Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Freuler, R. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Freuler, R. J..

Modeling techniques for transonic airfoils

In the present comparative study of computer codes for the modeling of two-dimensional, single element airfoil sections for various section geometry classes, two of the codes use vortex singularities methods to obtain the potential flow solution while the remainder solve the full inviscid potential flow equations by means of finite differencing techniques that allow results to be obtained for transonic flow about an airfoil which includes weak shocks. Computational results are presented for a symmetrical airfoil section, a conventional section, and a supercritical one. Icing condition applications of the models are noted. The model codes' range of applicability and agreement with each other and experimental results, as well as their computer run times and memory requirements, are noted.

Petrie, S. L.↗

An evaluation of four single element airfoil analytic methods

A comparison of four computer codes for the analysis of two-dimensional single element airfoil sections is presented for three classes of section geometries. Two of the computer codes utilize vortex singularities methods to obtain the potential flow solution. The other two codes solve the full inviscid potential flow equation using finite differencing techniques, allowing results to be obtained for transonic flow about an airfoil including weak shocks. Each program incorporates boundary layer routines for computing the boundary layer displacement thickness and boundary layer effects on aerodynamic coefficients. Computational results are given for a symmetrical section represented by an NACA 0012 profile, a conventional section illustrated by an NACA 65A413 profile, and a supercritical type section for general aviation applications typified by a NASA LS(1)-0413 section. The four codes are compared and contrasted in the areas of method of approach, range of applicability, agreement among each other and with experiment, individual advantages and disadvantages, computer run times and memory requirements, and operational idiosyncrasies.

Freuler, R. J.↗