Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Groesbeck, D. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Groesbeck, D. E..

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1986

Progress in the Lewis Research Center Altitude Wind Tunnel (AWT) Modeling Program

The rehabilitation of the Altitude Wind Tunnel (AWT) at the NASA Lewis Research Center is under study with the goal of providing a modern subsonic wind tunnel for conducting propulsion system/airframe integration, isolated propulsion system, propulsion acoustics and adverse weather tests. Because of the increased Mach number capability (from Mach 0.6 to 0.9 plus) and the incorporation of acoustic and adverse weather capabilities into an existing tunnel, the AWT rehabilitation represents a significant technical challenge. In order to reduce the risk associated with such an undertaking, and extensive AWT modeling program is being conducted to guide and verify the tunnel design. Significant findings and progress in this modeling program are the subject of this paper.

Ciepluch, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Progress in the Lewis Research Center Altitude Wind Tunnel (AWT) modeling program

The rehabilitation of the AWT at the NASA Lewis Research Center is under study with the goal of providing a modern subsonic wind tunnel for conducting propulsion system/airframe integration, isolated propulsion system, propulsion acoustics and adverse weather tests. Because of the increased Mach number capability (from Mach 0.6 to 0.9 plus) and the incorporation of acoustic and adverse weather capabilities into an existing tunnel, the AWT rehabilitation represents a significant technical challenge. In order to reduce the risk associated with such an undertaking, an extensive AWT modeling program is being conducted to guide and verify the tunnel design. Significant findings and progress in this modeling program are the subject of this paper.

Ciepluch, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Static jet noise test results of four 0.35 scale-model QCGAT mixer nozzles

As part of the NASA Quiet Clean General Aviation Turbofan (QCGAT) engine mixer-nozzle exhaust system program, static jet exhaust noise was recorded at microphone angles of 45 to 155 deg relative to the nozzle inlet for a conventional profile coaxial nozzle and three 12-lobed coaxial mixer nozzles. Both flows in all four nozzles are internally mixed before being discharged from a single exhaust nozzle. The conventional profile coaxial nozzle jet noise is compared to the current NASA Lewis coaxial jet noise prediction and after applying an adjustment to the predicted levels based on the ratio of the kinetic energy of the primary and secondary flows, the prediction is within a standard deviation of 0.9 dB of the measured data. The mass average (mixed flow) prediction is also compared to the noise data for the three mixer nozzles with a reasonably good fit after applying another kinetic energy ratio adjustment (standard deviation of 0.7 to 1.5 dB with the measured data). The tests included conditions for the full-scale engine at takeoff (T.O.), cutback (86% T.O.) and approach (67% T.O.).

Groesbeck, D. E.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Low frequency noise in a quiet, clean, general aviation turbofan engine

A quiet, clean, general aviation, turbofan engine was instrumented to measure the fluctuating pressures in the combustor, turbine exit duct, engine nozzle and the far field. Both a separate flow nozzle and an internal mixer nozzle were tested. The fluctuating pressure data are presented in overall pressure and power levels and in spectral plots. The combustor data are compared to recent theory and found to be in excellent agreement. The results indicate that microphone correction procedures for elevated mean pressures are questionable. Ordinary coherence function analysis suggests the presence of an additional low frequency noise source downstream of the turbine that is due to the turbine itself. Low frequency narrowband data and coherence function analysis are presented.

Huff, R. G.↗
NASA NTRS1983

JT150 1/2-scale nozzle jet noise experiment and comparison with prediction

As part of a program to study flight effects on the exhaust noise of a full scale JT15D engine, static half scale model jet noise experiments were conducted. Acoustic data were recorded for microphone angles of 45 deg to 155 deg with jet conditions for the model scale nozzle corresponding closely to those at 55, 73 and 97 percent of corrected rated speed for the full scale engine. These data are useful for determining the relative importance of jet and core noise in the static full scale engine test data and will in turn allow for a proper evaluation of flight effects on the exhaust noise results. The model scale data are also compared with the coaxial jet noise prediction. Above 1000 Hz, the prediction is nominally 0 to 3 dB higher than the data. The arithmetic mean of the differences between the experimental OASPL and the predicted OASPL for all angles for each run ranged from 0 to -3.2 dB. The standard deviation of all the OASPL differences is 2.2 dB. The discrepancies are greatest at low primary jet velocities and appear to be due to inadequacy in the variable jet density exponent incorporated in the prediction procedure.

Groesbeck, D. E.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Comparison of predicted engine core noise with current and proposed aircraft noise certification requirements

Predicted engine core noise levels for subsonic CTOL aircraft engines are compared with measured total aircraft noise levels and to current and proposed federal noise certification requirements. Comparisons are made at FAR-36 measuring stations and take into consideration both full and cutback power operations at takeoff. The spectral shape used for the prediction of core noise is identified as the spectral envelope, with a peak at 400 Hz which is assumed to be shifted in flight by a Doppler shift in frequency. Preceived noise levels are computed for appropriate engine power settings at desired flight conditions, and reductions in sideline noise levels are made to account for jet and airframe shielding effects. Results indicate that core noise can provide a barrier to the proposed EPA stage 4 and 5 federal noise rules for wide-body aircraft, with the most severe core noise problem occurring at takeoff and sideline measuring stations.

Von Glahn, U. H.↗
NASA NTRS1981

An improved prediction method for noise generated by conventional profile coaxial jets

A semi-empirical model for predicting the noise generated by conventional-velocity-profile jets exhausting from coaxial nozzles is presented and compared with small-scale static and simulated flight data. The present method is an updated version of that part of the original NASA Aircraft Noise Prediction (ANOP) Program (1974) relating to coaxial jet noise. That method has been shown to agree reasonably well with model and full-scale experimental data except at high jet velocities in the region near the jet axis. Improvements to the basic circular jet noise prediction have been developed since that time which improve the accuracy, especially at high jet velocity and near the jet axis, and are incorporated into the coaxial jet procedure in this paper. The new procedure is more theoretically based and has also been improved by some empirical adjustments.

Stone, J. R.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Comparison of predicted engine core noise with proposed FAA helicopter noise certification requirements

Calculated engine core noise levels, based on NASA-Lewis prediction procedures, for five representative helicopter engines are compared with measured total helicopter noise levels and proposed FAA helicopter noise certification requirements. Comparisons are made for level flyover and approach procedures. The measured noise levels are generally significantly greater than those predicted for the core noise levels, except for Sikorsky S-61 and S-64 helicopters. However, the predicted engine core noise levels are generally at or within 3 db of the proposed FAA noise rules. Consequently, helicopter engine core noise can be a significant contributor to the overall helicopter noise signature and, at this time, will provide a limiting floor to a further decrease in future noise regulations.

Vonglahn, U.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Comparison of predicted engine core noise with current and proposed aircraft noise certification requirements

Predicted engine core noise levels are compared with measured total aircraft noise levels and with current and proposed federal noise certification requirements. Comparisons are made at the FAR-36 measuring stations and include consideration of both full- and cutback-power operation at takeoff. In general, core noise provides a barrier to achieving proposed EPA stage 5 noise levels for all types of aircraft. More specifically, core noise levels will limit further reductions in aircraft noise levels for current widebody commercial aircraft.

Vonglahn, U. H.↗
NASA NTRS1981

An Improved Prediction Method for Noise Generated by Conventional Profile Coaxial Jets

A semiempirical model for predicting the noise generated by conventional velocity profile jets exhausting from coaxial nozzles is presented and compared with small scale static and simulated flight data. Improvements to the basic circular jet noise prediction are developed which improve the accuracy, especially at high jet velocity and near the jet axis.

Stone, J. R.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Interim noise correlation for some OTW configurations using external jet-flow deflectors

Jet flap interaction acoustic data obtained statically from a model-scale study of STOL-OTW configurations with a conical nozzle mounted above the wing and using various external deflectors to provide jet-flow attachment are correlated. The acoustic data are correlated in terms that consider the jet/flap interaction noise contributions associated primarily with fluctuating lift, trailing edge, and configuration wake noise sources. Variables considered include deflector geometry, flap setting and wing size. Finally, the configuration overall noise levels are related to static lift and thrust measurements in order to provide insight into possible acoustic/aerodynamic performance trade-off benefits.

Vonglahn, U. H.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Comparison of jet Mach number decay data with a correlation and jet spreading contours for a large variety of nozzles

Small-scale circular, noncircular, single- and multi-element nozzles with flow areas as large as 122 sq cm were tested with cold airflow at exit Mach numbers from 0.28 to 1.15. The effects of multi-element nozzle shape and element spacing on jet Mach number decay were studied in an effort to reduce the noise caused by jet impingement on externally blown flap (EBF) STOL aircraft. The jet Mach number decay data are well represented by empirical relations. Jet spreading and Mach number decay contours are presented for all configurations tested.

Groesbeck, D. E.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Flap noise and aerodynamic results for model QCSEE over-the-wing configurations

Noise spectra in three dimensions and aerodynamic data were measured for a model of the NASA quiet clean short-haul experimental engine (QCSEE) over-the-wing configuration. The effects of flap length, nozzle exhaust velocity, and nozzle geometry were determined using a single nozzle and wing-flap segment. The scaled-up model data is representative of full scale flap noise with the QCSEE engine.

Olsen, W.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Cold-flow acoustic evaluation of a small scale, divergent, lobed nozzle for supersonic jet noise suppression

A supersonic jet noise suppressor was tested with cold flow for acoustic and thrust characteristics at nozzle- to atmospheric-pressure ratios of 1.5 to 4.0. Jet noise suppression and spectral characteristics of the divergent, lobed, suppressor (DLS) nozzle with and without an ejector are presented. Suppression was obtained at nozzle pressure ratios of 2.5 to 4.0. The largest, maximum-lobe, sound pressure level suppression with a hard-wall ejector was 14.6 decibels at a nozzle pressure ratio of 3.5. The thrust loss was 2 percent. In general, low-frequency jet noise was suppressed, leaving higher frequencies essentially unchanged. Without the ejector the nozzle showed a thrust loss of 11 percent together with slightly poorer noise suppression.

Huff, R. G.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Influence of mixer nozzle velocity decay characteristics on CTOL-OTW jet noise shielding

Jet noise shielding benefits for CTOL engine-over-the-wing configurations were obtained with model scale multitube and lobed mixer nozzles and various shielding surface geometries. Spectral data were obtained with jet velocities from 585 to 1110 ft/sec. Correlation equations for predicting jet noise shielding benefits with single conical nozzle installations were modified to correlate the mixer nozzle data. The modification included consideration of the number of nozzle elements and the peak axial velocity decay in the flow field adjacent to the shielding surface. The effect of forward velocity on jet noise attenuation by a shielding surface is discussed.

Vonglahn, U.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Geometric factors affecting noise suppresion and thrust loss of divergent-lobe supersonic jet noise suppressor

The thrust loss and noise suppression of a divergent-lobe supersonic jet noise suppressor were experimentally determined over a range of nozzle pressure ratios of 1.5 to 4.0. These small-scale cold flow tests were made to determine the effect on thrust and noise of: suppressor length, rearward facing step height, suppressor divergence angle, and ejector shroud length and location. Noise suppression was achieved at nozzle pressure ratios of 2.5 and greater. Maximum lobe jet noise attenuation of 15 db with thrust loss differences of 1.5 percent compared to the convergent nozzle were obtained at a nozzle pressure ratio of 3.5 with an ejector shroud two nozzle diameters long. Without the ejector the attenuation was 13 db with thrust loss differences of 11 percent. Short suppressors approximately one primary nozzle throat diameter long performed as well as longer suppressors. Rearward facing step height had a significant effect on noise suppression. Ejector shrouds two nozzle diameters in length are feasible.

Huff, R. G.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Noise tests of a mixer nozzle-externally blown flap system

Noise tests were conducted on a large scale model of an externally blown flap lift augmentation system, employing a mixer nozzle. The mixer nozzle consisted of seven flow passages with a total equivalent diameter of 40 centimeters. With the flaps in the 30 - 60 deg setting, the noise level below the wing was less with the mixer nozzle than when a standard circular nozzle was used. At the 10 - 20 deg flap setting, the noise levels were about the same when either nozzle was used. With retracted flaps, the noise level was higher when the mixer nozzle was used.

Goodykoontz, J. H.↗