Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Hyatt, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hyatt, A..

23 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Integrated current profile, normalized beta and NTM control in DIII-D

There is an increasing need for integrating individual plasma-control algorithms with the ultimate goal of simultaneously regulating more than one plasma property. Some of these integrated-control solutions should have the capability of arbitrating the authority of the individual plasma-control algorithms over the available actuators within the tokamak. Such decision-making process must run in real time since its outcome depends on the plasma state. Therefore, control architectures including supervisory and/or exception-handling algorithms will play an essential role in future fusion reactors like ITER. However, most plasma-control experiments in present devices have focused so far on demonstrating control solutions for isolated objectives. In this work, initial experimental results are reported for simultaneous current-profile control, normalized-beta control, and Neoclassical Tearing Mode (NTM) suppression in DIII-D. Neutral beam injection (NBI), electron-cyclotron (EC) heating & current drive (H&CD), and plasma current modulation are the actuation methods. The NBI power and plasma current are always modulated by the Profile Control category within the DIII-D Plasma Control System (PCS) in order to control both the current profile and the normalized beta. EC H&CD is utilized by either the Profile Control or the Gyrotron categories within the DIII-D PCS as dictated by the Off-Normal and Fault Response (ONFR) system, which monitors the occurrence of an NTM and regulates the authority over the gyrotrons. The total EC power and poloidal mirror angles are the gyrotron-related actuation variables. When no NTM suppression is required, the gyrotrons are used by the Profile Control category, but when NTM suppression is required, the ONFR transfers the authority over the gyrotrons to the NTM stabilization algorithm located in the Gyrotron category. Initial experimental results show that simultaneous control of different aspects of the plasma dynamics may improve the overall control and plasma performances. Also, the potential of the ONFR system to successfully integrate competing control algorithms is demonstrated.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2017

Overview of the preliminary design of the ITER plasma control system

An overview of the Preliminary Design of the ITER Plasma Control System (PCS) is described here, which focusses on the needs for 1st plasma and early plasma operation in hydrogen/helium (H/He) up to a plasma current of 15 MA with moderate auxiliary heating power in low confinement mode (L-mode). Candidate control schemes for basic magnetic control, including divertor operation and kinetic control of the electron density with gas puffing and pellet injection, were developed. Commissioning of the auxiliary heating systems is included as well as support functions for stray field topology and real-time plasma boundary reconstruction. Initial exception handling schemes for faults of essential plant systems and for disruption protection were developed. The PCS architecture was also developed to be capable of handling basic control for early commissioning and the advanced control functions that will be needed for future high performance operation. A plasma control simulator is also being developed to test and validate control schemes. To handle the complexity of the ITER PCS, a systems engineering approach has been adopted with the development of a plasma control database to keep track of all control requirements.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2016

Progress and plan of KSTAR plasma control system upgrade

The plasma control system (PCS) has been one of essential systems in annual KSTAR plasma campaigns: starting from a single-process version in 2008, extensive upgrades are done through the previous 7 years in order to achieve major goals of KSTAR performance enhancement. Here, major implementations are explained in this paper. In consequences of successive upgrades, the present KSTAR PCS is able to achieve ~48 s of 500 kA plasma pulses with full real-time shaping controls and real-time NB power controls. It has become a huge system capable of dealing with 8 separate categories of algorithms, 26 actuators directly controllable during the shot, and real-time data communication units consisting of +180 analog channels and +600 digital input/outputs through the reflective memory (RFM) network. The next upgrade of the KSTAR PCS is planned in 2015 before the campaign. An overview of the upgrade layout will be given for this paper. The real-time system box is planned to use the CERN MRG-Realtime OS, an ITER-compatible standard operating system. New hardware is developed for faster real-time streaming system for future installations of actuators/diagnostics.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗