Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Mason, Taylor

Publications and source records attributed to Mason, Taylor.

Insight into the interfacial microstructure and chemistry of hot isostatically pressed AA6061-AA6061 bonds for U-10Mo fuel cladding application

Here, in the present study, hot isostatic pressing (HIP) bonding was carried out using AA6061-AA6061 plates for U-10Mo monolithic fuel cladding application. HIP was performed at 560°C with an applied isostatic pressure of 103 MPa for 90 min. Interfacial microstructure characterizations were performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) to quantify precipitate fractions and study recrystallization, grain growth, and orientation relationships across the interface. EBSD results confirmed that no interfacial grain growth occurred during the HIP process. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was also employed to quantify composition and identify phases of various precipitates and an oxide layer that formed at the interface during HIP bonding. Microstructural analyses revealed the formation of a large fraction of Mg 2 Si precipitate and a ~50 nm thick Mg-oxide layer at the interface. Further TEM analysis confirmed that the oxide layer was not continuous, and Mg 2 Al 2 O 5 oxide particles with an average size of 18 nm were present in the oxide layer. Finite element modeling analysis was performed to study the stress distribution at the interface during HIP processing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Final Seismic Shake Table Test Plan

The Spent Fuel Waste Disposition (SFWD) program is planning to conduct a full-scale seismic shake table test on the dry storage systems of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) to close the gap related to seismic loads on fuel assemblies in dry storage systems. This test will allow for quantifying the strains and accelerations on surrogate fuel assembly hardware and cladding during earthquakes of different magnitudes and frequency content. Full-scale testing is needed because a dry storage system is a complex and highly nonlinear system making it hard to predict (model) the responses to seismic excitations. The non-linearity arises from the multiple spatial gaps in the system – between fuel rods and the basket, between the basket and dry storage canister, between the dry storage canister and the storage cask (overpack), and ventilation gaps. The non-linearities pose significant limitations on the value of tests with scaled systems.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗