Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Kuehn, Norma

Publications and source records attributed to Kuehn, Norma.

15 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture and Exhaust Gas Recycle

This is a presentation given at the 3rd International Conference on Energy and Environment. The presentation highlights analysis work conducted by NETL to assess the cost and performance for natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants that incorporate solvent-based post combustion carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and exhaust gas recycle (EGR). Increasing the inlet CO2 concentration by EGR is expected to improve the efficiency of the capture system and reduce its cost, however the analysis results show that the cost improvement is minimal as is the cost of capture reduction.

Hackett, Gregory↗
DOE OSTI2024

Cost and Performance Estimates for State-of-the-Art and Advanced 1×1 H-Class Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants

As an extension of NETL's Fossil Energy Baseline for Electricity Generating Units Volume 1: Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity (FEB Rev 4a, this study develops cost and performance estimates for analogous NGCC cases using a state-of-the-art 2023 vintage H-Class CT in a 1×1 configuration, where a single combustion turbine and heat recovery steam generator are coupled to a single steam turbine on a common shaft. These 1×1 H-Class cases are used to develop cost and performance estimates of X-Class 1×1 NGCC cases with advanced performance characteristics, analogous to NETL’s cost and performance projections report.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) Power Plants with Carbon Capture and Exhaust Gas Recycle (EGR)

The purpose of this study is to determine the cost and performance of natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants using state-of-the-art gas turbines with post combustion carbon capture and recycle streams designed to increase the CO 2 concentration in the inlet to the capture system. Increasing the inlet CO 2 concentration by exhaust gas recycle (EGR) is expected to improve the efficiency of the capture system and reduce its costs. Primary results indicate that adding EGR to NGCC plants with CO 2 capture results in minimal improvement to the cost of electricity. The addition of 50 percent EGR in NGCC plants with CO 2 capture reduces the LCOE by 2 percent over the LCOE of the same design without EGR as reference. Including the EGR ductwork and cooler in a greenfield plant design could still be prudent since there is some cost advantage to EGR and it would allow more flexibility for taking advantage of future improvements in the technology.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Retrofitting NGCC and PC Power Plants with Carbon Capture Technology

This is a poster that was presented at the 2023 Carbon Management Research Project Review Meeting. The poster highlights primary takeaways from two reports that were recently released by NETL on retrofitting natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) and pulverized coal (PC) power plants with solvent-based carbon capture technology. The poster highlights the performance and cost of retrofitting these plants at 90 and 95% carbon capture, including consideration of cases that attempt to makeup for steam turbine derates caused by extracting steam for use in the capture process. Additionally, the poster highlights NETL's recently released carbon capture retrofit databases (CCRD) for both NGCC and PC plants. The CCRDs are public-facing tools that allow the end-user to approximate the incremental cost of CO2 capture for a user defined plant with retrofitted capture technology.

Hackett, Gregory↗
DOE OSTI2023

Methodology for Estimating Performance and Cost of Natural Gas Combined Cycle Plants with Carbon Capture

This document describes a methodology that allows developers and evaluators to assess the status of developmental, natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) separation technologies with respect to NETL performance and cost metrics. Developmental CO 2 separation technologies that might apply for NGCC post-combustion power generation can be placed into several categories, including, but not limited to membranes, solvents, sorbents, adsorbents, and phase-change technologies. The intent of this product is to provide a consistent methodology for high-level comparison of in-development technology to a standardized baseline.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Quality Guidelines for Energy System Studies: Performing a Techno-Economic Analysis for Carbon Conversion Technologies (Final Report)

This document provides DOE-FECM specific guidance for conducting techno-economic analysis (TEA) on carbon conversion technologies using NETL's established TEA methodology. The intent is to provide guidance to develop a consistent methodology for evaluating carbon conversion technologies within the DOE-FECM portfolio. The document provides guidance on the analysis methodology, evaluation metrics including performance, cost, emissions, and market considerations, and ample references to guide the end user in the development of consistent TEA of carbon conversion technologies.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2023

Eliminating the Derate of Carbon Capture Retrofits (Rev. 2)

This study presents updated cost and performance information on retrofitting pulverized coal (PC) power plants with post-combustion carbon capture based on an advanced solvent process, based on NETL's Fossil Energy Baseline, Revision 4A. Cases considered include those using a fully integrated capture system, a case that provides capture system steam via a natural gas boiler, and a case that provides combined heat and power via a natural gas simple cycle system. Comparison cases include both new build and retrofit analysis at 90% and 95% carbon capture.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Analysis of Carbon Capture Retrofits for Cement Plants

The objective of this study is to provide an estimate of the cost to capture CO 2 in retrofit applications at cement plants. The cement plant configurations considered in this study include natural gas and solid fuel (coal and coke) cases, and both wet- and dry kiln-fed plant designs, however the base cement plants in this study were not evaluated other than characterization of their kiln off-gas stream and high-level quantification of heat integration potential at the existing plant. In each case, the base cement plant produces 1.5 M tonnes per year of finished cement, assuming 91.4 percent clinker content. This analysis includes a 10 percent retrofit cost increase for process integration and low grade heat recovery, when compared to the analogous non-heat integration case. Heat integration is considered as a potential offset to capture system heating demands (i.e., as a percentage reduction). Recovery and reuse of excess heat from the base cement plant can provide economic benefits—primarily by reducing the need to purchase supplemental natural gas for CO 2 solvent regeneration—but any process improvement must be great enough to overcome the cost increases (i.e., capital and O&M) necessary to realize those benefits. With heat integration potential of 10 percent and 30 percent, that benefit wasn’t significant enough to offset the increase in capital and operating costs, and a cost of capture increase was observed based on the assumptions in this report. Benefits of heat integration potential may be realized when natural gas prices are higher, as demonstrated in the sensitivity to natural gas price where crossover points exist between heat integration cases and their respective non-heat integration cases. Four of the base cases were further evaluated to explore the cost implications of deeper levels of gas pre-treatment to remove oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and oxides of sulfur (SOx) from the kiln off-gas stream prior to CO 2 capture, purification, and compression. The results of these additional case analyses showed a 7.4–18.8 percent increase in cost of capture over the respective base case (i.e., analogous cases without SOx/NOx removal).

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2023

Cost of Capturing CO 2 from Industrial Sources

The objective of this study is to provide an estimate of the cost to capture carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from select industrial processes (ammonia, ethylene oxide, ethanol, natural gas processing, coal-to-liquids, gas-to-liquids, refinery hydrogen, cement, iron/steel, and pulp/paper). Each of the ten processes were chosen for analysis due to either the high purity of the CO 2 emission source (99–100 mole percent CO 2 ) or the large quantity of CO 2 potentially available. For each industrial process considered, available plant information, such as existing average plant size, projected new development plant size, or existing plant operations data was used to develop a reference plant for this study.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Pulverized Coal CO2 Capture Retrofit Database

This tool provides high-level analysis on the incremental costs for retrofitting pulverized coal plants with carbon dioxide capture and/or compression systems. Options are available to include costs of other technological improvements that would be required to comply with various environmental regulations when installing carbon capture technology. This model is based on the NETL report "Eliminating the Derate of Carbon Capture Retrofits." (2023). For the Excel spreadsheet tools associated with this report, please go to https://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analysis/details?id=e7e822ff-18ac-4bc6-a052-0be3521b8789

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2023

Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 3: Low Rank Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity

This report presents an independent assessment of the cost and performance of select fossil energy power systems—pulverized coal (PC), circulating fluidized bed (CFB), and natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) plants—using a systematic, transparent technical and economic approach. This is Volume 3 of a five-volume series, which comprise the following reports: Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity; Volume 2: Coal to Synthetic Natural Gas and Ammonia (Various Coal Ranks); Volume 3: Low Rank Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity; Volume 4: Bituminous Coal to Liquid Fuels; and Volume 5: Natural Gas Electricity Generating Units for Flexible Operation. The cost and performance of fossil fuel-based generation technologies represented in this report (and the series at large) are important inputs to assessments and determinations of technology combinations to be utilized to meet the projected demands of future power markets. In addition to informing technology comparisons, the reference plant configurations found in this report provide perspective for regulators and policy makers. From a research and development perspective, this report is used to assess goals and metrics and to provide a consistent basis for comparing developing technologies.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Natural Gas Combined Cycle Carbon Capture Retrofit Database

This tool provides high-level analysis on the incremental costs for retrofitting natural gas combined cycle plants with carbon dioxide capture and/or compression systems. Options are available to include costs of other technological improvements that would be required to comply with various environmental regulations when installing carbon capture technology. This model is based on the NETL report "Cost and Performance of Retrofitting NGCC Units for Carbon Capture" (2023).

03 NATURAL GAS↗
DOE OSTI2023

NETL's Cost of Capturing CO2 from Industrial Sources and Industrial Carbon Capture Retrofit Database

This presentation was given on behalf of NETL's Strategic Systems Analysis and Engineering Directorate, Energy Process Analysis Team at a United States Energy Association webinar on January 24, 2023. The presentation summarizes techno economic analysis results of nine industrial CO2 capture cases, and also gave an overview and brief demonstration of the industrial sources Carbon Capture Retrofit Database, which is a publicly available tool that estimates capture costs for a subset of the industrial sources appearing in the companion systems analysis report.

Hughes, Sydney↗