Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Levine, Jack

Publications and source records attributed to Levine, Jack.

8 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1995

NASA technology flight experiments program

In addition to its scientific and life sciences experimental programs, NASA conducts flight experiments directed at development of space systems technologies. The experiments are conducted to obtain research data, to evaluate the performance or operation of experimental hardware in the space environment, or to validate components, subsystems, or systems prior to application in future spacecraft or missions. The requirements for specific technology experiments, and the priority assigned to them, vary significantly depending on the maturity of the technology. Some of the flight experiments address technologies still in the early research stage, while others are conducted to validate technology at relatively advanced levels of maturity. This paper discusses the overall technology flight experiments program and reports in some detail on four current or recently flown experiments ranging from research to technology validation at the system prototype level.

Pruscha, Stephen L.↗
NASA NTRS1994

NASA Technology Flight Experiments Program

In addition to its scientific and life sciences experimental programs, NASA conducts flight experiments directed at development of space systems technologies. The experiments are conducted to obtain research data, to evaluate the performance or operation of experimental hardware in the space environment, or to validate components, subsystems, or systems prior to application in future spacecraft or missions. The requirements for specific technology experiments, and the priority assigned to them, vary significantly depending on the maturity of the technology. Some of the flight experiments address technologies still in the early research stage, while others are conducted to validate technology at relatively advanced levels of maturity. This paper discusses the overall technology flight experiments program and reports in some detail on four current or recently flown experiments ranging from research to technology validation at the system prototype level.

flight↗
NASA NTRS1988

Future directions in technology development - Increased use of space as a facility

As human activities in space continue to grow in size and scope, the role of in-space technology experiments, as a necessary tool for essential technological development, will also grow. NASA has recognized the increasing importance of such experiments, and has instituted programs to plan, organize, and coordinate future in-space technology experiment activities within the overall space community. This paper discusses the history of in-space technology experiments, and expected future trends. It also describes NASA activities in this growing area of experimentation, and provides several examples of such experiments.

Ambrus, Judith H.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Flight projects overview

Information is given in viewgraph form on the activities of the Flight Projects Division of NASA's Office of Aeronautics and Space Technology. Information is given on space research and technology strategy, current space flight experiments, the Long Duration Exposure Facility, the Orbiter Experiment Program, the Lidar In-Space Technology Experiment, the Ion Auxiliary Propulsion System, the Arcjet Flight Experiment, the Telerobotic Intelligent Interface Flight Experiment, the Cryogenic Fluid Management Flight Experiment, the Industry/University In-Space Flight Experiments, and the Aeroassist Flight Experiment.

Levine, Jack↗
NASA NTRS1988

Overview of the US/UK ASTOVL program

An account is given of progress to date in a US/UK advanced, supersonic flight-capable, powered-lift aircraft development collaborative effort formalized in January, 1986 by a memorandum of understanding (MOU). MOU-related work has investigated such ASTOVL propulsion configuration concepts as the remote augmented lift system, using a two-mode powerplant; augmenting ejectors, which generate a more benign ground environment; plenum chamber burning vectored thrust, which elaborates the geometry of the Harrier Pegasus powerplant; and tandem fans, which are also closely related to the Harrier concept but incorporate a truly variable-cycle engine.

Armstrong, Frank W.↗
NASA NTRS1960

Flight Performance of a Spin-Stabilized 20-Inch-Diameter Solid-Propellant Spherical Rocket Motor

A successful flight test of a spin-stabilized 20-inch-diameter solid-propellant rocket motor having a propellant mass fraction of 0.92 has been made. The motor was fired at altitude after being boosted by a three-stage test vehicle. Analysis of the data indicates that a total impulse of 44,243 pound-second with a propellant specific impulse of approximately 185 was achieved over a total action time of about 12 seconds. These results are shown to be in excellent agreement with data from ground static firing tests of these motors. The spherical rocket motor with an 11-pound payload attained a velocity of 15,620 feet per second (m = 16.7) with an incremental velocity increase for the spherical motor stage of 12,120 feet per second.

Levine, Jack↗
NASA NTRS1958

Heat-Transfer Measurements on a 5.5- Inch-Diameter Hemispherical Concave Nose in Free Flight at Mach Numbers up to 6.6

The aerodynamic heat transfer to a hemispherical concave nose has been measured in free flight at Mach numbers from 3.5 to 6.6 with corresponding Reynolds numbers based on nose diameter from 7.4 x 10(exp 6) to 14 x 10(exp 6). Over the test Mach number range the heating on the cup nose, expressed as a ratio to the theoretical stagnation-point heating on a hemisphere nose of the same diameter, varied from 0.05 to 0.13 at the stagnation point of the cup, was approximately 0.1 at other locations within 40 deg of the stagnation point, and varied from 0.6 to 0.8 just inside the lip where the highest heating rates occurred. At a Mach number of 5 the total heat input integrated over the surface of the cup nose including the lip was 0.55 times the theoretical value for a hemisphere nose with laminar boundary layer and 0.76 times that for a flat face. The heating at the stagnation point was approximately 1/5 as great as steady-flow tunnel results. Extremely high heating rates at the stagnation point (on the order of 30 times the stagnation-point values of the present test), which have occurred in conjunction with unsteady oscillatory flow around cup noses in wind-tunnel tests at Mach and Reynolds numbers within the present test range, were not observed.

Levine, Jack↗