Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Mariano Moscato

Publications and source records attributed to Mariano Moscato.

12 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

Towards an Implementation of Differential Dynamic Logic in PVS

This paper describes an ongoing effort to embed and verify differential dynamic logic (dL) in the Prototype Verification System (PVS). dL is a logic for specifying and formally reasoning about hybrid systems, which employ both continuous and discrete dynamics. There are several benefits of this effort. First, the embedding of dL in PVS offers an independent formal verification of the semantics and rules of dL. Second, the embedding is fully operational within PVS, giving PVS practitioners the ability to use dL in the formal specification and verification process. Third, the rich specification language, type system, and powerful interactive prover of PVS can be used on dL objects. In addition to the embedding and verification of dL, a custom extension for Visual Studio Code has been developed, so that a stylized dL syntax can be used to specify hybrid programs and their properties.

Differential Dynamic Logic↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

PRECiSA: a static analysis tool for floating-point programs

This presentation introduces PRECiSA, a static analysis framework for analyzing floating-point programs. PRECiSA computes round-off error bounds for a class of floating-point programs, and produces a formal proof certificate of the correctness of these bounds. PRECiSA also has the capability of generating C code which is instrumented to detect unstable branching conditions from a real-number algorithm specification.

Floating-point↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Formal Analysis of the Compact Position Reporting Algorithm

This presentation documents the formal analysis of the compact position reporting (CPR) algorithm. CPR is a fundamental part of Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B), which is a global protocol for aircraft communication. The formal analysis found and corrected issues with the algorithm, proposed simplifications, and created a formally verified reference implementation, all of which are incorporated in the governing standards document.

Formal Methods↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Embedding Differential Dynamic Logic in PVS

Differential dynamic logic (dL) is a formal framework for specifying and reasoning about hybrid systems, i.e., dynamical systems that exhibit both continuous and discrete behaviors. These kinds of systems arise in many safety- and mission-critical applications. This paper presents a formalization of dL in the Prototype Verification System (PVS) that includes the semantics of hybrid programs and dL’s proof calculus. The formalization embeds dL into the PVS logic, resulting in a version of dL whose proof calculus is not only formally verified, but is also available for the verification of hybrid programs within PVS itself. This embedding, called Plaidypvs (Properly Assured Implementation of dL for Hybrid Program Verification and Specification), supports standard dL style proofs, but further leverages the capabilities of PVS to allow reasoning about entire classes of hybrid programs. The embedding also allows the user to import the well-established definitions and mathematical theories available in PVS.

PVS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Embedding Differential Dynamic Logic in PVS

Runtime assurance is a control framework where a complex controller operates under the observation of a monitor. If the monitor detects the controller exhibiting undesirable behavior, control is passed off to a trusted controller until a desirable state is regained. The runtime assurance architecture provides a layer of assurance to the system being controlled, but special care must be taken that the resulting overall system, consisting of the monitors and controllers, is behaving as intended. This talk aims to formally model and reason about runtime assurance-equipped systems as hybrid programs- which are models that consist of both discrete and continuous components. Using the verification tool Plaidypvs, safety properties of some examples involving RTA architectures is shown.

Formal Verification↗