Model intercomparison of the ABL, turbines, and wakes within the AWAKEN wind farms under neutral stability conditions
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Hsieh, Alan S..
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A large-scale numerical computation of five wind farms was performed as a part of the American Wake Experiment (AWAKEN). This high-fidelity computation used the ExaWind/AMR-Wind LES solver to simulate a 100km × 100km domain containing 541 turbines under unstable atmospheric conditions matching previous measurements. The turbines were represented by Joukowski and OpenFAST coupled actuator disk models. Results of this qualitative comparison illustrate the interactions with wind farms with large scale ABL structures in the flow, as well as the extent of downstream wake penetration in the flow and blockage effects around wind farms.
The complexity and associated uncertainties involved with atmospheric-turbine-wake interactions produce challenges for accurate wind farm predictions of generator power and other important quantities of interest (QoIs), even with state-of-the-art high-fidelity atmospheric and turbine models. A comprehensive computational study was undertaken with consideration of simulation methodology, parameter selection, and mesh refinement on atmospheric, turbine, and wake QoIs to identify capability gaps in the validation process. For neutral atmospheric boundary layer conditions, the massively parallel large eddy simulation (LES) code Nalu-Wind was used to produce high-fidelity computations for experimental validation using high-quality meteorological, turbine, and wake measurement data collected at the Department of Energy/Sandia National Laboratories Scaled Wind Farm Technology (SWiFT) facility located at Texas Tech University’s National Wind Institute. The wake analysis showed the simulated lidar model implemented in Nalu-Wind was successful at capturing wake profile trends observed in the experimental lidar data.
In this work we investigate the behavior of stable marine boundary layers located near the coast of the Northeastern United States. Using the ExaWind large eddy simulation (LES) codes, three stable atmospheric conditions were chosen to match the Cape Wind measurements of Archer et al. with wind speeds of 5 m/s, 10 m/s, and 15 m/s at the 20 m measurement height. The behavior of the stable boundary layers, including mean flow quantities and turbulent statistics, are examined and compared to previous computations of the neutral and unstable offshore boundary layer at the same location. This study also examines the domain and mesh requirements necessary to capture the turbulent scales for the stable offshore boundary layers. Finally, we compare solutions computed using both Nalu-Wind and AMR-Wind solvers, and compare their predicted solutions and performance in this study.
In this study, large eddy simulations (LES) of offshore boundary layers near the Nantucket coast are performed using Nalu-Wind. The marine boundary layer conditions are chosen to match the predominantly unstable and neutral conditions measured by the Cape Wind platform. The appropriate domain, resolution, and boundary condition settings required for the LES are established through this work. Differences between stable and unstable cases are found in the wind speed profiles, averaged statistics, and wind spectra, and explained in terms of stratification effects.
Previous research has revealed the need for a validation study that considers several wake quantities and code types so that decisions on the trade-off between accuracy and computational cost can be well informed and appropriate to the intended application. In addition to guiding code choice and setup, rigorous model validation exercises are needed to identify weaknesses and strengths of specific models and guide future improvements. Here, we consider 13 approaches to simulating wakes observed with a nacelle-mounted lidar at the Scaled Wind Technology Facility (SWiFT) under varying atmospheric conditions. We find that some of the main challenges in wind turbine wake modeling are related to simulating the inflow. In the neutral benchmark, model performance tracked as expected with model fidelity, with large-eddy simulations performing the best. In the more challenging stable case, steady-state Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations were found to outperform other model alternatives because they provide the ability to more easily prescribe noncanonical inflows and their low cost allows for simulations to be repeated as needed. Dynamic measurements were only available for the unstable benchmark at a single downstream distance. These dynamic analyses revealed that differences in the performance of time-stepping models come largely from differences in wake meandering. This highlights the need for more validation exercises that take into account wake dynamics and are able to identify where these differences come from: mesh setup, inflow, turbulence models, or wake-meandering parameterizations. In addition to model validation findings, we summarize lessons learned and provide recommendations for future benchmark exercises.