Engineering topics

Lamont, Alan

Publications and source records attributed to Lamont, Alan.

4 records

DOE OSTI2014

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Robust Unit Commitment

This report summarizes the procedure to compare the robust UC approach with the deterministic counterpart. The procedure involves solving the robust and deterministic UC problems under various scenario configurations, and then performing system dispatch simulations under each UC solution to generate economic and operational performance measures. The report describes the parallelization process for solving UC problems as well as for running system dispatch simulations. The report also summarizes the statistical model used for generating Monte Carlo simulation samples and forming forecast ranges used in the robust UC approach. Some key findings are discussed as well. In particular, the economic and operational performance of the robust and deterministic approaches is compared under different 1) conservatism levels or the sizes of forecast range, 2) the wind penetration levels, and 3) the mixture of load and wind behaviors.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

DOE OSTI2013

The Value of Storage and Demand Response for Renewble Integration

Increased contributions from wind and solar power resources are necessary to meet California’s goal to use 33 percent renewable energy by 2020. Using these renewable resources, however, will substantially increase the variability and uncertainty in electricity generation resources available to California’s electricity grid operators. Automated demand response and energy storage systems can help reduce this variability and uncertainty through energy buying and selling (arbitrage) in day-ahead markets that would levelize loads and prices throughout the day. They could also provide load-following capability through bids in the real-time market and system management (or regulation) services to the system operator. The project identified policies, technologies (energy storage), and control methods (demand response) that could reduce the cost and improve the reliability of electric power for California ratepayers. Data and assumptions describing energy storage and demand response resources were provided by the Electric Power Research Institute, the California Energy Storage Alliance, and the Demand Response Research Center. The California Independent System Operator provided the production simulation model and supporting data.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2011

Using Supercomputers to Speed Execution of the CAISO/PLEXOS 33% RPS Study

The study's official title is 'ISO Study of Operational Requirements and Market Impacts at 33% Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS).' The stated objectives are twofold: (1) identifying operational requirements and resource options to reliably operate the ISO-controlled grid under a 33% RPS in 2020; and (2) inform market, planning, and policy/regulatory decisions by the ISO, state agencies, market participants, and other stakeholders. The first of these objectives requires the hourly estimates of integration requirements, measured in terms of operational ramp, load following and regulation capacity and ramp rates, as well as additional capacity to resolve operational violations. It also involves consideration of other variables that affect the results, such as the impact of different mixes of renewable technologies, and the impact of forecasting error and variability. The second objective entails supporting the CPUC to identify long-term procurement planning needs, costs, and options, as well as informing other decisions made by the CPUC and state agencies. For the ISO itself this includes informing state-wide transmission planning needs for renewables up to a 33% RPS, and informing design of wholesale markets for energy and ancillary services to facilitate provision of integration capacities. The study is designed in two phases. The first (current) phase is focused on operational requirements and addressing these requirements with existing and new conventional fossil generation; for instance, gas turbines and/or combined cycle units. The second (planned) phase will address the same operational requirements with a combination of conventional fossil generation resources, new non-generation resources, and a renewable resource dispatch. There are seven different scenarios considered in the current phase: a 20% RPS reference case; four 33% RPS cases (a reference case, a high out-of-state case, a high distributed generation case, and a low load case); an alternative 27.5% RPS case; and an all-gas case (no new renewables after 2008). In addition, the CPUC is planning a new set of cases that will alter the anticipated sets of runs.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

DOE OSTI2010

Scoping Memo Response

What follows is a response to the questions posed in the May 21, 2010 document "Assigned Commissioner's Ruling and Scoping Memo, Phase 1", pertaining to Rulemaking 09-11-014, also referred to as the "Scoping Memo". The questions refer to the specific components of the CPUC Energy Efficiency (EE) Evaluation, Measurement, and Verification (EM&V) program, currently in its 2010-2012 cycle. In the Scoping Memo, there was reference to the need to update the policy and methodological framework of EM&V, due to changes in law (AB32), policy (California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan), the availability of new data, and challenges to previous EM&V cycles.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗