Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Goorjian, P. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Goorjian, P. M..

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1984

Unsteady transonic aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations about airfoils and wings

The development and application of transonic small disturbance codes for computing two dimensional flows, using the code ATRAN2, and for computing three dimensional flows, using the code ATRAN3S, are described. Calculated and experimental results are compared for unsteady flows about airfoils and wings, including several of the cases from the AGARD Standard Aeroelastic Configurations. In two dimensions, the results include AGARD priority cases for the NACA 64A006, NACA 64A010, NACA 0012, and MBB-A3 airfoils. In three dimensions, the results include flows about the F-5 wing, a typical wing, and the AGARD rectangular wings. Viscous corrections are included in some calculations, including those for the AGARD rectangular wing. For several cases, the aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations are compared with experimental results.

Goorjian, P. M.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Improvements in the accuracy and stability of algorithms for the small-disturbance and full-potential equations applied to transonic flows

Numerical techniques that improve the accuracy and stability of algorithms for the small disturbance and full potential equations used to calculate transonic flows are described. For the small disturbance equation, the algorithm improvements are: (1) the use of monotone switches in the type dependent finite differencing, and (2) the use of stable and simple second order accurate spatial differencing; these improvements are for steady and unsteady transonic flows. For the steady full potential equation, the improvement is in the use of a monotone switch in the type dependent finite differencing of an approximate factorization (AF2) algorithm. All these improvements are implemented in present computer codes by making minor coding modifications.

Goorjian, P. M.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Second-order-accurate spatial differencing for the transonic small-disturbance equation

Current methods for calculating transonic flows with the small-disturbance potential equation are typically only first-order accurate in the supersonic regions of the flow. However, calculations using the full-potential equation show significant improvements in accuracy when second-order methods are used instead of first-order methods. In this paper, algorithms for the small-disturbance equations are presented, for both steady and unsteady flows, with spatial differencing that is second-order accurate in both the subsonic and supersonic regions of the flow. These algorithms are stable, simple extensions of implicit monotone algorithms; the former are only first-order accurate spatially in the supersonic regions. Several calculations in one and two dimensions have been made, and the first- and second-order calculations are compared. In one dimension, the calculations include the four types of shock-wave motion. In two dimensions, the comparisons include steady flow over a Korn airfoil and unsteady flow over a pitching airfoil. All the comparisons in two dimensions show that the new methods are just as stable numerically as the old methods, but improve the accuracy of the solutions. The algorithm improvements can be implemented in present computer codes by making minor coding modifications.

Goorjian, P. M.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Effects of viscosity and modes on transonic aerodynamic and aeroelastic characteristics of wings

The unsteady transonic aerodynamic and aeroelastic behavior of a rectangular wing with a NACA 64A010 profile and a swept-back wing with a supercritical MBB-A3 profile is investigated analytically, applying 2D analysis of viscous effects to the 3D case. The results are presented in graphs and tables and discussed. It is found that the inclusion of viscous effects increases the flutter speed of the wings.

Guruswamy, G. P.↗
NASA NTRS1984

An efficient coordinate transformation technique for unsteady, transonic aerodynamic analysis of low aspect-ratio wings

An efficient coordinate transformation technique is presented for constructing grids for unsteady, transonic aerodynamic computations for delta-type wings. The original shearing transformation yielded computations that were numerically unstable and this paper discusses the sources of those instabilities. The new shearing transformation yields computations that are stable, fast, and accurate. Comparisons of those two methods are shown for the flow over the F5 wing that demonstrate the new stability. Also, comparisons are made with experimental data that demonstrate the accuracy of the new method. The computations were made by using a time-accurate, finite-difference, alternating-direction-implicit (ADI) algorithm for the transonic small-disturbance potential equation.

Guruswamy, G. P.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Transient decay times and mean values of unsteady oscillations in transonic flow

Kerlick and Nixon (1981) point out that if the time-marching solution is stopped before the transient is complete and the steady state is reached, then the incorrect conclusion may be reached that a change in the mean lift has occurred in response to the oscillating motion of the airfoil when in fact no such change has occurred. For a narrow Mach number range, however, the time for the transient to decay and for a steady state to be reached is extraordinarily long. What is more, for a very narrow range of Mach numbers, a nonzero mean value of lift can occur for an airfoil of symmetrical profile oscillations about a zero angle of attack. The reason why this nonzero average lift occurs only over a narrow range of Mach numbers has so far not been obtained.

Dowell, E. H.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Interactions of airfoils with gusts and concentrated vortices in unsteady transonic flow

Unsteady interactions of concentrated vortices and distributed free-stream gusts with a stationary airfoil have been analyzed in two-dimensional transonic flow. A simple method of introducing such disturbances has been implemented numerically in the well-known transonic small-disturbance code LTRAN2, and calculations have been performed for two important classes of current aerodynamic problems. The first, which demonstrates many of the essential features of the interactions between helicopter rotor blades and their trailing-vortex wakes, is that of a discrete potential vortex convecting past an airfoil. The second is the response of a transonic airfoil to a transverse periodic gust, with and without the alleviation that can be achieved by the proper active control motion of a trailing-edge flap. In both cases, unsteady effects are found to play important roles in the shock-wave motion, in the overall flow-field development, and consequently, in the air loads on the airfoil.

Mccroskey, W. J.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Monotone implicit algorithms for the small-disturbance and full potential equations applied to transonic flows

Numerical calculations of transonic flows by potential equations typically use algorithms that change the method of calculation for regions of subsonic and supersonic flow. In this paper, implicit approximate-factorization algorithms are modified to use the monotonic switch in the type of finite-differencing that was developed by Godunov for the Euler equations. Calculations of flows over airfoils by these algorithms are compared with calculations by other methods that are in common usage. For the small-disturbance potential equation, comparisons are made with the Murman-Cole method and the monotone method of Engquist and Osher for both steady and unsteady flows. For the full potential equation, comparisons are made with the methods of Jameson and of Holst and Ballhaus for steady flows. The comparisons show that the monotone methods are more stable. For steady flows, solutions are obtained for cases where the Murman-Cole switch requires a time step over ten times smaller in order for the calculations to remain stable. These improvements are achieved with no increase in computer storage and only minor modifications in current codes.

Goorjian, P. M.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Effects of viscosity on transonic-aerodynamic and aeroelastic characteristics of oscillating airfoils

Studies were made to investigate the effects of viscosity on aerodynamic and aeroelastic characteristics of oscillating airfoils. The computer code LTRAN2 (viscous), which is based on a small disturbance aerodynamic theory, was used to make aerodynamic computations. Two viscous models, the viscous-ramp model and the lag-entrainment model were considered. The unsteady viscous effects were obtained by use of the quasi-steady assumptions. Two cases, a conventional airfoil, NACA 64A010, and a supercritical airfoil, MBB-A3, were studied at Mach numbers 0.796 and 0.7557, respectively. For both the airfoils, steady and unsteady aerodynamic computations were made by using inviscid and viscous theories. The steady and the unsteady results for the NACA 64A010 airfoil and the steady results for the MBB-A3 airfoil were compared with the available wind-tunnel results. Flutter speeds were computed for both airfoils by using the U-g method and the effects of viscosity on the airfoils were studied. Results from the viscous methods show improvements over the inviscid method.

Guruswamy, P.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Flutter analysis of a transport wing using XTRAN3S

As part of the continuing process of evaluating and validating the XTRAN3S unsteady transonic aerodynamic computer program, the code has been applied to the flutter analysis of a transport type wing. The configuration analyzed was an aspect ratio 8 wing with a taper ratio of 0.4, a quarter chord sweep of 20 degrees and a NACA 65A-012 airfoil section. The analytical results compare well with the experimental flutter boundary and exhibit the classical 'transonic dip'. A literature search of available transport wing transonic flutter data is included.

Myers, M. R.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Implicit unsteady transonic airfoil calculations at supersonic freestreams

The computer code LTRAN2 has been extended to compute unsteady transonic flows about oscillating airfoils with supersonic freestreams. The LTRAN2 code uses an alternating direction implicit (ADI) algorithm to solve the two-dimensional, nonlinear, low-frequency, transonic small-disturbance (LF-TSD) equation. The modified code, LTRAN2-SS, includes a 'high-frequency' option. Steady solutions are checked against those computed by the steady TSD code, TSFOIL; unsteady computations of the linear LF-TSD equation are compared with known linear theory solutions; and new unsteady nonlinear solutions are presented. These cases include standard AGARD test cases for the NLR 7301, MBB-A3, and DO Al supercritical airfoils, as well as several NACA airfoils. The modified code enables aerodynamicists to quickly and efficiently compute transonic flows for both subsonic and supersonic freestreams, and thus resolve flutter boundaries through the full extent of the transonic dip phenomenon.

Chow, L. J.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Comparison between computations and experimental data in unsteady three-dimensional transonic aerodynamics, including aeroelastic applications

Comparisons were made of computed and experimental data in three-dimensional unsteady transonic aerodynamics, including aeroelastic applications. The computer code LTRAN3, which is based on small-disturbance aerodynamic theory, was used to obtain the aerodynamic data. A procedure based on the U-g method was developed to compute flutter boundaries by using the unsteady aerodynamic coefficients obtained from LTRAN3. The experimental data were obtained from available NASA publications. All the studies were conducted for thin, unswept, rectangular wings with circular-arc cross sections. Numerical and experimental steady and unsteady aerodynamic data were compared for a wing with an aspect ratio of 3 and a thickness ratio of 5% at Mach numbers of 0.7 and 0.9. Flutter data were compared for a wing with an aspect ratio of 5. Two thickness ratios, 6% at Mach numbers of 0.715, 0.851, and 0.913, and 4% at Mach number of 0.904, were considered. Based on the unsteady aerodynamic data obtained from LTRAN3, flutter boundaries were computed; they were compared with those obtained from experiments and the code NASTRAN, which uses linear aerodynamics.

Guruswamy, P.↗
NASA NTRS1981

A validation of LTRAN2 with high frequency extensions by comparisons with experimental measurements of unsteady transonic flows

A high frequency extension of the unsteady, transonic code LTRAN2 was created and is evaluated by comparisons with experimental results. The experimental test case is a NACA 64A010 airfoil in pitching motion at a Mach number of 0.8 over a range of reduced frequencies. Comparisons indicate that the modified code is an improvement of the original LTRAN2 and provides closer agreement with experimental lift and moment coefficients. A discussion of the code modifications, which involve the addition of high frequency terms of the boundary conditions of the numerical algorithm, is included.

Hessenius, K. A.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Implicit calculations of transonic flows using monotone methods

Implicit approximate-factorization algorithms have been developed that use monotone methods for the calculation of steady and unsteady transonic flows governed by the small-disturbance-potential equation. These algorithms use the new Engquist-Osher switch in the type-dependent differencing in place of the standard Murman-Cole switch. The resulting algorithms are more stable; hence, calculations can be done more efficiently. For steady flows, the convergence rate is about 35% faster, and for unsteady flows the allowable time step is about 10 times larger. These improvements are achieved with no increase in computer storage and with only minor modifications in codes that use the Murman-Cole switch. Also an implicit algorithm has been developed for the steady full-potential equation in one-dimension, which uses monotone methods.

Goorjian, P. M.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Implicit computations of unsteady transonic flow governed by the full-potential equation in conservation form

An alternating-direction implicit algorithm is presented for solving the conservative, full-potential equation for unsteady, transonic flow. A new development is the time-linearization of the density function. This linearization reduces the solution process from one of solving a system of two equations at each mesh point to one of solving a single equation. Two sample cases are computed. First, a one-dimensional traveling shock wave is computed and compared with the analytic solution. Second, a two-dimensional case is computed of a flow field that results from a thickening and subsequently thinning airfoil. The resulting flow field, which includes a traveling shock wave, is compared to the flow field obtained from the low-frequency, small-disturbance, transonic equation.

Goorjian, P. M.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Computations of unsteady transonic flow governed by the conservative full potential equation using an alternating direction implicit algorithm

A development was the time linearization of the density function. This linearization reduces the solution process from solving just a single equation. Two sample cases were computed. First, a one dimensional traveling shock wave was computed and compared with the analytic solution. Second, a two dimensional case was calculated for a flow field which resulted from a thickening and subsequently, thinning airfoil. The resulting flow field, which included a traveling shock wave, was compared to the flow field obtained from the low frequency, small disturbance, transonic equation.

Goorjian, P. M.↗