Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Klebesadel, R. W.

Publications and source records attributed to Klebesadel, R. W..

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1984

Time history, energy spectrum, and localization of an unusual gamma-ray burst

A gamma-ray burst lasting about 48 ms was observed on June 13, 1979 by four instruments in the interplanetary network. The event is unusual not only by virture of its extremely short duration, but also by the presence of rise and fall times at the 2 ms level in the time history, and because the energy spectrum is hard, extending to 2 MeV. The 0.7 sq arcmin error box contains no optical counterpart on the POSS plate (limiting magnitude, about 21). The spectral characteristics measured by experiments in the interplanetary network are substantially different from those previously reported for this burst.

Barat, C.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Log N-log S in inconclusive

The log N-log S data acquired by the Pioneer Venus Orbiter Gamma Burst Detector (PVO) are presented and compared to similar data from the Soviet KONUS experiment. Although the PVO data are consistent with and suggestive of a -3/2 power law distribution, the results are not adequate at this state of observations to differentiate between a -3/2 and a -1 power law slope.

Klebesadel, R. W.↗
NASA NTRS1983

N49: The site of a gamma-ray burst - Preliminary results from X-ray observations

The error box of the unusual gamma-ray burst of Mar. 5, 1979 falls completely inside the optical and radio image of the supernova remnant N49 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. This region was observed twice in X-rays with the High-Resolution Imager of the Einstein Observatory, six weeks and nearly two years after the gamma-ray burst. A comparison between the two observations is shown.

Pizzichini, G.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Persistent X-ray emission from a gamma-ray burst source

A quiescent X-ray source detected with the Einstein X-ray Observatory in a location consistent with that of an intense gamma ray burst is shown to be also consistent with the location of the 1928 optical transient, the likely optical counterpart of the gamma ray burst source GBS0117-29. The system appears to be underluminous in X-rays by a factor of 10; possible reasons for this are discussed. The observed X-ray flux would require an accretion rate of about 10 to the -14th (d/1 kpc/)-squared solar masses per year, which is probably too low to be consistent with published nuclear flash models for gamma bursts, unless the distance is substantially greater than about 1 kpc or the burst recurrence time is greater than about 50 yrs, or the accretion rate is highly variable. Such a long recurrence time appears to be inconsistent with the detection of the optical burst.

Grindlay, J. E.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Comments on the gamma-ray burst catalog of Mazets et al. /1981a/

A correlation has been discovered between the Venera spacecraft locations and the gamma-ray burst positions reported in the KONUS catalog (Mazets et al., 1981a). The reason for the correlation is not clear, but it could be due to spatial selection effects and/or large localization errors for weak or soft bursts. Whatever the cause, it seems likely that this systematic bias might significantly affect catalog results pertaining to gamma burst locations, intensity distributions, and spectra. For example, it can explain why the KONUS galactic latitude distribution is peaked significantly south of the galactic equator. Apparent discrepanices between the KONUS and Los Alamos gamma burst data bases are noted.

Laros, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Gamma-ray sources as Comptonized X-ray sources

The possible contribution of Compton scattering to the formation of gamma-ray burst spectra is analyzed. Monte Carlo calculations are used to study the spectral distribution emerging from a plasma at temperatures typical of gamma-ray burst spectra (above 100 keV) with an underlying source of photons reprocessed by inverse Compton scattering surrounding a point source of blackbody radiation. Comparison of the computations with the observed spectrum of the burst GB781104 results in a best fit with a blackbody X-ray source at 2.4 keV, plasma temperature of about 150 eV and plasma column density of 4 x 10 to the 24th electrons/sq cm. The Comptonization model is also shown to be capable of accounting for the two-component spectra observed for bursts GB790329 and GB790524, and the moving low-energy spectral cut-off in the burst of November 18, 1978.

Fenimore, E. E.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Spatial structure of greater than 100 keV X-ray sources in solar flares

Recent ISEE 3 and Pioneer Venus Orbiter observations relevant to the altitude structure of the hard X-ray source down to 3000 km or less above the photosphere are reported. About 90 percent of the impulsive X-ray emission and about 70 percent of the gradual emission originates at altitudes 2500 km or less above the photosphere. In the 100-500 keV range, this altitude dependence is essentially independent of photon energy. Brightness of the impulsive X-ray source decreases rapidly with increase in altitude. As far as models of the impulsive phase are concerned, the thermal model with adiabatic compression and expansion of a magnetically confined plasma and the thin target model are not consistent with these observations. The thick target model and the dissipative thermal model are consistent with the observed low altitude of the hard X-ray source.

Kane, S. R.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Observation of two gamma-ray bursts by Vela X-ray detectors

Bursts of X-rays coincident in time with two gamma-ray burst events were observed by the 3-12 keV collimated X-ray detectors on the Vela spacecraft. Both of these observations show recurrence on a time scale of hundreds of seconds. For one of these events (GB 720514) the X-ray detection gives an improved position as well as information on the spectrum late in the outburst. The other event (GB 740723) is of special interest because the source, not previously located, is consistent in direction with the binary pulsar SMC X-1 in the Small Magellanic Cloud; this is the first moderately small error box for a gamma-ray burst to contain a strong X-ray source.

Terrell, J.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Einstein observations of the 1978 November 19 gamma ray burst source field

It is pointed out that several years after the discovery of cosmic gamma ray bursts (GRB) their sources have not yet been identified, although searches have been conducted in optical, X-ray, and radio wavelengths. The three smallest error boxes are now related to the events of Mar. 5, 1979, Apr. 6, 1979, and Nov. 19, 1978. X-ray observations, with the Imaging Proportional Counter (IPC) of the Einstein Observatory, were made for all three locations. A description is presented of the results of the 8200 second IPC observation of the Nov. 19, 1978 GRB, made on July 1 and 2, 1980. Three sources were detected. However, two of them were outside the GRB error box. The third source is located well inside the burst error box.

Pizzichini, G.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Gamma-ray burst systematics

A systematic classification of gamma-ray bursts is considered on the basis of temporal and spectral burst features. Three categories of bursts are proposed, and the category of classical (or normal) bursts is subdivided into three classes: very brief, doublet/quasi-periodic, and long irregular. Apparent correlations are discussed between emission lines and the doublet/quasi-periodic class and between absorption lines and the long irregular class.

Klebesadel, R. W.↗
NASA NTRS1982

On the interpretation of gamma-ray burst continua and possible cyclotron absorption lines

It is pointed out that most gamma-ray bursts have spectra that are fit by an optically thin thermal bremsstrahlung shape. The small emitting volume implied by the observation of spectral features identified as cyclotron absorption lines from a 10 to the 12th Gauss field is shown to prevent thermal bremsstrahlung from providing sufficient luminosities to account for the observed fluxes unless the optical depth to Compton scattering is large. It is also demonstrated that complicated detector response functions can introduce artifacts that mimic absorption features below 60 keV unless the absolute gain of the detector is established and correctly applied in analysis. Comparing the continuum as observed by the Berkeley/Los Alamos ISEE-3 gamma-ray detector with the continuum observed by the Konus (Mazets et al. 1981) experiments, a lack of agreement is found, suggesting that the gain of one of these experiments may be incorrect.

Fenimore, E. E.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Precise source location of the anomalous 1979 March 5 gamma ray transient

Refinements in the source direction analysis of the observations of the unusual gamma ray transient are presented. The final results from the interplanetary gamma ray burst network produce a 0.1 arc sq. min. error box. It is nested inside the initially determined 2 arc sq min. source region. This smaller source location is within both the optical and X-ray contours of N49 although not positioned at either contour center.

Cline, T. L.↗
NASA NTRS1981

High-precision source location of the 1978 November 19 gamma-ray burst

The celestial source location of the November 19, 1978, intense gamma ray burst has been determined from data obtained with the interplanetary gamma-ray sensor network by means of long-baseline wave front timing instruments. Each of the instruments was designed for studying events with observable spectra of approximately greater than 100 keV, and each provides accurate event profile timing in the several millisecond range. The data analysis includes the following: the triangulated region is centered at (gamma, delta) 1950 = (1h16m32s, -28 deg 53 arcmin), at -84 deg galactic latitude, where the star density is very low and the obscuration negligible. The gamma-ray burst source region, consistent with that of a highly polarized radio source described by Hjellming and Ewald (1981), may assist in the source modeling and may facilitate the understanding of the source process. A marginally identifiable X-ray source was also found by an Einstein Observatory investigation. It is concluded that the burst contains redshifted positron annihilation and nuclear first-excited iron lines, which is consistent with a neutron star origin.

Cline, T. L.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Location of the 1979 April 6 gamma-ray burst

A gamma-ray burst was recorded on 1979 April 6 at 1140 UT by instruments on the Pioneer Venus Orbiter (PVO), Venera 11 (V11), Venera 12 (V12), Prognoz 7 (P7), and International Sun-Earth Explorer-3 (ISEE-3) spacecraft. The event consisted of a single spike of 0.2 s duration and had a spectral feature near 400 keV, thus resembling the 1979 March 5 event in two respects. However, important differences in rise time and spectral hardness make it impossible to conclude positively that the two events shared the same mechanism or had comparable energetics. Constraints placed by these findings on the energetics and types of objects that could be responsible for the April 6 and possibly the March 5 bursts are discussed.

Laros, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Spectral evolution of the 5 March 1979 gamma burst

The spectral development of the intense gamma-ray burst observed on March 5, 1979 by nine spacecraft spaced on an interplanetary scale is discussed. As observed by the Pioneer Venus Orbiter detector, the hardness ratio of the burst, defined as the ratio between counts in the 100-1000 keV channels to those in the 50-100 keV channel, decreases during the very fast rise and subsequent 75 msec of the burst, consistent with a decrease in black-body temperature from 30 to 26 keV, and then increases during the shoulder on the gamma-ray burst light curve. Following the burst, the source was observed to exhibit many of the characteristics of a hard X-ray pulsar with a period of 8.0 sec and a hardness ratio varying in phase with the intensity. The observed characteristics of the pulsations are interpreted in terms of hot spots at the magnetic poles of a rotating neutron star, although it is shown that the simple cooling of residual hot spots does not completely explain the pulsations. Alternative explanations for the pulsation include accretion or an effect of beam geometry.

Fenimore, E. E.↗