Engineering topics

Gary A Ruff

Publications and source records attributed to Gary A Ruff.

8 records

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Spacecraft Fire Safety Technology Development Plan For Exploration Missions

To date, NASA’s spaceflight operations in the past 5 decades have been limited to a narrow range of conditions from a fire safety perspective. The currently anticipated missions outside of low earth orbit will substantially expand this parameter space to include, extended durations, dormancy intervals, increased oxygen concentrations, partial gravity conditions and the presence of surface dust. All of these changes can have significant impacts on fire safety system design and operations. The overall state of understanding is discussed in this paper along with the identification of the needs for spacecraft fire safety technology development. These needs have been assembled into a roadmap maintained by the Environmental Control and Life Support System Capability Leadership Team that has evolved as the exploration mission concepts have changed. This roadmap continues to communicate the spacecraft fire safety needs for exploration and guide technology development efforts. This paper summarizes the major recent developments in our understanding of spacecraft fire behavior and mitigation. A review of the major technology development needs and discussion of their objectives, status, and future plans is presented. The plan for transitioning knowledge, hardware, and modeling capability resulting from these development efforts to specific exploration vehicle programs and missions is also discussed.

Fire safety↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Environmental Control and Life Support Technology Development for Exploration: 2020 to 2021 Overview

This paper provides an overview of NASA supported activities developing Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLSS) technologies in the following capability areas: life support, environmental monitoring, fire safety, and logistics. NASA has been refining technology needs for deep space missions including Gateway, lunar surface, Mars transit, and Mars surface missions. Validating technologies in relevant environments, both in low earth orbit (LEO) and ground tests is critical in understanding technology performance and long duration performance. On-orbit and ground tests inform NASA’s technology decisions to fill exploration gaps. NASA has multiple technology projects across the technology readiness spectrum with potential to fill or partially fill exploration gaps. For each capability area, this paper will describe select capability gaps, NASA technology project maturation over the past year, and how key performance parameters (KPPs) are being used to measure the degree of capability gap closure. KPPs are evolving but they still provide a useful measure in communicating progress and identifying development needs to fill exploration gaps. The intent is to provide a very high-level overview describing the strategic approach to gap closure and provide references to additional technical details, progress, and KPPs.

Life Support↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Environmental Control and Life Support Technology Development for Exploration: 2020 to 2021 Overview

This paper provides an overview of NASA supported activities developing Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLSS) technologies in the following capability areas: life support, environmental monitoring, fire safety, and logistics. NASA has been refining technology needs for deep space missions including Gateway, lunar surface, Mars transit, and Mars surface missions. Validating technologies in relevant environments, both in low earth orbit (LEO) and ground tests is critical in understanding technology performance and long duration performance. On-orbit and ground tests inform NASA’s technology decisions to fill exploration gaps. NASA has multiple technology projects across the technology readiness spectrum with potential to fill or partially fill exploration gaps. For each capability area, this paper will describe select capability gaps, NASA technology project maturation over the past year, and key performance parameters (KPPs). KPPs are evolving but they still provide a useful measure in communicating progress and identifying development needs to fill exploration gaps. The intent is to provide a very high-level overview describing the projects that are supporting gap closure and provide references to additional technical details, progress, and KPPs.

James Lee Broyan↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Environmental Control and Life Support Technology Development for Exploration: 2020 to 2021 Overview

This PowerPoint presentation supports the following paper submission's abstract (STRIVES 20210015025). This paper provides an overview of NASA supported activities developing Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLSS) technologies in the following capability areas: life support, environmental monitoring, fire safety, and logistics. NASA has been refining technology needs for deep space missions including Gateway, lunar surface, Mars transit, and Mars surface missions. Validating technologies in relevant environments, both in low earth orbit (LEO) and ground tests is critical in understanding technology performance and long duration performance. On-orbit and ground tests inform NASA’s technology decisions to fill exploration gaps. NASA has multiple technology projects across the technology readiness spectrum with potential to fill or partially fill exploration gaps. For each capability area, this paper will describe select capability gaps, NASA technology project maturation over the past year, and key performance parameters (KPPs). KPPs are evolving but they still provide a useful measure in communicating progress and identifying development needs to fill exploration gaps. The intent is to provide a very high-level overview describing the projects that are supporting gap closure and provide references to additional technical details, progress, and KPPs.

Life Support↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Opposed Flame Spreading Along a Structured PMMA Sample in Exploration Atmosphere Under Microgravity

As part of SAFFIRE V experiments on the ISS supply spacecraft CYGNUS, flame propagation along different surface structures on a PMMA sample was investigated in opposed flow. The sample was 200 x 400 mm (length x width) with a thickness of 10 mm and contained ribs of different widths (1-10 mm), each 3 mm high, on both sides, arranged in the flow direction. The total thickness of the specimen was thus 16 mm for the ribs. For the first 360 s after ignition with a Kanthal wire, the flow velocity was 20 cm/s in the opposed direction. Then the flow velocity was reduced to 5 cm/s for a duration of 300 s before it was switched off to terminate the experiment. The experimental pressure was 761 hPa and the oxygen concentration was 26.9 vol %. These conditions correspond to atmospheric conditions envisioned for future exploration missions. It was found that the flames ignited downstream propagated forward along the rib edges surprisingly fast with up to 0.88 mm/s (1 mm rib width). Also, it was observed that the wider the rib, the slower the propagation. The widest rib (10 mm) already showed two largely independent edge flames. Unintentionally, the experiment showed how sensitive the flames are to small perturbations of the flow field, as remnants of a preceding and upstream experiment disturbed the incoming flow stratification partially.

microgravity↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Effect of Reduced Pressure on the Characteristics of Spreading Flames

Flame spread over solid fuels is a canonical problem in fire science, due to its direct implications on material flammability and importance in fire development. In a microgravity environment, such as onboard a spacecraft, flames can behave very differently than on Earth. This is concerning for spaceflight life safety, especially in higher-oxygen environments. Due to the difficulties associated with microgravity testing, low-pressure environments have been proposed as an alternative to approximately replicate the burning behavior of solid fuels observed in reduced gravity conditions because of similar diffusion and heat transfer mechanisms. However, the roles played by gravity and pressure on flame length, standoff distance, and flame spread rate vary with the burning configuration. In concurrent flame spread, the buoyant flow enhances the spread rate by bringing the flame closer to the fuel surface and increasing the heating of the solid fuel. In opposed flame spread, the sample is preheated by the flame ahead of the flame leading edge, which is strongly affected by the surrounding flow field. In this work, we consider flames spreading over thin cotton samples in both downward (opposed) and upward (concurrent) configurations to investigate the effect of pressure (30-100 kPa) on flame characteristics, such as spread rate and standoff distance. A small forced flow is induced upward so that the flames are exposed to a mixed (forced and free) flow. By reducing pressure, flames become less bright, their standoff distance increases, and their spread rates decrease similar to what is observed in low-gravity environments. These results could in help understanding the differences between flames spreading at low pressure and low gravity environments for these similar, yet very different, spreading configurations. They could also provide more information about potential Earth-based flammability testing of materials for spacecraft applications.

fire safety↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Opposed-flow Spreading Flames: Effect of Sub-atmospheric Pressure on Spread and Burning Rates

Flame spread over solid fuels is a canonical problem in fire science, due to its direct implications on material flammability and importance in fire development. Flames in a microgravity environment can behave very differently than on Earth, posing additional risks for spaceflight life safety. Sub-atmospheric pressures in ground-based experiments have been proposed to approximately replicate the burning behavior of solid fuels in reduced gravity conditions because of similar effects on heat and mass transfer mechanisms from the flame to the solid. In opposed-flow flame spread, the solid fuel is heated by the flame ahead of its leading edge, and this process is strongly affected by the ambient conditions. In this work, we consider flames spreading over flat thin acrylic samples exposed to a forced flow of 20 cm/s, and pressures between 30 and 100 kPa. When radiation losses and chemical kinetic effects are neglected, experimental and theoretical results suggest an independence of the spread rate on pressure. However, the spread rate shows a decreasing trend with lower pressure in the range 30-60 kPa. The mass burning rate, calculated from the samples weight measured before and after the experiments, shows a similar trend. The flame length, on the other hand, shows a non-monotonic behavior, reaching a maximum at 60 kPa. Additionally, gas emissions measured during the experiments are used to estimate the heat release rate of the spreading flames. The comparison of the heat release rate obtained from the measured emissions and the estimated mass burning rates, suggests that chemical kinetics is not driving the decrease in flame spread observed at low pressures, whereas radiation losses could be responsible in analogy to what has been observed in micro and partial gravity studies. These results could provide more information to guide future Earth-based material flammability testing for spacecraft applications.

fire↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Preliminary Results from the Saffire VI Experiment

Preliminary results are presented for one test of the last flight of the Spacecraft Fire Experiment (Saffire VI) which was conducted on an orbiting Cygnus spacecraft. These experiments directly address the risks associated with our understanding of spacecraft fire behavior at practical length scales and geometries. The lack of this experimental data has forced spacecraft designers to base their designs and safety precautions on 1-g understanding of flame spread, flame self-extinguishment, fire detection, and suppression. The Saffire experiment was developed by an international team of investigators with the goal of addressing open issues in spacecraft fire safety. NASA’s Spacecraft Fire Safety Demonstration Project was formulated with the goal of conducting a series of large-scale experiments in spacecraft environments that represent practical spacecraft fires. These tests spanned 1.5 to 3.2 kW with free air volumes of 17 to 19 cubic meters. The final flight in the series of six experiments examined concurrent spread over large samples (all 41 cm wide) including a thin sheet of flammable fuel (cotton/fiberglass 50 cm long); 2-sided spread over 1 cm thick polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (18 cm long); 1-sided spread over 0.5 cm thick (18 cm long); and Nomex fabric (7 cm long). Results are presented for the PMMA samples, the SIBAL sample, and the thin cotton samples from Saffire IV and V. The flame heat release is determined and compared to the overall temperature rise in the spacecraft and the change in the concentration of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in the spacecraft. Overall, the temperature and pressure rise in the spacecraft were found to be less significant than the increase in carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.

fire↗