Engineering topics

Horanyi, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Horanyi, M..

41 records · Page 3

NASA NTRS1985

Trajectories of charged dust grains in the cometary environment

Using a simple model of the particles and fields environment of a comet, the trajectories of the smallest (micron- and submicron-sized) dust grains that are expected to be released from a cometary nucleus are calculated. It is shown that electromagnetic forces play a crucial role in the dynamics of these particles. The present calculations indicate not only the asymmetry of the sunward dust envelopes that have been suggested earlier by other authors, but they also indicate the possible existence of wavy dust features far down the tail, reminiscent of the peculiar wavy dust feature observed in the dust tail of Comet Ikeya-Seki 1965f. The importance of these findings in studying the lower end of the cometary dust mass spectrum during the forthcoming fly-by missions to Comet Halley is underscored.

Horanyi, M.↗

NASA NTRS1984

The friable sponge model of a cometary nucleus

The mantle/core model of cometary nuclei, first suggested by Whipple and subsequently developed by Mendis and Brin, is modified and extended. New terms are added to the heat conduction equation for the mantle, which is solved in order to obtain the temperature distribution in the mantle and the gas production rate as a function of mantle thickness and heliocentric distance. These results are then combined with some specific assumptions about the mantle structure (the friable sponge model) in order to make predictions for the variation of gas production rate and mantle thickness as functions of heliocentric distance for different comets. A solution of the time-dependent heat conduction equation is presented in order to check some of the assumptions.

Horanyi, M.↗

NASA NTRS1983

Charge exchange in solar wind-cometary interactions

A simple model of a cometary spherically symmetrical atmosphere and ionosphere is considered. An analytic solution of the governing equations describing the radial distribution of the neutral and ion densities is found. The new solution is compared to the well-known solution of the equations containing only ionization terms. Neglecting recombination causes a significant overestimate of the ion density in the vicinity of the comet. An axisymmetric model of the solar wind-cometary interaction is considered, taking into account the loss of solar wind ions due to charge exchange. The calculations predict that for active comets, solar wind absorption due to charge exchange becomes important at a few thousand kilometers from the nucleus, and a surface separating the shocked solar wind from the cometary ionosphere develops in this region. These calculations are in reasonable agreement with the few observations available for the ionopause location at comets.

Gombosi, T. I.↗

NASA NTRS1983

Charge-exchange in the magnetosheaths of Venus and Mars - A comparison

The amount of solar wind absorption due to charge-exchange in the Martian magnetosheath is evaluated and found to be about an order of magnitude less than that in the Venus magnetosheath. This difference might explain the observed difference in the scaled position and shape between the shocks at Venus and Mars. The lower solar wind absorption for Mars is attributable to the less dense hot oxygen corona of Mars compared to Venus.

Russell, C. T.↗

NASA NTRS1981

The role of charge exchange in the solar wind absorption by Venus

The amount of solar wind absorbed because of charge exchange processes in the dayside ionosheath of Venus is calculated. The calculations suggest the existence of a lower limiting ionopause altitude, below which all solar wind particles are removed from the flow by charge exchange. The cold, slow ions resulting from this interaction are thought to play an important role in building the magnetic barrier observed just outside the ionopause and in creating the dayside 'mantle' and downstream 'penumbra' regions. The total absorption caused by charge exchange is typically 2-5%, although when the solar wind dynamic pressure is very high, it can reach 16%.

Gombosi, T. I.↗