Engineering topics

Galan, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Galan, A..

3 records

DOE OSTI2022

Gravitationally lensed quasars in Gaia – IV. 150 new lenses, quasar pairs, and projected quasars

ABSTRACT We report the spectroscopic follow-up of 175 lensed quasar candidates selected using Gaia Data Release 2 observations following Paper III of this series. Systems include 86 confirmed lensed quasars and a further 17 likely lensed quasars based on imaging and/or similar spectra. We also confirm 11 projected quasar pairs and 11 physical quasar pairs, while 25 systems are left as unclassified quasar pairs – pairs of quasars at the same redshift, which could be either distinct quasars or potential lensed quasars. Especially interesting objects include eight quadruply imaged quasars of which two have BAL sources, an apparent triple, and a doubly lensed LoBaL quasar. The source redshifts and image separations of these new lenses range between 0.65–3.59 and 0.78–6.23 arcsec, respectively. We compare the known population of lensed quasars to an updated mock catalogue at image separations between 1 and 4 arcsec, showing a very good match at z < 1.5. At z > 1.5, only 47 per cent of the predicted number are known, with 56 per cent of these missing lenses at image separations below 1.5 arcsec. The missing higher redshift, small-separation systems will have fainter lensing galaxies, and are partially explained by the unclassified quasar pairs and likely lenses presented in this work, which require deeper imaging. Of the 11 new reported projected quasar pairs, 5 have impact parameters below 10 kpc, almost tripling the number of such systems, which can probe the innermost regions of quasar host galaxies through absorption studies. We also report four new lensed galaxies discovered through our searches, with source redshifts ranging from 0.62 to 2.79.

Astronomy & Astrophysics↗

DOE OSTI2022

Search of strong lens systems in the Dark Energy Survey using convolutional neural networks

We present our search for strong lens, galaxy-scale systems in the first data release of the Dark Energy Survey (DES), based on a color-selected parent sample of 18 745 029 luminous red galaxies (LRGs). We used a convolutional neural network (CNN) to grade this LRG sample with values between 0 (non-lens) and 1 (lens). Our training set of mock lenses is data-driven, that is, it uses lensed sources taken from HST-COSMOS images and lensing galaxies from DES images of our LRG sample. A total of 76 582 cutouts were obtained with a score above 0.9, which were then visually inspected and classified into two catalogs. The first one contains 405 lens candidates, of which 90 present clear lensing features and counterparts, while the other 315 require more evidence, such as higher resolution imaging or spectra, to be conclusive. A total of 186 candidates are newly identified by our search, of which 16 are among the 90 most promising (best) candidates. The second catalog includes 539 ring galaxy candidates. This catalog will be a useful false positive sample for training future CNNs. For the 90 best lens candidates we carry out color-based deblending of the lens and source light without fitting any analytical profile to the data. This method is shown to be very efficient in the deblending, even for very compact objects and for objects with a complex morphology. Finally, from the 90 best lens candidates, we selected 52 systems with one single deflector to test an automated modeling pipeline that has the capacity to successfully model 79% of the sample within an acceptable computing runtime.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2022

TDCOSMO. IX. Systematic comparison between lens modelling software programs: time delay prediction for WGD 2038-4008

The importance of alternative methods for measuring the Hubble constant, such as time-delay cosmography, is highlighted by the recent Hubble tension. It is paramount to thoroughly investigate and rule out systematic biases in all measurement methods before we can accept new physics as the source of this tension. In this study, we perform a check for systematic biases in the lens modelling procedure of time-delay cosmography by comparing independent and blind time-delay predictions of the system WGD 2038-4008 from two teams using two different software programs: GLEE and LENSTRONOMY. The predicted time delays from the two teams incorporate the stellar kinematics of the deflector and the external convergence from line-of-sight structures. The un-blinded time-delay predictions from the two teams agree within 1.2σ, implying that once the time delay is measured the inferred Hubble constant will also be mutually consistent. However, there is a ~4σ discrepancy between the power-law model slope and external shear, which is a significant discrepancy at the level of lens models before the stellar kinematics and the external convergence are incorporated. We identify the difference in the reconstructed point spread function (PSF) to be the source of this discrepancy. When the same reconstructed PSF was used by both teams, we achieved excellent agreement, within ~0.6σ<, indicating that potential systematics stemming from source reconstruction algorithms and investigator choices are well under control. We recommend that future studies supersample the PSF as needed and marginalize over multiple algorithms or realizations for the PSF reconstruction to mitigate the systematics associated with the PSF. A future study will measure the time delays of the system WGD 2038-4008 and infer the Hubble constant based on our mass models.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗