Engineering topics

Huelskamp, Scott

Publications and source records attributed to Huelskamp, Scott.

4 records

DOE OSTI2021

Demo 5: RapidClave Technology Demonstrations – Round II (Task 2)

The purpose of this project task was to make automotive composite part manufacturing more cost competitive for low volume production and thereby drive composite application innovation. The strategy was to incorporate low-cost preforming, snap cure resins, and RapidClave® processing to create an alternative to conventional automotive composite manufacturing based on SMC. The program used RapidClave® technology from Globe Machine Manufacturing, fast-curing (“snap cure”) epoxy resins from Hexion, and conformable/stretchable glass fiber reinforcement mats produced by Owens Corning for rapid preforming. O’Gara Armoring retrofits vehicles to meet special security needs, such as larger doors to facilitate easier entry into the vehicle. O’Gara has a variety of custom vehicles in need of custom doors that require affordable tooling to produce approximately 100 ship sets/year. The project focused on a composite door panel application provided by O’Gara that is currently made by manual chopped fiber spray-up processing. UDRI reverse-engineered the current composite door panel and created tooling for use in the RapidClave®. UDRI designed an improved composite door using MultiMat fiberglass reinforcement from Owens Corning. UDRI made snap cure resin films from Hexion resin. Finally, UDRI conducted molding trials to compare autoclave processing with RapidClave® processing. The technical goals of the project were to reduce tooling cost by 50% as compared to SMC compression molding and to reduce cycle time by 50% compared to current manual spray-up process. The approach to reduce tool costs is based on use of single sided tooling for use at 100 psi, as compared to matched metal SMC tooling. An added benefit realized from the program is that the Owens Corning mat provided more uniform thickness and improved performance. Tensile and flexural strengths and moduli were increased by at least 50%. This task also demonstrated a 75% decrease in cycle time. O’Gara is evaluating the technology demonstrated in this project for some of their current production. Additionally, there are new products O’Gara is pursuing which require higher production rates than their current products. O’Gara has identified these new products as good candidates for the RapidClave® technology. The cost advantages demonstrated by this project would then lead to significant economic development. In conclusion, this task successfully combined the RapidClave® technology from Globe with a snap cure epoxy resin film system from Hexion and preform material from Owens Corning. Further research is needed to better map the technical limits such as cycle time of these technologies. Additionally, the technology should be extended in terms of size and shape to include large parts outside of automotive applications, such as a small aircraft fuselage.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2021

Low-Cost Aero Technology Demonstrations

The main focus of this work was to demonstrate the use of polymeric additive manufacturing (AM) to create tooling for both preforming and consolidation. Polymeric tooling was utilized where both modest and higher pressures are used for part consolidation. The key focus for the AM tooling development was for fabrication of complex structures such as ducting, C-channel stiffened skins, and airfoils where conventional male tooling would typically be trapped in the cured part. The AM tooling was evaluated for use as a tool master used to fabricate and re-shape deformable/re-formable mandrels based on SpinTech’s shape memory composite technology known as Smart Tooling. The AM tooling was also evaluated for use as a mold for composite infusion and consolidation. Key performance parameters were tracked for project schedule completion with each step comprising of “art to part” cycle time, cost, and model fidelity for dimensions, performance, and cost. The primary focus of this demonstration was to determine if a 50% cost reduction was achievable, for each AM tooling-set, as compared to conventional processes. UDRI leveraged project partner SpinTech, who manufactures tools and parts in these categories and thus provided a baseline regarding current best practices and provided valuable feedback during the entirety of this demonstration. This demonstration primarily focused on the use of AM tooling for fabrication of three composite component structures which are typically utilized in aircraft and comprise salient geometric features of broad interest. These components are often tooling intensive and have features requiring extraction of male tools which are usually trapped by the geometry. The three structures selected by the team included: 1) A one-piece airfoil shell comprised of compound contours where male tooling would be trapped unless the part were manufactured in two halves as is typically the case. 2) A one-piece duct used for air handling, comprised of compound contours where male tooling would be trapped unless the part were manufactured in two halves, or a washout mandrel were to be used. 3) A co-cured C-channel stiffened skin where typically C-channels would be individually manufactured and then bonded to a cured skin. The demonstration was comprised of three main tasks: • Task 1: AM Tool Feasibility Study – ensure the AM tooling meets the performance requirements as specified by SpinTech to match baseline performance. • Task 2: Complex Tool Demonstration – Fabricate tooling, preforms, and parts representative of an airfoil and duct. • Task 3: Large Aerostructure Fabrication Demonstration – Fabricate tooling, preforms, and part representative of a C-channel stiffened skin. With the conclusion of this project, a decision tree was developed to determine the key considerations necessary to determine if use of AM tooling for the three selected structures was able to attain the same quality as historically achieved on metallic tooling, while providing a significant cost reduction.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2021

RapidClave Technology Demonstrations-II Kevlar Composite Vehicle Floor

This Demonstration’s objective was to develop enhanced methods to produce a complex preform comprised of Kevlar fabric and thermoplastic adhesive and rapidly consolidate the preform into the desired functional shape of a vehicular floor protection system. The approach and outcome goals were to reduce the tooling cost by 50% and shorten the processing time by 50% using the RapidClave® to consolidate the part rather than an autoclave. UDRI partnered with O’Gara Armoring who currently produces one piece Kevlar floor composite laminates that offer enhanced impact resistance at lighter weights as compared to steel. These laminates are constructed by hand layup of 3000 denier K29 fiber in a plain weave architecture with a thermoplastic film adhesive layer manufactured by Barrday and will be referred to as semi-preg throughout this paper. The current process is labor intensive and costly. Current production rates are only about one per month but an improved process is expected to enable product growth. A 50% reduction in tooling cost was achieved through the use of additive tooling, and the RapidClave® process enabled a 60% reduction in cycle time. Further cost savings were realized through the implementation of a preforming process that resulted in a 65% reduction in labor hours. This new approach for manufacturing reinforced vehicle floors has been partially implemented by O’Gara with plans to continue work on additional vehicle models. The cost savings has potential for increasing O’Gara’s production to reach new markets, and lead to job creation.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

DOE OSTI2021

5.5 Hybrid Additively Manufactured Tooling for Large Composite Structures

This program sought to lower tooling costs for tightly toleranced, large composite aerostructures by using large format additive manufacturing (LFAM). LFAM tooling has the potential to lower tooling costs, but the large and unpredictable thermal expansion of polymer-based tooling did not previously allow for the production of large structures made with high performance resins requiring 350 deg F cures. Geometric tolerance issues and demolding concerns continued to arise. The proposed approach for this work was to print a thin shell via additive manufacturing that would be used as a scaffold for a conventional tooling prepreg. The prepreg would be laminated and cured onto both sides of the shell, creating a tool with a sandwich construction. The cured prepreg would then be machined and serve as the tooling surface. In addition to providing a clean, pit-free surface, the prepreg stiffness and low thermal expansion would physically restrain the AM shell and prevent it from expanding during thermal cycling, thus preventing any geometric mismatch between the nominal and actual part dimensions. A stair-step approach was taken to prove out this approach. Coupon level testing was done to ensure a good bond was possible between the AM shell and the tooling prepreg. These samples were also used to determine the amount of prepreg needed to achieve the desired coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE). The project team than progressed to a subscale tool measuring two feet in length. The geometry used was a C-section spar from Airbus’ Wing of Tomorrow program. A hybrid tool, using the AM shell and tooling prepreg, was made, and a composite part was fabricated with the tool. Dimensional scans of the tool and part indicated that the desired CTE was achieved with the tool. A second tooling approach was taken to reduce risk. In this approach, a subscale tool of the same geometry as previously mentioned was created, but the tool was entirely constructed of the tooling prepreg. AM was used to print a “master” that was then used to fabricate the tool by creating a splash off of the master using tooling prepreg. The innovation was that the master was not machined, but rather, was used right off the printer after a small amount of surface preparation. Removing this machining step was thought to make this approach economically viable when compared to conventional master fabrication. As before, the tool was used to fabricate a part and tested for dimensional accuracy. For the conclusion of the program, a ten-foot tool was created using the hybrid tool approach. The geometry also came from the Airbus C-section spar previously mentioned. Some difficulty arose in accurately predicting the geometry of the tool after laminating the tooling prepreg, resulting in multiple material additions and a tool geometry change. A part was fabricated in an autoclave using the tool. A cost savings of almost 50% was achieved on the subscale tool in both the hybrid and master-style tool, but the savings dropped considerably as the tool length increased in the full-scale tool. Given the less than expected cost savings and added complexity of the tool construction, it is suggested that the master-style tool is best for immediate commercialization for larger tools (although it may be appropriate for smaller, table-top size tools). Since its construction is very similar to conventionally made composite tooling, there already exists a broad supply chain for building the tool, and project partner Additive Engineering Solutions (AES) is well acquainted with the design and build of the AM master needed.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗