)—a community model specifically designed to study weather and climate in a common framework. The mean climate and tropical rainfall variability simulated by MPAS‐A with varying horizontal resolution were compared against results from a recent suite of aquaplanet experiments. This comparison shows that, regardless of horizontal resolution, MPAS‐A produces the expected mean climate of an aquaplanet framework with zonally symmetric but meridionally varying sea‐surface temperature. MPAS‐A, however, has a stronger signal of tropical rainfall variability driven by convectively coupled equatorial waves. Sensitivity experiments with different cumulus parameterizations, physics packages, and vertical grids consistently show the presence of those waves, especially equatorial Kelvin waves, in phase with lower‐tropospheric convergence. Other models do not capture such rainfall‐kinematics phasing. These results suggest that simulated tropical rainfall variability depends not only on the cumulus parameterization (as suggested by previous studies) but also on the coupling between physics and dynamics of climate and weather prediction models.

Rios‐Berrios, R.↗