NEXT-C Flight Ion System Status
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to George Soulas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aerojet Rocketdyne (AR), under contract to NASA Glenn Research Center, built, tested and delivered the first flight version of the NEXT-C (NASA Evolutionary Xenon Thruster – Commercial) engine system. This system is comprised of a 7 kW thruster and power processing unit which are the commercial variants of the NEXT prototype thruster and power processing unit. In addition to developing the NEXT-C engine system for potential future NASA science missions, AR is dedicated to ensuring that this propulsion system is viable for commercial users and a wider variety of commercial applications. This paper will focus on the performance of the first flight model thruster, SN001, and presents an overview of the proto-flight testing environments and data obtained. For this first flight thruster, the proto-flight test sequence involved characterizing the performance of the thruster, in addition to vibration and thermal vacuum testing of the thruster. Between each of these environmental tests, the performance of the thruster was verified, ensuring that the environmental exposures, i.e. vibration and TVAC, did not affect the thruster performance. Specifically, the proto-flight data obtained included discharge chamber, optics and neutralizer performance. Faraday probe and ExB data obtained in the regions downstream of the thruster are presented and used to calculate thrust, and therefore specific impulse and total efficiency. Lastly, data are presented showing how the centroid of the ion beam, assumed to be indicative of the thrust vector location, varies throughout the entire proto-flight test campaign. The proto-flight testing of the NEXT-C PPU is documented in a previously published paper by Bontempo4. Following the proto-flight testing of the thruster, the thruster and its PPU successfully completed a System Integrated Test (SIT) tailored to the DART Mission. After the completion of the proto-flight testing, the SN001 thruster and SN002 PPU were delivered to APL for use on the DART mission.
This work summarizes a wear test focused on characterizing the erosion of the edges and side walls of the 12-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) pole covers as well as the impact of magnetic field strength on component erosion for operation at a discharge voltage of 600 V. Testing was performed with the AEPS Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster and accumulated approximately 325 hours of operation at the 600 V/12 kW condition with the magnetic field strength set to 75% of its nominal value. Thruster performance was invariant throughout the wear test for all thruster throttle conditions and matched previous measurements at the nominal magnetic field strength. Contrary to past results, inner front pole cover erosion rates were invariant to magnetic field strength at the 600 V/12 kW condition and no erosion was measured on the outer front pole cover. The erosion profile of the downstream inner front pole cover faces was continuous across the cover, indicating no significant change in erosion processes at the pole cover edges. Side wall erosion was only detected on the cathode-facing surfaces of the inner front pole cover and was equal in magnitude to the rates measured on the adjacent downstream edges. Taken together, these results suggest that erosion of the pole cover edges and sidewalls is driven by cathode-borne ions and will ultimately not impact AEPS life estimates.
This work presents a summary of the first wear test of the 12 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) focused on characterizing the erosion of the edges and side walls of the thruster pole covers. Testing was performed with the AEPS Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster and accumulated approximately 325 hours of operation at the 600 V/12 kW condition with the magnetic field strength set to 75% of its nominal value. Thruster performance was invariant throughout the wear test for all thruster throttle conditions and was found to be equal to previous measurements. Contrary to past results, inner front pole cover erosion rates were invariant to magnetic field strength at the 600 V/12 kW condition and no erosion was measured on the outer front pole cover. The erosion profile of the downstream inner front pole cover faces was continuous across the cover indicating no significant change in erosion process at the pole cover edges. Side wall erosion was only detected on the cathode-facing surfaces of the inner front pole cover and was equal in magnitude to the rates measured on the adjacent downstream edges. Taken together, these results suggest that erosion of the pole cover edges and sidewalls is driven by cathode-borne ions and will ultimately not impact AEPS life estimates.