Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Harrison, Robert

Publications and source records attributed to Harrison, Robert.

Sulfidation of magnetite with incorporated uranium

Uranium (U) is a radionuclide of key environmental interest due its abundance by mass within radioactive waste and presence in contaminated land scenarios. Ubiquitously present iron (oxyhydr)oxide mineral phases, such as (nano)magnetite, have been identified as candidates for immobilisation of U via incorporation into the mineral structure. Studies of how biogeochemicalprocesses, such as sulfidation from the presence of sulfate-reducing bacteria, may affect iron (oxyhydr)oxides and impact radionuclide mobility are important in order to underpin geological disposal of radioactive waste and manage radioactively contaminated land. Here, this study utilised a highly controlled abiotic method for sulfidation of U(V) incorporated into nanomagnetite to determine the fate and speciation of U. Upon sulfidation, transient release of U into solution occurred (~8.6 % total U) for up to 3 days, despite the highly reducing conditions. As the system evolved, lepidocrocite was observed to form over a period of days to weeks. After 10 months, XAS and geochemical data showed all U was partitioned to the solid phase, as both nanoparticulate uraninite (U(IV)O2) and a percentage of retained U(V). Further EXAFS analysis showed incorporation of the residual U(V) fraction into an iron (oxyhydr)oxide mineral phase, likely nanomagnetite or lepidocrocite. Overall, these results provide new insights into the stability of U(V) incorporated iron (oxyhydr)oxides during sulfidation, confirming the longer term retention of U in the solid phase under complex, environmentally relevant conditions.

Townsend, Luke↗

Effects of 3d electron configurations on helium bubble formation and void swelling in concentrated solid-solution alloys

Currently, elemental specific chemical complexity is known to play a vital role in microstructure development in single-phase concentrated solid-solution alloys (SP-CSAs), including both He bubble formation and irradiation-induced void swelling. While cavity formation and evolution under ion irradiation at elevated temperature are complex nonequilibrium processes, chemical effects are revealed at the level of electrons and atoms herein in a simplified picture, using Ni and a special set of Ni-based SP-CSAs composed of 3d transition metals as model alloys. Based on Ni and the model alloys with minimized variables (e.g., atomic mass, size, and lattice structure), we report on the effects of chemically-biased energy dissipation, defect energetics, sluggish diffusion, and atomic transport on cavity formation and evolution under both self-ion Ni irradiation and He implantation. The observed difference in microstructure evolution is attributed to the effects of d electron interactions in their integrated ability to dissipate radiation energy. The exhibited impact of alloying 3d transition metals with larger differences in the outermost electron counts suggests a simple design strategy for tuning defect properties to improve radiation tolerance in structural alloys.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Basic Energy Sciences Roundtable: Opportunities for Quantum Computing in Chemical and Materials Sciences

Fundamental transformations in the basic logic of computing are few and far between. Since the invention of digital computers in the early 1940s, the logic underlying computation has remained the same, even as computing hardware evolved from vacuum tubes to silicon transistors. With the advent of quantum computation, a fundamental transformation is near. Quantum computation is based on a different type of logic: rather than being in one of the two states of a classical bit, a quantum bit or qubit can be in a superposition of two states simultaneously. Operations and measurements on these qubits obey the constraints of quantum mechanics. It is now understood that quantum computers have great power in principle to go beyond classical computers, but that not every application is well suited to implementation on quantum computers. For reasons explained in more detail in the Introduction, scientific problems in chemical and materials sciences are uniquely suited to take advantage of quantum computing in the relatively near future. Indeed, quantum computing offers the best hope to solve many of the most important and difficult problems in this field. For example, quantum materials, such as superconductors and complex magnetic materials, show novel kinds of ordered phases that are natural from the point of view of quantum mechanics but difficult to access via computation on classical computers. Quantum sensors based on solid materials are already widely used but could be greatly improved with insight from quantum computations, as could materials for information technologies. Quantum chemical dynamics is another example of a problem that is intrinsically well suited to studies on quantum computers. Applications of quantum chemical dynamics include catalysis, artificial photosynthesis, and other industrially important processes. Quantum computers exist in the laboratory and are beginning to exceed 50 qubits, which is roughly the size beyond which their behavior cannot be predicted or emulated on present-day classical supercomputers. While a quantum computer of 50 qubits is almost certainly not powerful enough to tackle the major scientific challenges in chemical and materials sciences, some of these major challenges start to become accessible with a few hundred qubits if error rates can be kept small. This roundtable was convened to ask how emerging quantum computers can be applied to major scientific problems in chemical and materials sciences, in light of Basic Energy Sciences’s leading role in these fields and the Department of Energy’s leading role in high-performance scientific computation more generally. The main outcome of the roundtable was a consensus that there are scientific problems of great importance on which emerging quantum computers have the potential for disruptive impact, and where comparable progress is unlikely to occur by other means.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Analyzing diffuse scattering with supercomputers. Corrigendum

The study by Michels-Clark et al. (2013 [Michels-Clark, T. M., Lynch, V. E., Hoffmann, C. M., Hauser, J., Weber, T., Harrison, R. & Bürgi, H. B. (2013). J. Appl. Cryst. 46, 1616-1625.]) contains misleading errors which are corrected here. The numerical results reported in that paper and the conclusions given there are not affected and remain unchanged. The transition probabilities in Table 1 (rows 4, 5, 7, 8) and Fig. 2 (rows 1 and 2) of the original paper were different from those used in the numerical calculations. Corrected transition probabilities as used in the computations are given in Table 1 and Fig. 1 of this article. The Δ parameter in the stacking model expresses the preference for the fifth layer in a five-layer stack to be eclipsed with respect to the first layer. This statement corrects the original text on p. 1622, lines 4–7. In the original Fig. 2 the helicity of the layer stacks b L and b R in rows 3 and 4 had been given as opposite to those in rows 1, 2 and 5. Fig. 1 of this article shows rows 3 and 4 corrected to correspond to rows 1, 2 and 5.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗