Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Macdonald, Daniel

Publications and source records attributed to Macdonald, Daniel.

Microwave Annealing for Fast and Effective Hydrogen Activation in Polycrystalline Silicon Passivating Contacts

Hydrogenation is a crucial step in the fabrication of high-efficiency silicon solar cells. In this study, the effectiveness of hydrogen activation is demonstrated via microwave annealing of hydrogen-rich dielectrics coated on poly-Si passivating contacts. This method is compared with conventional hydrogenation techniques, such as annealing in N2 in the presence of a hydrogen-rich source (such as hydrogenated aluminum oxide (AlOx:H), hydrogenated silicon nitride (SiNy:H), or a AlOx:H/SiNy:H stack). Key improvements observed include a reduction in J0 from 30 to <5 fA cm-2, an increase in iVoc from 690 to >730 mV, and an enhancement in effective lifetime (teff) from 0.6 to ~3.5 milliseconds on phosphorus-doped poly-Si/SiO2 passivating contact samples. With a very short annealing time of ~1-2 min, the samples passivated by AlOx:H, SiNy:H, or the stack show similar performance to samples subjected to 30 min of nitrogen annealing. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra corroborate the findings regarding the hydrogenation of the poly-Si layer and the c-Si substrate, with an increase in PL intensity after microwave annealing. Ultimately, this work suggests that microwave annealing could be a promising addition, offering flexibility to traditional firing hydrogenation processes.

hydrogenation↗

Effect of Iron Contamination and Polysilicon Gettering on the Performance of Polysilicon‐Based Passivating Contact Solar Cells

Over the past decade, silicon solar cells with carrier-selective passivating contacts based on polysilicon capping an ultra-thin silicon oxide (commonly known as TOPCon or POLO) have demonstrated promising efficiency potentials and are regarded as an evolutionary upgrade to the PERC (passivated emitter and rear contact) cells in manufacturing. The polysilicon-based passivating contacts also exhibit excellent gettering effects that relax the wafer and cleanroom requirements to some extent. Here, in this work, we experimentally explore the impact of bulk iron contamination and polysilicon gettering on the passivation quality of the polysilicon/oxide structure and the resulting solar cells performance. Results show that both n- and p-type polysilicon/oxide passivating contacts are not affected by iron gettering, demonstrating robust and stable passivation quality. However, for a very high bulk iron contamination (1 × 10 13 cm −3 ), the accumulated iron in the p-type lightly boron-doped emitter in crystalline silicon would degrade the emitter saturation current density. This can cause a reduction in both open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current. Meanwhile, this very high iron content (1 × 10 13 cm −3 ) can further degrade the fill factor and temperature coefficient of the cells. On the other hand, for an initial iron content of 2 × 10 12 cm −3 , which should be well above the iron level in the current industrial Czochralski silicon wafers, the resulting cells demonstrate similar performance as the control group with no intentional iron contamination. This work brings attention to both the benefits of polysilicon gettering effects as well as the potential degradation due to the accumulation of metal impurities in the p-type emitter region.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Investigation of Gallium–Boron Spin-On Codoping for poly-Si/SiO x Passivating Contacts

A doping technique for p-type poly-Si/SiOx passivating contacts using a spin-on method for different mixtures of Ga and B glass solutions is presented. Effects of solution mixing ratios on the contact performance (implied open circuit voltage iV oc , contact resistivity ..rho..c) are investigated. For all as-annealed samples at different drive-in temperatures, increasing the percentage of Ga in the solution shows a decrement in iV oc (from ~680 to ~610 mV) and increment in ..rho..c (from ~3 to ~800 mO cm 2 ). After a hydrogenation treatment by depositing a SiN x /AlO x stack followed by forming gas annealing, all samples show improved iVoc (~700 mV with Ga-B co-doped, and ~720 mV with all Ga). Interestingly, when co-doping Ga with B, even a small amount of B in the mixing solution shows negative effects on the surface passivation. Active and total dopant profiles obtained by electrical capacitance voltage and secondary-ion mass spectrometry measurements, respectively, reveal a relatively low percentage of electrically-active Ga and B in the poly-Si and Si layers. Overall, these results help understand the different features of the two dopants: a low ρ c with B, a good passivation with Ga, their degree of activation inside the poly-Si and Si layers, and the annealing effects.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Morphology, microstructure, and doping behaviour: A comparison between different deposition methods for poly-Si/SiO x passivating contacts

In this work, we study how crystallographic structures, optoelectronic properties, and nanoscale surface morphologies of ex situ phosphorus-doped polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si)/SiO x passivating contacts, formed by different deposition methods (sputtering, plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition [PECVD], and low-pressure chemical vapour deposition [LPCVD]), are investigated and compared. Across all these deposition technologies, we noted the same trend: higher diffusion temperatures yield films that are more crystalline but that have rougher surface morphologies due to bigger surface crystal grains. Also, the recrystallization process of the as-deposited Si films starts from the SiO x interface, rather than from the film surface and bulk. However, there are some distinct differences among these technologies. First, the LPCVD method yields the lowest deposition rate, roughest surfaces, and smallest degree of crystallinity on finished poly-Si films. In contrast, the PECVD method has the highest deposition rate and smoothest surfaces for both as-deposited Si and annealed poly-Si films. Second, as-deposited sputtered and PECVD Si films contain only an amorphous phase, whereas as-deposited LPCVD films already has some crystalline phase. Third, the LPCVD phosphorus in-diffusion into the substrate depends strongly on the initial film thickness, whereas for the other two methods, it is weakly dependent on thickness. Finally, the passivation quality of every poly-Si film type has different responses to the film thickness and diffusion temperature, suggesting that the ex situ doping optimization should be performed independently.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗