Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Gross, L. W.

Publications and source records attributed to Gross, L. W..

The prediction of two-dimensional airfoil stall progression

A generalized boundary condition potential flow calculation method was combined with a momentum integral boundary layer method and a base flow theory of separation to predict airfoil viscous-inviscid interference up to and beyond stall. The resultant program considers laminar and turbulent separation and is, therefore, applicable to thin or thick airfoil stall. The calculated flow field includes the airfoil and the separation bubble recombination region behind the airfoil. Calculated pressure distributions and equivalent airfoil shapes, including the displacement thickness of the viscous regions, are compared with flow field measurements for several airfoils. The measured displacement thicknesses and wake centerlines corroborate the calculated shape. The comparison also suggests the use of the analytical solution to evaluate the measurements.

Gross, L. W.↗

Multi-element airfoil viscous-inviscid interactions

Subsonic viscous-inviscid interactions for multi-element airfoils are predicted by iterating between inviscid and viscous solutions until the performance coefficients converge. Inviscid flow is modelled by using distributed source-vortex singularities on configuration surface panels. Viscous effects are calculated by an existing laminar separation bubble model and a NASA-Lockheed boundary layer-wake method. Numerical formulations and example calculations are presented.

Gross, L. W.↗

Comparison of vortex lattice predicted forces with wind tunnel experiments for the F-4E(CCV) airplane with a closely coupled canard

The F-4E (CCV) wind tunnel model with closely coupled canard control surfaces was analyzed by means of a version of a vortex lattice program that included the effects of nonlinear leading edge or side edge vortex lift on as many as four individual planforms. The results were compared with experimental data from wind tunnel tests of a 5% scale model tested at a Mach number M = 0.6. They indicated that a nonlinear vortex lift developed on the side edges due to tip vortices, but did not appear to develop on the leading edges within the range of angles of attack that were studied. Instead, substantial leading edge thrust was developed on the lifting surfaces. A configuration buildup illustrated the mutual interference between the wing and control surfaces. On the configuration studied, addition of the wing increased the loading on the canard, but the additional load on the canard due to adding the stabilator was small.

Gross, L. W.↗