GT2023 Front Matter
Abstract The front matter for this proceedings is available by clicking on the PDF icon.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Gomez, Iker.
Abstract The front matter for this proceedings is available by clicking on the PDF icon.
Abstract The present study focuses on whether adapting low emissions liquid fuel injection concepts can be applied to gaseous mixtures. The goal is to develop an injector with specific geometric characteristics that will achieve the lowest emissions. This is conducted by evaluating emissions and flame diagnostics on a set of test hardware that has been developed for combustion of pure hydrogen and hydrogen/methane mixtures. The current test hardware adapts lean direct injection concepts from aeroengine injectors to a ground-based engine based on target flows associated with a Solar Turbines Industrial Engine gas turbine. A statistical test plan was developed to assess these geometric characteristics using a three level Box Behnken design. The test plan investigates the effect of injector flow splits, air swirl, fuel swirl, pressure drop, preheat temperature, fuel composition, and the adiabatic flame temperature on the flame structure and emissions performance. A total of 16 injectors were considered for a total of 688 test points for emission and imaging data. Emissions data were reported on a mass basis in ng/J and chemical reactor network analysis were conducted to further interpret emissions behavior. Images were also captured to analyze the flame structure features of interest including reaction volume, flame length, flame spread, and flame width. With these results, a predictive model for emissions was made to conclude the most optimal injector configuration is to have the highest level of air split (more volume of air through the injector plate versus the injector) and air swirl angle for both methane and hydrogen gas mixtures. The predictive emissions level for all of these cases were below 10 ng/J.
An aeroengine micromixing injector, originally designed for lean direct injection of jet fuel, was adapted to work with hydrogen, natural gas, and any blend in between. The ultimate goal of the design was to achieve low NOx emissions when operated on pure hydrogen; to better characterize its performance, flame imaging diagnostics was implemented. Three types of cameras mounted parallel to the injector base and pointing towards the quartz combustor cylinder with the same angle were operated simultaneously: Nikon D90, Dynacolor FB-N9-U, and Phantom v7.1, to capture the visible spectrum, OH* chemiluminescence, and dynamic behavior of the flames, respectively. The current work also includes the overlapping of visible spectrum and OH* chemiluminescence, as an effort to qualitatively define the heat release over the flame area, i.e., UV over visible domain. Additionally, a z-type schlieren configuration was employed to reinforce the presence of some small-scale details occurring near the injector outlet ports. Using the airbox pressure drop, preheat temperature, fuel composition and flame temperature as the factors of study, a Box Behnken model was designed yielding into a 16-points matrix for the operability region, at atmospheric pressure. The main responses were extracted from the OH* images, because of its correlation with the flame heat release, these being the flame area and its average brightness, the heat release area and its center of gravity and leading edge. To assess the importance of the main factors and their interactions, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for each response, considering as significant each contributor with a p-value below 0.05. For these five responses it was found that all four main factors need to be included into the model (most of them because its own significance, others to ensure the model hierarchy), as well as some common interactions as the preheat and flame temperatures or pressure drop and fuel composition, and quadratic terms from fuel composition or flame temperature. Three of the five models presented R2 and coefficient of variance (C.V.) indicators around 0.97 and 5%, respectively; the leading edge ANOVA yielded into R2=0.78 and C.V.=18.88%; and the heat release area showed R2=0.91 and C.V.=24.13%. Lastly, the confinement ratio effect of the combustor over the flame structure was quantified, for three different conditions: the original 80 mm inner diameter and 200 mm length cylinder was compared against a shorter 150 mm tube (same inner diameter) and a narrower 47 mm inner diameter one (same 200 mm length). The length had a smaller effect than the inner diameter, even though both factors were not strong enough to make a significant deviation on most of the flame parameters: the difference was within the repeatability margin of error for the brightness, flame area, and center of gravity and leading edge of the heat release area.