Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

McDonell, Vincent

Publications and source records attributed to McDonell, Vincent.

Design, Analysis, and Experimental Testing of Hydrogen Lean Direct Injection Nozzles at Elevated Pressure

Abstract There are many challenges of commissioning a hydrogen combustor into future gas turbine engines; especially regarding achieving emissions goals. Previously, Escudero et al. and Tran et al. conducted a study to adapt the liquid fuel Lean Direct Injection (LDI) concept from Jet-A to gaseous natural gas-hydrogen blends and pure hydrogen [1], [2]. Experimental data was collected at atmospheric conditions using a Box Behnken design of experiments. The design of experiments suggested that biasing the air split in favor of the inner air circuit and increasing the swirl strength of this inner air passage resulted in improved NOx emissions, while the inverse was true for stability, which was quantified by studying the lean blowoff point (LBO) [1], [2]. The trends revealed by the original experiment [1], [2] provided a design direction for further iterations of the experimental hardware. The study presented herein describes the further investigation of such LDI injectors through experimental methods and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations at atmospheric conditions, which were used to identify potential flow behaviors driving enhanced emissions performance. Further evaluation of select injectors from both studies was then conducted at elevated pressures up to 6 atmospheres. The results from both experiments are presented in this study, which include flame observations, emissions measurements, and operational challenges. NOx emissions results are reported on a volume basis in ppmvd corrected to 15% O2 and corrected for fuel. A predictive model for relating NOx emissions to test conditions at atmospheric conditions show high significance to adiabatic flame temperature while little to no significance to fuel composition for the best performing configurations. The results illustrate the connection between atmospheric testing and testing elevated pressures. The design direction indicated by the initial tests and CFD results in promising configurations for implementation into a Multi-point LDI array.

08 HYDROGEN↗

GT2023 Front Matter

Abstract The front matter for this proceedings is available by clicking on the PDF icon.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Reactor Network Analysis with Various Reaction Mechanisms to Investigate Hydrogen vs. Methane Fuel at Varying Flame Temperatures with Experimental Data

Emissions data were evaluated for a set of test hardware that adapts Collins Aerospace’s aeroengine liquid fueled injector technology to a ground-based turbine. The hardware was specifically developed to operate on 100% hydrogen; however it has the ability to operate on both pure methane and hydrogen and mixtures in between. 16 injector configurations and seven factors (air split, fuel and air swirl, pressure drop, preheat temperature, fuel composition, and flame temperature) were investigated based on a Box Behnken statistical model. Of the 16, configuration 3 was selected for further discussion being in the middle of the statistical design space. A chemical reactor network was developed based on the experimental data obtained and was assessed with three different mechanisms: GRI Mech 3.0, UCSD, and Galway. All factors were held constant except the fuel composition to directly compare chemical pathways for methane and hydrogen. This study was conducted across different flame temperatures of 1500K, 1675K, and 1850K for both hydrogen and methane. Additional lower flame temperatures of 1100K and 1300K were evaluated for hydrogen. Moreover, results for fully premixed and non-premixed results were compared to obtain information on the implications of mixedness on emissions. These results were compared with the Leonard and Stegmaier plot for methane and a similar plot was constructed for hydrogen.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Image Characterization of Reactions Generated by an Aeroengine Micromixing Injector for Lean Direct Injection of Hydrogen and Hydrogen/Natural Gas Blend

An aeroengine micromixing injector, originally designed for lean direct injection of jet fuel, was adapted to work with hydrogen, natural gas, and any blend in between. The ultimate goal of the design was to achieve low NOx emissions when operated on pure hydrogen; to better characterize its performance, flame imaging diagnostics was implemented. Three types of cameras mounted parallel to the injector base and pointing towards the quartz combustor cylinder with the same angle were operated simultaneously: Nikon D90, Dynacolor FB-N9-U, and Phantom v7.1, to capture the visible spectrum, OH* chemiluminescence, and dynamic behavior of the flames, respectively. The current work also includes the overlapping of visible spectrum and OH* chemiluminescence, as an effort to qualitatively define the heat release over the flame area, i.e., UV over visible domain. Additionally, a z-type schlieren configuration was employed to reinforce the presence of some small-scale details occurring near the injector outlet ports. Using the airbox pressure drop, preheat temperature, fuel composition and flame temperature as the factors of study, a Box Behnken model was designed yielding into a 16-points matrix for the operability region, at atmospheric pressure. The main responses were extracted from the OH* images, because of its correlation with the flame heat release, these being the flame area and its average brightness, the heat release area and its center of gravity and leading edge. To assess the importance of the main factors and their interactions, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for each response, considering as significant each contributor with a p-value below 0.05. For these five responses it was found that all four main factors need to be included into the model (most of them because its own significance, others to ensure the model hierarchy), as well as some common interactions as the preheat and flame temperatures or pressure drop and fuel composition, and quadratic terms from fuel composition or flame temperature. Three of the five models presented R2 and coefficient of variance (C.V.) indicators around 0.97 and 5%, respectively; the leading edge ANOVA yielded into R2=0.78 and C.V.=18.88%; and the heat release area showed R2=0.91 and C.V.=24.13%. Lastly, the confinement ratio effect of the combustor over the flame structure was quantified, for three different conditions: the original 80 mm inner diameter and 200 mm length cylinder was compared against a shorter 150 mm tube (same inner diameter) and a narrower 47 mm inner diameter one (same 200 mm length). The length had a smaller effect than the inner diameter, even though both factors were not strong enough to make a significant deviation on most of the flame parameters: the difference was within the repeatability margin of error for the brightness, flame area, and center of gravity and leading edge of the heat release area.

Imaging diagnostics, flame characterization, OH* c↗