Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Kasey Ackerman

Publications and source records attributed to Kasey Ackerman.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2020

Controller Design for Propeller Phase Synchronization with Aeroacoustic Performance Metrics

Active noise reduction using phase control takes advantage of the propellers used in a distributed electric air vehicle by treating each propeller as an independent acoustic source. These acoustic sources can destructively interfere if the propellers are synchronized. With this method, the radiated sound power around the vehicle can be reduced. The purpose of this paper is to design a controller that regulates propeller positions to reduce the radiated sound power through destructive interference and to demonstrate the performance of the controller through acoustic testing. There are two control requirements for reducing the sound pressure level considered in this paper. The first is accurately regulating the difference between the propeller azimuthal blade positions (phase) relative to their neighbors. By changing the phase at the source, we can control the phase of the sound wave at an arrival position to create destructive interference. The second consideration is maintaining high coherence between the two propeller sources. To achieve significant attenuation, the controller needs to regulate phase error and suppress sources of incoherence. Performance is demonstrated through sound recordings performed in the NASA Langley Structural Acoustic Loads and Transmission (SALT) anechoic chamber. We show that the controller is capable of reducing sound pressure level at a given observer location by 17 dB at the blade passage frequency and that this method can reduce the radiated sound power by 6 dB at the blade passage frequency.

Andrew Patterson↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Trajectory Generation for Distributed Electric Propulsion Vehicles with Propeller Synchronization

In this paper, we propose a method for generating dynamically feasible trajectories for an acoustically aware vehicle with propeller phase control. The trajectory generation procedure allows both propeller phase control and navigation objectives to be considered simultaneously. The presented method is demonstrated where the mission objectives are given as a desired position and phase trajectory. From these trajectories, the full desired state of the vehicle is calculated. Furthermore, the control inputs that realize the desired mission objectives are computed. The acoustic performance for the given trajectory is estimated in terms of sound pressure level as a function of tracking performance. The method is demonstrated in simulation, where the vehicle must navigate through an urban environment with both spatial and acoustic constraints. In the presented scenario, the vehicle must follow a given flight path, and can only reduce sound pressure level by changing the propeller phase targets.

Acoustically-aware vehicle↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An L1 Adaptive Control Augmentation for a Lift Plus-Cruise Vehicle

This paper presents anL1adaptive control augmentation for a Lift-Plus-Cruise (L+C)vehicle. This class of vehicles operates in three flight modes with different dynamic behavior: vertical, transition, and forward flight. A robust uniform controller is used as a baseline to stabilize the system throughout these flight modes. The uniform controller is a linear control law designed around trim conditions of the aircraft and includes control allocation to achieve the desired forces and moments on the vehicle. TheL1control augmentation is designed for each of these trim conditions to compensate for the nonlinear time- and state-dependent uncertainties in the vehicle dynamics. The augmented control output is then added to the desired force and moment commands on the vehicle. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of control augmentation for reducing the effects of unmodeled dynamics, reduced actuator effectiveness, and time-dependent disturbances. Effectiveness is demonstrated through tracking error metrics.

Andrew Patterson↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Adaptive Optimization for System Performance and Combined Bernstein Polynomial, Optimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance, Differential Dynamic Programming for Trajectory Replanning and Collision Avoidance for UAM Vehicles

The emerging urban air mobility (UAM) sector in aerospace is driving development of unconventional multi-modal vehicle configurations and autonomous flight. The combination of multi-modal vehicle dynamics, complex environment, requirements to deal with flight contingencies in an efficient and safe manner, as well as necessity for precise trajectory following and performance, are the driving influence behind adaptive optimization for system performance. We are interested in trajectory optimization algorithm that would system parameter estimation and identifying the optimal switching time between modes of hybrid dynamical systems. This presentation discusses a parameterized optimal control trajectory optimization algorithm that is an extended and generalized version of Differential Dynamic Programming (DDP), titled Parameterized Differential Dynamic Programming (PDDP). DDP is an efficient trajectory optimization algorithm relying on second order approximations of a system’s dynamics and cost function and has recently been applied to optimize systems with time invariant parameters. Experiments are presented applying PDDP to solve model predictive control (MPC) and moving horizon estimation (MHE) tasks simultaneously. In particular, PDDP is used to determine the optimal transition point between flight regimes of a complex urban air mobility (UAM) class vehicle exhibiting multiple phases of flight and to identify and compensate for actuation faults.

optimization↗