Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Gougar, Hans D.

Publications and source records attributed to Gougar, Hans D..

Parfume (particle Fuel Model)

PARFUME is an advanced gas-cooled reactor fuel performance modeling and analysis code. It has been developed as an integrated mechanistic code that evaluates the thermal, mechanical, and physio-chemical behavior of fuel particles during irradiation and postulated accident conditions to determine the failure probability of a population of fuel particles given the particle-to-particle statistical variations in physical dimensions and material properties that arise from the fuel fabrication process, accounting for all viable mechanisms that can lead to particle failure. The code also determines the diffusion of fission products from the fuel through the particle coating layers, and through the fuel matrix to the coolant boundary. The subsequent release of fission products is calculated at the fuel element level (release of fission products from the compact or pebble). PARFUME calculates the release fraction as the ratio of the number of atoms released from the fuel element to the amount.

Gougar, Hans D.↗

Heat Storage Coupled to Generation IV Reactors for Variable Electricity from Base-load Reactors: Workshop Proceedings. Changing markets, technology, nuclear-renewables integration and synergisms with solar thermal power systems

Electricity markets are changing because of (1) the addition of wind and solar that creates volatile electricity prices including times of zero-priced electricity and (2) the goal of a low-carbon world that requires replacing fossil fuels that provide (a) energy, (b) stored energy, and (c) dispatchable energy. Wind and solar provide energy but not the other two other energy functions that are provided fossil fuels. Nuclear energy with heat storage can provide all three functions and thus replace fossil fuels.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Gas-cooled Fast Reactor Research and Development Roadmap

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) commissioned the development of technology roadmaps for advanced (non-light water reactor) reactor concepts to help focus research and development funding over the next five years. The roadmaps show the research and development needed to support demonstration of an advanced (non-LWR) concept by 2030, consistent with DOE’s Vision and Strategy for the Development and Deployment of Advanced Reactors. The starting point for the roadmaps is the Technical Readiness Assessment performed as part of an Advanced Test and Demonstration Reactor study released in 2016. The roadmaps were developed based upon a review of technical reports and vendor literature summarizing the technical maturity of each concept and the outstanding research and development needs. Critical path tasks for specific systems were highlighted on the basis of time and resources needed to complete the tasks and the importance of the system to the performance of the reactor concept. The roadmaps are intended to be generic, i.e. not specific to a particular vendor’s design, but features of the General Atomics EM2 were included to provide specific examples to illuminate needed R&D tasks to be conducted in support of demonstration in the 2030-2035 window. This report provides the roadmaps to engineering demonstration for of a Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor with an outlet temperature around 850 C. The selection of tasks and associated timelines rely heavily upon the Generation IV International Forum Technology Roadmaps and more recent information provided by a GFR developer, General Atomics.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

High Temperature Reactor Research and Development Roadmap, Draft for Public Comment

Nuclear power provides clean, reliable energy, contributing about 20 percent of the electricity generated in the United States. It supplies approximately 60 percent of our non-greenhouse-gas emitting power, making it our nation’s single largest contributor of carbon-free electricity. This vital component of the U.S. energy portfolio avoids hundreds of millions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions each year and supports hundreds of thousands of U.S. jobs, and yet is facing unprecedented challenges. Complex market factors, falling alternative generation costs and lower electricity demand forecasts have made operating nuclear power plants uneconomical in some parts of the country. The industry is confronting premature shut downs, a lack of new plants in the pipeline, profound market challenges and intense financing requirements. However, none of these challenges reflect a reduced need for this reliable and clean source of baseload power. Our nation’s nuclear sector urgently needs to adjust to these challenges to ensure continued availability of this vital national energy resource. The Department of Energy and its national laboratories are aggressively working to revive, revitalize, and expand U.S. nuclear energy capacity. We are advancing nuclear energy technologies through targeted early-stage investments to ensure a strong domestic industry now and into the future. By leveraging public-private partnerships and the national laboratory system, we are developing an advanced nuclear infrastructure, encouraging a resilient supply chain, and promoting a strong nuclear pipeline. A key element of this effort is to support the recent and rapid expansion in innovative advanced reactor development already being led by the U.S. nuclear industry. Advanced reactors, particularly non-light water reactor concepts, offer the potential for significant improvements to safety, economics and environmental performance, to help sustain and expand the availability of nuclear power as a clean, reliable and secure power source for our nation. As part of this strategy, the Department of Energy commissioned the development of technology roadmaps for advanced non-light-water reactor concepts. The starting point for the roadmaps is the technical readiness assessment performed as part of an advanced test and demonstration reactor study released in 2016 [ ]. The roadmaps show the Research and Development (R&D) needed to support demonstration of advanced reactor concepts, for either engineering demonstration or commercial demonstration depending on concept maturity, by 2035. The starting point for the roadmaps is the technical readiness assessment performed as part of an advanced test and demonstration reactor study released in 2016. The roadmaps were developed based on a review of technical reports and vendor literature summarizing the technical maturity of each concept and the outstanding R&D needs. Tasks for specific systems were highlighted on the basis of time and resources needed to complete the tasks and the importance of the system to the performance of the reactor concept. The roadmaps are intended to be generic (i.e., not specific to a particular vendor’s design); however, features of the General Atomics Energy Multiplier Module were included to provide specific examples for illuminating needed R&D tasks to be conducted in support of demonstration in the near future.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Gas-cooled Fast Reactor Research and Development Roadmap

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) commissioned the development of technology roadmaps for advanced (non-light water reactor) reactor concepts to help focus research and development funding over the next five years. The roadmaps show the research and development needed to support demonstration of an advanced (non-LWR) concept by 2030, consistent with DOE’s Vision and Strategy for the Development and Deployment of Advanced Reactors. The starting point for the roadmaps is the Technical Readiness Assessment performed as part of an Advanced Test and Demonstration Reactor study released in 2016. The roadmaps were developed based upon a review of technical reports and vendor literature summarizing the technical maturity of each concept and the outstanding research and development needs. Critical path tasks for specific systems were highlighted on the basis of time and resources needed to complete the tasks and the importance of the system to the performance of the reactor concept. The roadmaps are intended to be generic, i.e. not specific to a particular vendor’s design, but features of the General Atomics EM2 were included to provide specific examples to illuminate needed R&D tasks to be conducted in support of demonstration in the 2030-2035 window. This report provides the roadmaps to engineering demonstration for of a Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor with an outlet temperature around 850 C. The selection of tasks and associated timelines rely heavily upon the Generation IV International Forum Technology Roadmaps and more recent information provided by a GFR developer, General Atomics.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Consulting on HTGR Design and Analysis Methods - Lommers

The Advanced Reactor Technologies – Gas Cooled Reactor (ART-GCR) program has undertaken an effort to develop point designs of a gas-cooled, graphite moderated irradiation test reactor (TR) and a larger demonstration reactor (DR). The Department of Energy (DOE) is specifying requirements and performance metrics for these two systems. Both designs pose challenges, and their development will benefit from interaction with a potential vendor. The work defined in this subcontract supports the effort to generate point designs for gas-cooled test and demonstration reactors.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Selected Profiles of Burnup and Isotopic Concentrations in Pebble Bed High Temperature Reactor Fuel

Pebble Bed High Temperature Reactors (PB-HTRs) feature a unique fuel loading, burnup, and discharge process that is markedly different that a light water reactor or any other batch-loaded reactor that uses fixed fuel elements. During PB-HTR operation, small spherical fuel elements are dropped onto the top of the bed at small and regular intervals, 'trickle' through the core, and pass out of the core via a discharge chute at the bottom. Partially burnt pebbles are circulated back to the top of the core for another pass through the flux field. The process continues until the pebble achieves a specified discharge burnup. This results in high fuel utilization relative to a comparable batch-loaded fuel assembly which may or may not achieve full burnup depending upon where it is placed in the core. On the other hand, the radial and axial variation in the flux field and the random placement of each element on top of the bed mean that there will be a distribution of the final burnup and isotopic concentrations in spent fuel. This leads to some uncertainty in burnup analysis that has consequences for burnup monitoring (and thus efficient operation), source term quantification, and material accountability. The PEBBED code was developed specifically for the design and analysis of PB-HTRs. Although it is still under development, the code captures the important physics of cores fueled by dropping in, and if so configured, recirculating small graphite spheres in which the Tri-Isotropic (TRISO) coated particle fuel is embedded. In this study, the capabilities of the code for computing the isotopic contents of PBR fuel were exploited to examine and compare the variability of selected isotopes, in this case U-235, Pu-239, and Cs-137, in the fuel discharged from different PBR concepts. Results indicate the sensitivity of certain isotopes to the core geometry, mainly the presence of an inner reflector. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Design Studies for a Multiple Application Thermal Reactor for Irradiation Experiments (MATRIX)

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is a high power density test reactor specializing in fuel and materials irradiation. For more than 45 years, the ATR has provided irradiations of materials and fuels testing along with radioisotope production. Should unforeseen circumstances lead to the decommissioning of ATR, the U.S. Government would be left without a large-scale materials irradiation capability to meet the needs of its nuclear energy and naval reactor missions. In anticipation of this possibility, work was performed under the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program to investigate test reactor concepts that could satisfy the current missions of the ATR along with an expanded set of secondary missions. A survey was conducted in order to catalogue the anticipated needs of potential customers. Then, concepts were evaluated to fill the role for this reactor, dubbed the Multi-Application Thermal Reactor Irradiation eXperiments (MATRIX). The baseline MATRIX design is expected to be capable of longer cycle lengths than ATR given a particular batch scheme. The volume of test space in In-Pile-Tubes (IPTs) is larger in MATRIX than in ATR with comparable magnitude of neutron flux. Furthermore, MATRIX has more locations of greater volume having high fast neutron flux than ATR. From the analyses performed in this work, it appears that the lead MATRIX design can be designed to meet the anticipated needs of the ATR replacement reactor. However, this design is quite immature, and therefore any requirements currently met must be re-evaluated as the design is developed further.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Baseline Concept Description of a Small Modular High Temperature Reactor

The objective of this report is to provide a description of generic small modular high temperature reactors (herein denoted as an smHTR), summarize their distinguishing attributes, and lay out the research and development (R&D) required for commercialization. The generic concepts rely heavily on the modular high temperature gas-cooled reactor designs developed in the 1980s which were never built but for which pre-licensing or certification activities were conducted. The concept matured more recently under the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) project, specifically in the areas of fuel and material qualification, methods development, and licensing. As all vendor-specific designs proposed under NGNP were all both ‘small’ or medium-sized and ‘modular’ by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Department of Energy (DOE) standards, the technical attributes, challenges, and R&D needs identified, addressed, and documented under NGNP are valid and appropriate in the context of Small Modular Reactor (SMR) applications. Although the term High Temperature Reactor (HTR) is commonly used to denote graphite-moderated, thermal spectrum reactors with coolant temperatures in excess of 650oC at the core outlet, in this report the historical term High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) will be used to distinguish the gas-cooled technology described herein from its liquid salt-cooled cousin. Moreover, in this report it is to be understood that the outlet temperature of the helium in an HTGR has an upper limit of 950 degrees C which corresponds to the temperature to which certain alloys are currently being qualified under DOE’s ARC program. Although similar to the HTGR in just about every respect, the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) may have an outlet temperature in excess of 950 degrees C and is therefore farther from commercialization because of the challenges posed to materials exposed to these temperatures. The VHTR is the focus of R&D under the Generation IV program and its specific R&D needs will be included in this report when appropriate for comparison. The distinguishing features of the HTGR are the refractory (TRISO) coated particle fuel, the low-power density, graphite-moderated core, and the high outlet temperature of the inert helium coolant. The low power density and fuel form effectively eliminate the possibility of core melt, even upon a complete loss of coolant pressure and flow. The graphite, which constitutes the bulk of the core volume and mass, provides a large thermal buffer that absorbs fission heat such that thermal transients occur over a timespan of hours or even days. As chemically-inert helium is already a gas, there is no coolant temperature or void feedback on the neutronics and no phase change or corrosion product that could degrade heat transfer. Furthermore, the particle coatings and interstitial graphite retain fission products such that the source terms at the plant boundary remain well below actionable levels under all anticipated nominal and off-normal operating conditions. These attributes enable the reactor to supply process heat to a collocated industrial plant with negligible risk of contamination and minimal dynamic coupling of the facilities (Figure 1). The exceptional retentive properties of coated particle fuel in a graphite matrix were first demonstrated in the DRAGON reactor, a European research facility that began operation in 1964.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗