Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Kevin E Jacobson

Publications and source records attributed to Kevin E Jacobson.

28 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flutter-Constrained Optimization with the Linearized Frequency-Domain Approach

Due to the high computational cost associated with unsteady aeroelastic analysis, state-of-the-art aeroelastic optimizations based on computational fluid dynamics typically ignore critical constraints like flutter and aeroelastic gust response. The linearized frequency-domain method offers an approach for adding high-fidelity flutter constraints to multidisciplinary optimizations at relatively low cost compared to other unsteady computational fluid dynamics methods. In recent work, sensitivities have been implemented for the linearized frequency-domain method in FUN3D. In this work, the linearized frequency-domain method and associated sensitivities are applied to gradient-based aeroelastic optimization with flutter constraints based on computational fluid dynamics. An overview of the flutter constraint formulation and implementation is provided, and then two optimization problems are presented. The first optimization increases the flutter speed of a pitch and plunge airfoil at transonic conditions using the minimal amount of geometric changes. The second optimization minimizes the mass of the AGARD 445.6 wing subject to a flutter constraint.

Aeroelasticity↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Gradient-Enhanced Reliability Analysis of Transonic Aeroelastic Flutter

Reliability computation for transonic aeroelastic systems is a challenging task, given the complex physical mechanisms involved, and broader challenges associated with computing small probabilities of failure/flutter. This paper demonstrates the use of four different reliability estimation tools, with a particular focus on tools that can utilize gradient information: the derivative of flutter boundaries with respect to random parametric inputs. Results are shown for two test cases: the AGARD 445.6 case and the Common Research Model, and the strength and weaknesses of each UQ tool are compared in terms of cost and accuracy. Two of the UQ tools used here require gradients as part of a search process, but the other two are sample-based, and are able to leverage the existence of gradients for improved performance.

Bret K Stanford↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Ongoing Aeroelastic Prediction and Validation Activities at NASA Langley Research Center

Current and future transonic aircraft concepts of interest to NASA may be susceptible to complex aeroelastic failure mechanisms that are difficult for computational tools to adequately predict. As such, a direct accounting of transonic flutter behavior has not historically been conducted at early design stages, where problems are less expensive to address. This paper summarizes efforts within NASA Langley's Aeroelasticity Branch to improve this situation, through advancements in computational prediction and optimization of transonic flutter behavior, in addition to planned wind tunnel tests aimed at providing a greater wealth of experimental data to validate predictions.

Bret K Stanford↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Progress on Flutter Analysis of the X-56A for the Third Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop

An aeroelastic analysis is presented for the X-56A test case of the upcoming third aeroelastic prediction workshop. Results using the FUN3D linearized frequency-domain solver are shown for four different structural models corresponding to increasing fuel loads. The present study is blind since only redacted and normalized flight test data have been published. However, trends in body-freedom flutter mode frequencies and damping with respect to fuel load are seen to agree well with previously published redacted flight test data.

Steven J Massey↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transonic Flutter Dips of the AGARD 445.6 Wing

The AGARD 445.6 configuration is the most popular validation test case for transonic flutter predictions, but the actual extent of truly nonlinear transonic flow for this case is unclear, due to the sparsity of the experimental data, and the thin profile of the wing. This work utilizes a combination of mesh adaptation and the linearized frequency-domain method to obtain high-quality viscous and inviscid flutter predictions; these solutions show a double flutter dip through the transonic Mach range driven by complex shock growth across the wing. A single experimental flutter point lies in this flutter dip area, which is not enough to assess the accuracy of these transonic flutter predictions. Modeling the boundary layer of the wind tunnel wall (as opposed to the commonly-assumed symmetry wall assumption) appears to have a large impact on the predicted flutter boundary, but true mesh convergence of this scenario is a challenge.

Bret K Stanford↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flutter Prediction Report in Support of the High Angle Working Group at the Third Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop

This paper presents a summary of the computational flutter results associated with the AIAA third Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop (AePW-3) High Angle Working Group (HAWG). The computational results are compared against the experimental data collected during the Pitch and Plunge Apparatus (PAPA) Benchmark Supercritical Wing (BSCW) test campaign conducted in the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) at NASA Langley Research Center thirty years ago. During that test several flutter points were identified at transonic conditions. One of these points, specifically near Mach 0.8 and 5° angle of attack, became a focal point of the computational challenge with in HAWG. Various fidelity time-domain, Reduced Order Model (ROM) and Linearized Frequency Domain (LFD) methods were used by seven participating teams. While there are encouraging trends in the computational results, the range of the predicted flutter dynamic pressure is still quite large due to the stall flutter mechanism. A description of each participating team’s software and methods is included.

Pawel Chwalowski↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multifidelity Optimization with Transonic Flutter Constraints

This work considers static and dynamic aeroelastic optimization of a cantilevered platewing in transonic flow. Low- and high-fidelity aeroelastic predictions are fed into a standard trust region model management scheme in order to efficiently solve this expensive optimization problem with multifidelity methods. Differences in fidelity are entirely driven by different aerodynamic solvers: linear panel methods for the low-fidelity method, and inviscid CFD-based solvers for the high-fidelity response. The optimization problem utilizes shape, sizing, and trim variables to satisfy stress, trim, and flutter constraints, and is solved across a range of subsonic and transonic Mach numbers. The multifidelity method is able to provide a speed-up for all cases considered here, despite sizable inaccuracies in the low-fidelity response for transonic flows.

Bret K Stanford↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Investigations of an Aeroelastic Optimization Benchmark Problem with MPhys and FUN3D

High-fidelity aeroelastic optimization capabilities are becoming more common in recent years. In this field, researchers typically present results on the design problems of greatest interest to them. The lack of consistency with respect to baseline configurations, design variables, objectives and constraints, etc., makes it difficult to compare approaches and creates an obstacle for the community to work together to advance the state of the art. The High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Optimization Benchmark Working Group has been established to create and study a series of benchmark aeroelastic optimization problems that the community can utilize to compare methods on the same optimization problem. This paper presents optimization results from NASA Langley Research Center for the first benchmark case of this series with analysis based on MPhys, a multiphysics library for OpenMDAO, and FUN3D, an unstructured computational fluid dynamics suite of tools. For the optimization case presented, it is demonstrated that a progression of increasing aerodynamic model fidelity reduces the wall time required to complete the optimization.

Aeroelasticity↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aerothermodynamic Analysis of a Flexible Thermal Protection System under Reentry Loads

The Carryall Block 1 reentry vehicle being developed by Outpost Space utilizes a strut supported semirigid deployable heatshield. This consists of a flexible thermal protection system, a heat-resistant fabric stack, stretched over actuated spars. The advantages of a deployable heatshield include reduced heat loading and earlier deceleration in the trajectory. However, the nature of the flexible thermal protection system necessitates considering the loaded shape of the heat shield. The flexible thermal protection system will deflect under reentry loads leading to areas of higher heating rates as well as a reduced axial coefficient as compared to the nominal shape. The Carryall Block 1 is analyzed using NASA’s FUN3D and DPLR CFD solvers with a deflected shape based on the catenary equations. The aerodynamic results are found to be within a percent for both solvers and both structured and unstructured mesh types. Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) analysis is currently a work in progress, using file I/O to communicate between FUN3D and LS-DYNA, a commercial nonlinear structural solver. Challenges in deforming the geometry, mesh, and initial results are presented here.

thermal protection system↗