Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

John N. Opiela

Publications and source records attributed to John N. Opiela.

Orbital Debris Mitigation and CubeSats

The 2019 update to the U. S. Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices (ODMSP) included CubeSats as a special class of space operations for the first time. This is the first governmental-level policy document that calls for CubeSats to follow quantitative recommendations for orbital debris mitigation. While CubeSats were never exempt from such recommendations, mission designers often “under assess” CubeSats due to their small size and historically low level of stored energy. Qualitative assessments of debris potential are less applicable as miniaturized energy systems (propulsive and electrical) become more available and as the “CubeSat” label is applied to larger payloads. Of particular interest to the long-term evolution of the debris environment is the likelihood of accidental explosion or collision; we must also consider the risk to the human population from reentering spacecraft. We discuss the on-orbit history of CubeSats and present guidance to assist in designing for future compliance with the new standard practices.

Chris L. Ostrom↗

X-Ray Imagery as the Record of All Data of Interest in Hypervelocity Impact Fragment Studies

Laboratory study of hypervelocity spacecraft fragmentation has traditionally involved the collection and analysis of fragments that were caught in deceleration material surrounding the impact. This process has typically involved the disintegration of the catchment material either through chemical dissolution, or through physical excavation to recover the fragments. Due to the scale of the three impact tests—the Satellite Orbital Debris Characterization Impact Test (SOCIT), the DebriSat satellite impact test, and the DebrisLV launch vehicle impact test—the latter two using more than 12 cubic meters of polyurethane foam to capture the fragments, hese projects have used x-ray imagery to precisely locate and thus, to more efficiently extract fragments in the soft-catch material. Three years into the DebriSat fragment extraction process, a side study was initiated to explore what additional information could be discerned from the x-rays, with significant results. This study was instrumental to a rapid replacement and retooling as the project was forced to replace the x-ray system around which the extraction process had been based. The revised process continues to map the debris for extraction. The project has, in parallel, systematically addressed the limits/tolerances of what x-rays can reveal about size, shape, density, mass, velocity, energy, and deformation/damage of the fragment during the deceleration in the catchment material while replicating the original extraction mapping function. All of these features have been optimized or have sufficient understanding to characterize the basic factors that will define a complete data set extracted solely from x-ray imagery. It is an ideal time to develop such a process, with extracted fragments providing “ground truth” against image-only data, and abundant available imagery of the same fragments under both the prior and replacement x-ray technologies, which have several fundamentally different characteristics. This paper addresses the types and quality of hypervelocity fragmentation data that can be and has been extracted from x-rays. It further addresses the question of whether and under what circumstances future hypervelocity experiments can use x-ray methods to largely—or to completely—avoid the extraction process in recording all appropriate results. Lastly, this paper addresses lessons learned and how future efforts can be further optimized.

John B. Bacon↗