Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Hunter, Bryan Keeney

Publications and source records attributed to Hunter, Bryan Keeney.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Effects of Structure and Filler on Mechanical Properties of Direct Ink Write Pads

Direct ink write (DIW) is an extrusion-based additive manufacturing (AM) technique that enables superior repeatability, property tuning, and material customization compared to conventional manufacturing techniques. In this research, DIW is used to print silicone foams that must accommodate the thermal expansion of other parts. This expansion requires the material to compress and subsequently recover. Thus, a key performance metric is reducing “compression set” or deformation retained after the material is compressed. For this study, a silicone resin was compounded with a getter material, 1,4 bis(phenylethynyl)benzene (DEB) mixed with carbon-supported palladium (Pd) and printed in a variety of lattice structures. The effects of the filler and print structure on compression set were evaluated. In these experiments, 0.5-inch diameter coupons were compressed to 75% their original height for 22 hours at 70 °C, and the change in height calculated at intervals between 30 minutes and 24 hours post-decompression. The unfilled pad with skin layers had the best compression set at 0.7% ± 0.1%, followed by the unfilled pad with no skins at 1.5% ± 0.1%. As the number of filled layers increased, compression set performance degraded. The pad with filled skin layers and all filled layers had a compression set of 7.0% ± 0.3%. Additionally, the reaction extent of DEB was found to increase compression set, possibly due to the diffusion of DEB to the surface at elevated temperatures. Imaging reveals extensive crystallization at the surface. These investigations show that a non-reinforcing filler will increase compression set but that print structure can mitigate this effect.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Optimizing Aluminum Bonding: Exploring Surface Roughness and Contact Angle Effects through Plasma and Acid Etching Contrasts.

The use of adhesives to replace traditional techniques like welding and riveting has been on the rise in various industries as increasingly complex geometries and situations for bonding is required. It’s well known in the scientific community that an adhesive bond is only as efficient as the surface preparation used beforehand. Plasma treatments have been shown to gently clean the surface by only removing the top-most layer from the adherend and “charging” the surface instead of berating it. Whereas chemical treatments “etch” the surface in hopes of increasing surface area by increasing surface roughness. This method can be difficult to control quantitatively and can generate waste leading to serious environmental concerns. This study aims to address the encountered differences between plasma treatments and acid etching on aluminum substrates for adhesive bonding. Treating the surface of adherends plays a crucial role in promoting a good bond between adhesive and adherend. In this study, the effects of plasma and acid treatments are categorized using surface roughness measurements as well as contact angle which have been shown to correlate to mechanical strength. When evaluating different surface treatments, it is notable to mention that not only surface roughness and contact angle play a role in determining which method is most effective but also the consequences of the treatment itself. It was found that although chemical etching was the most effective in increasing roughness and decreasing contact angle, it generates a large amount of waste and is not sustainable compared to plasma work which uses a renewable process. The results from this work provide a deeper understanding of the relationship between surface treatments and surface roughness/contact angle and how this relates to a stronger adhesive bond

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2024

Optimizing Aluminum Bonding: Exploring Surface Roughness and Contact Angle Effects through Plasma and Acid Etching Contrasts

The use of adhesives to replace traditional techniques like welding and riveting has been on the rise in various industries as increasingly complex geometries and situations for bonding is required. It’s well known in the scientific community that an adhesive bond is only as efficient as the surface preparation used beforehand. Plasma treatments have been shown to gently clean the surface by only removing the top-most layer from the adherend and “charging” the surface instead of berating it. Whereas chemical treatments “etch” the surface in hopes of increasing surface area by increasing surface roughness. This method can be difficult to control quantitatively and can generate waste leading to serious environmental concerns. This study aims to address the encountered differences between plasma treatments and acid etching on aluminum substrates for adhesive bonding. Treating the surface of adherends plays a crucial role in promoting a good bond between adhesive and adherend. In this study, the effects of plasma and acid treatments are categorized using surface roughness measurements as well as contact angle which have been shown to correlate to mechanical strength. When evaluating different surface treatments, it is notable to mention that not only surface roughness and contact angle play a role in determining which method is most effective but also the consequences of the treatment itself. It was found that although chemical etching was the most effective in increasing roughness and decreasing contact angle, it generates a large amount of waste and is not sustainable compared to plasma work which uses a renewable process. The results from this work provide a deeper understanding of the relationship between surface treatments and surface roughness/contact angle and how this relates to a stronger adhesive bond.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

X-ray Computed Tomography as a Metrology Technique for the Analysis of Additively Manufactured Material

X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) is an analytical technique used in materials science to non-destructively characterize features in a variety materials like polymer, metals, composites, and explosives. It also has the capability of imaging additively manufacture, machine and assembled parts. The non-destructive imaging allows for the analysis of features (voids and cracks), which give a fundamental understanding of the material characteristics. Additionally, X-ray CT can obtain accurate measurements of dimensional and topographic variations due to different stimuli and assess the accuracy of material production. This study focuses on parts manufactured via metal additive manufacturing (AM). Although AM produces parts faster and easier, the printing process can produce defects (pores and surface roughness) that undermine the part’s mechanical properties and performance. The analysis of 3D printed objects has an asset in that the material has an STL file from which the item was printed, which is not available in many manufactured materials (i.e., foams) due to stochastic structures. For this study, the print accuracy of four additively manufactured cylinders will be assessed via X-ray CTto approximate the surface roughness and visualize any major morphological changes to assess the dimensional accuracy of complex additively manufactured parts. It was concluded that using X-ray CT to measure surface roughness was affective because reasonable surface roughness values were measured. Additionally, itwas determined that small-scale features can be produced via additive manufacturing with strong dimensional accuracy so long as the features are highly complex with sharp grooves.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Compression Analysis of Materials via in situ X-ray Computed Tomography

X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) is an analytical technique used in materials science to non– destructively characterize features in a variety of materials like polymers, metals, composites, and explosives. The non-destructive imaging allows for the analysis of features (voids and cracks), which give a fundamental understanding of material characteristics.This is more effective when combinedwith a load cell to expose the material to realworld stimuli to understand material characteristics and morphological behavior in situ. This study focused on using in situ X-ray CT to understand the material characteristics and morphological changes of sugar prills and a lattice under a compressive load. Sugar prills are used as a surrogate to analyze explosives in a safer and less expensiveway. The sugar prills were found to be brittle and shattered when compressed via the CT renderings and the stress/strain information. The lattices are used as both the basis and ground truth comparison for the development of models to predict the morphological and material characteristic changes that occur as a result of loading. The lattice was found to have weak regions due to low polymer interlayer fusion in these regions during the printing process. It was also found that under the initial compression the lattice demonstrated elastic behavior as its cellular structure was intact until the cellular structure started to collapse causing yielding in the lattice. Additionally, the analysis of the sugar prills and lattice demonstrate the information that can be gleaned from in situ X-ray CT experiments that would be lost in traditional pre- and post-mortem X-rayCT analysis.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Surface Roughness Calculations of Additively Manufactured Cylinders via X-Ray Computed Tomography

X-ray Computed Tomography (X-ray CT) is an analytical technique used in materials science to non–destructively characterize features in variety of materials like polymers, metals, composites, and explosives. It also has the capability of imaging additively manufactured, machined and assembled parts and processes. The non-destructive imaging allows for the analysis of features (voids and cracks), which give a fundamental understanding of material characteristics. Additionally, X-ray CT can obtain accurate measurements of dimensional and topographic variations as a result of different stimuli, and assess accuracy of material production. This study will focus on parts manufactured via metal additive manufacturing (AM). Although, AM produces parts faster and easier, the printing process can produce defects (pores and surface roughness) that undermine the part’s mechanical properties. The analysis of 3D printed objects has a strength in analysis in that the material has an STL file from which the item was printed, which is not available in many manufactured materials (i.e. foams) due to stochastic structures. For this study, the print accuracy of several 3D printed cylinders will be assessed via X-ray CT to determine optimal printing parameters for parts with less defects and stronger mechanical properties. This will be accomplished by having the original STL file serve as the baseline surface to compute difference in the CT rendering to calculate surface roughness for each cylinders.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗