Engineering PapersSearch

Engineering topics

Gottlieb, Robert G.

Publications and source records attributed to Gottlieb, Robert G..

Normalization and Implementation of Three Gravitational Acceleration Models

Unlike the uniform density spherical shell approximations of Newton, the consequence of spaceflight in the real universe is that gravitational fields are sensitive to the asphericity of their generating central bodies. The gravitational potential of an aspherical central body is typically resolved using spherical harmonic approximations. However, attempting to directly calculate the spherical harmonic approximations results in at least two singularities that must be removed to generalize the method and solve for any possible orbit, including polar orbits. Samuel Pines, Bill Lear, and Robert Gottlieb developed three unique algorithms to eliminate these singularities. This paper documents the methodical normalization of two of the three known formulations for singularity-free gravitational acceleration (namely, the Lear and Gottlieb algorithms) and formulates a general method for defining normalization parameters used to generate normalized Legendre polynomials and Associated Legendre Functions (ALFs) for any algorithm. A treatment of the conventional formulation of the gravitational potential and acceleration is also provided, in addition to a brief overview of the philosophical differences between the three known singularity-free algorithms.

Eckman, Randy A.

Fast gravity, gravity partials, normalized gravity, gravity gradient torque and magnetic field: Derivation, code and data

Derivation of first and second partials of the gravitational potential is given in both normalized and unnormalized form. Two different recursion formulas are considered. Derivation of a general gravity gradient torque algorithm which uses the second partial of the gravitational potential is given. Derivation of the geomagnetic field vector is given in a form that closely mimics the gravitational algorithm. Ada code for all algorithms that precomputes all possible data is given. Test cases comparing the new algorithms with previous data are given, as well as speed comparisons showing the relative efficiencies of the new algorithms.

Gottlieb, Robert G.

Program For Simulation Of Trajectories And Events

Universal Simulation Executive (USE) program accelerates and eases generation of application programs for numerical simulation of continuous trajectories interrupted by or containing discrete events. Developed for simulation of multiple spacecraft trajectories with events as one spacecraft crossing the equator, two spacecraft meeting or parting, or firing rocket engine. USE also simulates operation of chemical batch processing factory. Written in Ada.

Gottlieb, Robert G.

Jacobi-Integral Method For Two-Body Problem

Jacobi-integral method enables efficient, accurate computation of trajectory of natural satellite or spacecraft perturbed by component of gravitational potential depending explicitly on both position and time. Instead of total energy, Jacobi integral, which is energylike constant of motion in this case, embedded in Newtonian differential equations of motion. Trajectories computed in fewer steps. With modifications, applicable to such terrestrial problems as motions of rotors and of beams of electrically charged particles in changing electrical and magnetic fields.

Bond, Victor R.

Relative motion using analytical differential gravity

This paper presents a new approach to the computation of the motion of one satellite relative to another. The trajectory of the reference satellite is computed accurately subject to geopotential perturbations. This precise trajectory is used as a reference in computing the position of a nearby body, or bodies. The problem that arises in this approach is differencing nearly equal terms in the geopotential model, especially as the separation of the reference and nearby bodies approaches zero. By developing closed form expressions for differences in higher order and degree geopotential terms, the numerical problem inherent in the differencing approach is eliminated.

Gottlieb, Robert G.