Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Fu-lung Chang

Publications and source records attributed to Fu-lung Chang.

TPSAS-NF1676L-13135-DND

Aircraft Icing - Aircraft structures act as ice nuclei in supercooled clouds - ice collects, weight increases, plane falls - Pilots need to know where and when icing can occur - PIREPS are first order: sparse, aircraft dependent, location uncertain - Model analyses and forecasts: freezing levels, cloud expectations - radar => precipitation - All combined in NCAR/FAA/NOAA/NASA program to provide Current Icing Product (CIP) & Forecast Icing product (FIP) analyses to pilots (CONUS) - some inadequacies remain - NWP uncertainties, intensity, altitude of icing, etc. - Operational satellites can add valuable information - indirectly: input of cloud properties to CIP & NWP - directly: determination of icing threat from real time satellite data

William L Smith↗

Development of a Consistent MODIS and VIIRS Cloud Detection Approach for CERES

A consistent cloud fraction record across various satellite platforms is essential for maintaining a long-term and stable climate data record of Earth's energy budget. With the Aqua satellite nearing the end of its operational lifetime, the continuation of this record relies on utilizing VIIRS observations from NOAA20 for cloud detection in NASA’s Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) project. However, integrating data from VIIRS and MODIS instruments poses challenges due to their distinct characteristics, such as varying spatial resolutions and different spectral channels. As a result, deriving consistent cloud properties from these two sensors without introducing artificial discontinuities in the time series remains a complex and challenging task. This paper will present progress toward developing a unified MODIS and VIIRS cloud mask using common channels to produce consistent cloud properties for CERES next edition (Ed5) Earth radiation budget data products. The fundamental approach taken in the CERES cloud mask is to compare the observed radiances to the expected background clear sky radiances. Therefore, one vital step is to compute clear sky radiances with a radiative transfer model that accurately accounts for satellite-specific, spectrally dependent surface reflectance, surface emission, and atmospheric absorption. Refined radiative transfer models and updated ancillary data inputs including surface emissivity maps, IGBP, snow and ice maps are incorporated into the processing framework to improve cloud detection consistency and accuracy. Pixel level cloud mask results and monthly global cloud fraction comparisons between MODIS and VIIRS will be presented to evaluate their consistency. Remaining challenges will be discussed. It is expected that this work will contribute consistent cloud properties for CERES that adequately bridges the MODIS and VIIRS imager data records.

CERES↗

A 3-Channel Algorithm for Retrieving Spatially and Temporally Continuous Cloud Properties Across Different Geostationary Satellite Imagers

Cloud property retrieval algorithms for passive satellite imagers are generally designed to take advantage of all the useful spectral information available for a particular satellite. This strategy optimizes accuracy and reduces misidentification and retrieval biases, particularly for modern satellites with many spectral channels. However, the application of dissimilar algorithms tailored for different satellite sensor scan present a problem within the climate data record (CDR). Algorithm inconsistencies can introduce artificial trends in the CDR that are tied to instrument changes rather than physical changes, especially when older satellites with limited spectral information are included. The NASA CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System) data record provides global cloud property retrievals across 23 years and more than 25 satellites. With the goal of producing a spatially and temporally continuous record of cloud properties, the CERES cloud working group has developed algorithms that use only 3 channels that are common to most geostationary satellite imagers: 0.65, 3.9, and 10.8 μm.

Sarah Bedka↗