Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Joslin, Chase

Publications and source records attributed to Joslin, Chase.

Process–Property–Performance Mapping of Additively Manufactured 316H Stainless Steel Components

The Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Program is focused on accelerating the development of advanced materials and components fabricated via additive manufacturing, and is using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) of 316H stainless steel as an initial case study. In the previous fiscal year, miniature high-throughput specimens were printed on multiple LPBF systems to provide initial processing windows to minimize porosity and limit epitaxial grain growth during prints. This fiscal year, scaled builds were completed on three different LPBF systems at ORNL: a GE Concept Laser M2, a Renishaw AM400, and an EOS M290. Builds on the Concept Laser were conducted on multiple powder lots and processing parameter ranges to provide microstructure effects on time-independent and time-dependent mechanical properties. Builds on the Renishaw were produced using Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)-optimized printing parameters and Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)-optimized printing parameters to compare outcomes of parallel process optimization efforts at different national laboratories on the same LPBF system. Similarly, the build completed on the EOS M290 replicated the processing parameters of builds completed at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Optical microscopy and electron backscatter diffraction characterization was completed on all builds. In addition to the general round robin characterization, this work-package generated time-independent data, including tensile and fracture toughness test data on scaled Concept Laser builds as a function of processing parameters and post-build heat treatment. This analysis is complimentary to work in parallel work packages aiming to establish heat treatment and processing effects on time-dependent properties. It was found that although the stress-relief heat treatment provides the highest strength at lower-temperatures, tensile strength begins to converge at higher temperatures regardless of heat treatment condition. In addition, the more rigorous solution annealing and hot-isostatic pressing post-build heat treatments result in higher fracture toughness than the stress-relieved condition. The root-causes of the lower fracture toughness of the stress-relieved LPBF 316H material was informed via a stress-relief optimization study on a scaled concept laser print, where it was found that although dislocation recovery was largely complete after only a couple hours at 650°C, the extended hold of the current 24h heat treatment employed on scaled builds likely caused increased carbide volume fractions along the LPBF 316H grain boundaries, thereby deteriorating crack propagation resistance. This trend was seen to become more deleterious with additional increases of stress-relief temperature to 750°C or 850°C. These results have helped inform a new optimal stress-relief annealing condition for LPBF 316H for future campaign testing (650°C for 2h).

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Process–Property–Performance Mapping of Additively Manufactured 316H Stainless Steel Components

The Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Program is focused on accelerating the development of advanced materials and components fabricated via additive manufacturing, and is using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) of 316H stainless steel as an initial case study. In the previous fiscal year, miniature high-throughput specimens were printed on multiple LPBF systems to provide initial processing windows to minimize porosity and limit epitaxial grain growth during prints. This fiscal year, scaled builds were completed on three different LPBF systems at ORNL: a GE Concept Laser M2, a Renishaw AM400, and an EOS M290. Builds on the Concept Laser were conducted on multiple powder lots and processing parameter ranges to provide microstructure effects on time-independent and time-dependent mechanical properties. Builds on the Renishaw were produced using Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)-optimized printing parameters and Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)-optimized printing parameters to compare outcomes of parallel process optimization efforts at different national laboratories on the same LPBF system. Similarly, the build completed on the EOS M290 replicated the processing parameters of builds completed at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Optical microscopy and electron backscatter diffraction characterization was completed on all builds. In addition to the general round robin characterization, this work-package generated time-independent data, including tensile and fracture toughness test data on scaled Concept Laser builds as a function of processing parameters and post-build heat treatment. This analysis is complimentary to work in parallel work packages aiming to establish heat treatment and processing effects on time-dependent properties. It was found that although the stress-relief heat treatment provides the highest strength at lower-temperatures, tensile strength begins to converge at higher temperatures regardless of heat treatment condition. In addition, the more rigorous solution annealing and hot-isostatic pressing post-build heat treatments result in higher fracture toughness than the stress-relieved condition. The root-causes of the lower fracture toughness of the stress-relieved LPBF 316H material was informed via a stress-relief optimization study on a scaled concept laser print, where it was found that although dislocation recovery was largely complete after only a couple hours at 650°C, the extended hold of the current 24h heat treatment employed on scaled builds likely caused increased carbide volume fractions along the LPBF 316H grain boundaries, thereby deteriorating crack propagation resistance. This trend was seen to become more deleterious with additional increases of stress-relief temperature to 750°C or 850°C. These results have helped inform a new optimal stress-relief annealing condition for LPBF 316H for future campaign testing (650°C for 2h).

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Preliminary Assessment of Additively Manufactured Cooling Channel Performance for Helium-Cooled Blanket Concepts

Sufficient cooling of the blanket first wall remains a critical challenge for the design and deployment of fusion power plants. Helium has been targeted as a potential blanket coolant due to its inertness and low neutron interactivity, among other advantages. However, the low thermal mass of helium creates a need for heat transfer enhancements in coolant channels to provide adequate cooling to the blanket’s first wall. Toward this end, a series of ribbed flow channels of various rib cross sections and configurations has been produced via additive manufacturing (AM) to study the efficacy of AM for first wall heat transfer enhancement and the optimization of heat transfer geometries. Helium cooling performance is studied in AM test articles at 4 MPa operating pressure, Reynolds numbers up to 197 000, and outer surface heat fluxes up to 42 kW/m 2 in the recently commissioned helium flow loop experiment (HFLE). Preliminary results of this study are presented herein. Heat transfer performance of nominally smooth (i.e., featureless) AM channels is quantified via measured Nusselt numbers and friction factors and compared to off-the-shelf smooth pipe experiments. Results are compared to existing correlations and used to discuss the effects of the AM processes on thermal-hydraulic performance. It is seen that the inherent roughness of the AM channels leads to an increase in both heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop when compared to the conventional pipe. In conclusion, recommendations are made for future studies based on these findings and additional considerations for the deployment of AM blanket cooling components.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Fabrication of a Liner Assembly for the MARVEL Microreactor

A liner assembly for an intermediate heat exchanger within the MARVEL microreactor at Idaho National Laboratory has been fabricated using laser-based additive manufacturing. The liner design includes challenging features such as long thin walls, overhangs, and tight geometric tolerances. Two versions of the liner assembly, one full length and the other shortened, were printed from several materials (316L SS, Inconel 625, and Inconel 718) using four powder-based laser printers (AddUp BeAM Modulo 400 DED, EOS 290M LPBF, GE Concept M2, and GE Concept Xline 2000R LPBF) located at the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility of Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Dimensional accuracy, print time, and powder utilization have been evaluated to help assess the feasibility of these AM approaches to liner fabrication. Based on this assessment, a potentially cost-effective pathway for fabrication has been proposed.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A Data-Driven Framework for Direct Local Tensile Property Prediction of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Parts

This article proposes a generalizable, data-driven framework for qualifying laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured parts using part-specific in situ data, including powder bed imaging, machine health sensors, and laser scan paths. To achieve part qualification without relying solely on statistical processes or feedstock control, a sequence of machine learning models was trained on 6299 tensile specimens to locally predict the tensile properties of stainless-steel parts based on fused multi-modal in situ sensor data and a priori information. A cyberphysical infrastructure enabled the robust spatial tracking of individual specimens, and computer vision techniques registered the ground truth tensile measurements to the in situ data. The co-registered 230 GB dataset used in this work has been publicly released and is available as a set of HDF5 files. The extensive training data requirements and wide range of size scales were addressed by combining deep learning, machine learning, and feature engineering algorithms in a relay. The trained models demonstrated a 61% error reduction in ultimate tensile strength predictions relative to estimates made without any in situ information. Lessons learned and potential improvements to the sensors and mechanical testing procedure are discussed.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Leveraging the digital thread for physics-based prediction of microstructure heterogeneity in additively manufactured parts

A major limitation of additive manufacturing (AM) processes is that local conditions of material deposition frequently lead to unintentional heterogeneities in microstructure and properties within a single component, despite nominally uniform process conditions. Up to now, there has been no way to a priori determine the distribution of these heterogeneities, requiring expensive trial-and-error approaches to fabrication, testing, and characterization. Here, a physics-based framework for creating a digital representation of the laser powder bed fusion (PBF) process is proposed to predict the variation in solidification behavior that leads to heterogeneous microstructures in an as-built part. By leveraging in situ process data stored in the part’s digital thread, the scan path and process parameters were input into a heat transfer model which predicted solidification data at the melt pool scale. A two-step unsupervised clustering algorithm was used to first cluster the local solidification conditions (12.5µm 3 voxels) and then to cluster the regional behavior on the scale of multiple scan passes and print layers (250µm 3 super-voxels). This process was used to identify regions with similar solidification characteristics for multiple locations in a Stainless Steel 316-L component. The corresponding as-built part was sectioned and characterized using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Quantitative analysis of the pole figures confirmed that the predicted regions of heterogeneity in the solidification conditions corresponded with differences in the observed microstructure. In conclusion, this work shows a viable path for estimating the microstructural heterogeneity for additively manufactured parts to either limit microstructural variation throughout a part or to enable functionality-based variation of the microstructure.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A Co-Registered In-Situ and Ex-Situ Dataset from a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process (Peregrine v2023-10)

This release contains a co-registered in-situ and ex-situ Peregrine dataset from a single Concept Laser M2 Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) stainless steel 316L build. These data were collected at the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) located at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The dataset includes layer-wise visible-light in-situ imaging data, the laser scan paths and parameters, in-situ temporal sensor data, X-Ray Computed Tomography (X-CT) scans, pycnometry and tensile test results, etched micrographs from selected locations, and the target part geometries. Additionally, anomaly detections produced by a modified Dynamic Segmentation Convolutional Neural Network (DSCNN) are provided.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A Co-Registered In-Situ and Ex-Situ Dataset from an Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process (Peregrine v2023-09)

This release contains a co-registered in-situ and ex-situ Peregrine dataset from a single Arcam Q10 Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion (EB-PBF) Inconel 738 build. These data were collected at the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) located at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The dataset includes layer-wise Near Infrared (NIR) in-situ imaging data, in-situ temporal sensor data, ex-situ X-Ray Computed Tomography (X-CT) scans, and the target part geometries. Additionally, anomaly detections produced by a trained Dynamic Segmentation Convolutional Neural Network (DSCNN) are provided.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A Co-Registered In-Situ and Ex-Situ Tensile Properties Dataset from a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process (Peregrine v2023-11)

This release contains a co-registered in-situ and ex-situ Peregrine dataset from five Concept Laser M2 Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) stainless steel 316L builds containing 6,299 SS-J3 individually tracked tensile coupons. These data were collected at the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) located at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The dataset includes layer-wise visible-light in-situ imaging data, the laser scan paths and parameters, in-situ temporal sensor data, room-temperature static tensile test results, and the target part geometries. Additionally, anomaly detections produced by a modified Dynamic Segmentation Convolutional Neural Network (DSCNN) are provided.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Data-Driven Optimization of the Processing Window for 316H Components Fabricated Using Laser Powder Bed Fusion

The Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Program is focused on accelerating the development and deployment of advanced materials and components fabricated via additive manufacturing with a specific focus on laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). As an initial case study, the program has selected 316H stainless steel (SS) as an initial material around which to develop a code case development strategy. This strategy involves two parallel approaches: (1) an equivalency approach whereby round-robin testing across multiple collaborating laboratories demonstrates repeatability in processing and direct comparisons with conventional wrought 316H material and (2) a revolutionary approach to code qualification combining in situ data collection and high-fidelity modeling to capture, predict, and bound the performance of LPBF 316HSS components. As part of this campaign, this work package has initiated an extensive process optimization campaign across three laboratories, each printing variations of LPBF 316HSS using three different LPBF units (Concept Laser, EOS, and Renishaw). In FY23, ORNL has focused on unique experimental designs spanning wide ranges in energy inputs and turning knobs such as scan speed, laser power, hatch spacing, layer thickness, spot size, scan rotation, and more. On the Concept Laser M2, 72 different combinations of processing variables were investigated with duplicate samples and different powder compositions. In total, 252 samples were printed with combined in situ sensing data. A parallel design of experiments was conducted on the Renishaw AM400 with an additional 390 printed specimens for analysis. All 642 miniature specimens, each with unique features included in each print to capture geometry-related heterogeneity, were subjected to high-throughput x-ray computed tomography (XCT) analysis to enable the downselection of specific processing parameters of interest. Then, using electrical discharge machining (EDM), miniature tensile specimens were extracted for mechanical testing and microscopy investigations. From the analysis performed in FY23, it was found that powder composition drastically affects the resulting microstructure and mechanical performance of 316SS. Specifically, changing from 316L to 316HSS powder results in a wide range of grain sizes with varying degrees of preferred grain orientation, which increases as a function of energy density. It was also found that due to stored heat in thin fin–type features, large microstructural differences can be seen within one part printed with one set of processing parameters. These variations in microstructure features, including grain size, the nanoscale dislocation structure, and grain texture, will all affect the irradiation performance and high-temperature mechanical performance of LPBF 316HSS parts. Two sets of concept laser processing parameters, spanning both refined and columnar grain structures, were scaled to print larger 316H builds for campaign testing (high-temperature creep and irradiation). In addition, at least two optimized processing parameter sets were identified for the Renishaw AM400 for round-robin testing in FY24 with Argonne National Laboratory. Future work includes printing samples using identical parameters identified by partner institutions, providing material for corrosion and high-temperature mechanical testing, and continuing evaluations of heterogeneity in larger printed parts.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Data-Driven Optimization of the Processing Window for 316H Components Fabricated Using Laser Powder Bed Fusion

The Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Program is focused on accelerating the development and deployment of advanced materials and components fabricated via additive manufacturing with a specific focus on laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). As an initial case study, the program has selected 316H stainless steel (SS) as an initial material around which to develop a code case development strategy. This strategy involves two parallel approaches: (1) an equivalency approach whereby round-robin testing across multiple collaborating laboratories demonstrates repeatability in processing and direct comparisons with conventional wrought 316H material and (2) a revolutionary approach to code qualification combining in situ data collection and high-fidelity modeling to capture, predict, and bound the performance of LPBF 316HSS components. As part of this campaign, this work package has initiated an extensive process optimization campaign across three laboratories, each printing variations of LPBF 316HSS using three different LPBF units (Concept Laser, EOS, and Renishaw). In FY23, ORNL has focused on unique experimental designs spanning wide ranges in energy inputs and turning knobs such as scan speed, laser power, hatch spacing, layer thickness, spot size, scan rotation, and more. On the Concept Laser M2, 72 different combinations of processing variables were investigated with duplicate samples and different powder compositions. In total, 252 samples were printed with combined in situ sensing data. A parallel design of experiments was conducted on the Renishaw AM400 with an additional 390 printed specimens for analysis. All 642 miniature specimens, each with unique features included in each print to capture geometry-related heterogeneity, were subjected to high-throughput x-ray computed tomography (XCT) analysis to enable the downselection of specific processing parameters of interest. Then, using electrical discharge machining (EDM), miniature tensile specimens were extracted for mechanical testing and microscopy investigations. From the analysis performed in FY23, it was found that powder composition drastically affects the resulting microstructure and mechanical performance of 316SS. Specifically, changing from 316L to 316HSS powder results in a wide range of grain sizes with varying degrees of preferred grain orientation, which increases as a function of energy density. It was also found that due to stored heat in thin fin–type features, large microstructural differences can be seen within one part printed with one set of processing parameters. These variations in microstructure features, including grain size, the nanoscale dislocation structure, and grain texture, will all affect the irradiation performance and high-temperature mechanical performance of LPBF 316HSS parts. Two sets of concept laser processing parameters, spanning both refined and columnar grain structures, were scaled to print larger 316H builds for campaign testing (high-temperature creep and irradiation). In addition, at least two optimized processing parameter sets were identified for the Renishaw AM400 for round-robin testing in FY24 with Argonne National Laboratory. Future work includes printing samples using identical parameters identified by partner institutions, providing material for corrosion and high-temperature mechanical testing, and continuing evaluations of heterogeneity in larger printed parts.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Preliminary Report on Compositional Specification for Printed 316SS

The Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Program is focused on accelerating the development and deployment of advanced materials and components fabricated via additive manufacturing (AM). A key challenge for the widespread adoption of AM is the variability in material properties, which can originate from powder feedstock, process parameters, geometry, and the machine. AM powder feedstock compositions are based on those developed for conventional manufacturing. However, the smaller melt pools combined with multiple melt cycles over the course of a build can have substantial effects on the local phase selection resulting from minor batch-to-batch feedstock variability. Therefore, this report focuses on coupling CALPHAD calculations with data mining and visualization to aid the development of compositional specifications for stainless steel 316, an important alloy for nuclear applications and suitable for AM. This work reports that δ-ferrite formation has a stronger dependence on the amount of nickel in the alloy despite nickel being an austenite stabilizer. These findings show the need for exercising a tighter control on the amount of nickel in the alloy compared with the amount of chromium, which is a ferrite stabilizer.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Report Outlining Computed Tomography Strategy and Microscopy Approach to Qualifying AM 316 Materials

This report is part of work package CR-22OR0406012, Automated, High-Throughput Materials Characterization Techniques , under the Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies program (AMMT). The project’s primary objective is to leverage our AI-based rapid and high-throughput automated characterization framework to qualify additively manufactured 316 materials comprehensively, focusing on optimizing the additive manufacturing process and evaluating the performance of 3D-printed stainless steel components. This report outlines our strategy for leveraging the automated characterization process for qualifying 316H materials.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗