Freeman, Jacob | Engineering Papers

DOE OSTI2023

A streamlined approach to characterize microalgae strains for biomass productivity under dynamic climate simulation conditions

Screening microalgae strains under static light and temperature flask conditions cannot directly quantify the biomass productivities of algae growing in the dynamically fluctuating light and temperature conditions of outdoor ponds. In this effort, we describe a testing pipeline that screens for productivity under climate simulated conditions. A validated, miniaturized Laboratory Environmental Algae Pond Simulator (mini-LEAPS) photobioreactor was used to determine optimal medium salinities and biomass productivities of cold-tolerant microalgae collected from Arctic, subarctic, Antarctic, and subalpine habitats. Strains characterized in this effort include: Chlorella antarctica UTEX1959, Chlorella sp. UTEXSNO69, Chloromonas rosae UTEXSNO11, Phaeodactylum tricornutum UTEX646, and Stichococcus minutus CCALA727. Observed productivities of the characterized strains ranged from 1.74 ± 0.25 to 8.18 ± 0.81 g m –2 day –1 (as ash-free dry weight). For each strain, a temperature tolerance profile was generated to identify the most appropriate season (s) for cultivation. The two most promising strains, Chlorella sp. UTEX SNO69 and P. tricornutum UTEX646, were tested alongside the DISCOVR winter benchmark strain Monoraphidium minutum 26B-AM in outdoor open ponds at the PNNL Algae Testbed (PAT) in Arizona. Further, under cold-season outdoor pond conditions, Chlorella sp. UTEXSNO69 achieved average areal biomass productivities of 8.21 ± 0.50 g m –2 day –1 , not significantly different from that of the benchmark strain (8.52 ± 0.43 g m –2 day –1 , p > 0.05). Under spring outdoor pond conditions, P. tricornutum UTEX646 achieved average areal biomass productivities 10.34 ± 0.27 g m –2 day –1 , not significantly different from that of the benchmark (10.07 ± 0.50 g m –2 day –1 ) under the tested conditions (p > 0.05). The streamlined pipeline was thus demonstrated to successfully characterize productive microalgae strains for outdoor deployment by weeding out algae strains that were not productive under the tested dynamic light and temperature conditions.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2023

DISCOVR strain pipeline screening – Part I: Maximum specific growth rate as a function of temperature and salinity for 38 candidate microalgae for biofuels production

Here, to identify high productivity strains for microalgal biofuels generation, the maximum specific growth rate of 38 strains was measured as a function of salinity (i.e., 5, 15, and 35 PSU) and temperature (i.e., at 8 temperatures along a linear gradient from ca. 5 to 45°C) to determine the most suitable growth medium salinity and best growing season, respectively, for outdoor raceway pond cultivation. The following strains were evaluated: Agmenellum quadruplicatum UTEX 2268, Anabaena sp. ATCC 33081, Arthrospira fusiformis UTEX 2721, Arthrospira platensis UTEX 3086, Chlorella vulgaris NREL 4-C12, Chlorella autotrophica CCMP 243, Chlorella sorokiniana DOE1044, Chlorella sorokiniana DOE 1116, Chlorella sorokiniana DOE 1412 (UTEXB3016), Chlorella vulgaris LRB AZ-1201, Chlorococcum littorale UTEX 117, Chlorococcum sp. UTEX-B P7, Chloromonas reticulata CCALA 870, Coelastrella sp. DOE 0202, Cyanobacterium sp. AB1, Micractinium reisseri NREL 14-F2, Microchloropsis gaditana CCMP1894, Microchloropsis salina CCMP 1776, Monoraphidium sp. MONOR1, Monoraphidium minutum 26B-AM, Nannochloropsis oceanica CCAP 849/10, Oscillatoria cf. priestleyi CCMEE 5020.1-1, Picochlorum celeri TG2-WT-CSM/EMRE, Picochlorum oklahomensis CCMP 2329, Picochlorum renovo NREL 39-A8, Picochlorum soloecismus DOE 101, Porphyridium cruentum CCMP 675, Scenedesmus acutus LRB-AP-0401, Scenedesmus obliquus DOE 0152.z, Scenedesmus obliquus UTEX393,Scenedesmus rubescens NREL 46B-D3, Scenedesmus sp. IITRIND2, Stichococcus minor CCMP 819, Stichococcus minutus CCALA 727, Synechococcus elongatus UTEX2973.1, Tetraselmis striata LANL 1001, Tisochrysis lutea CCMP 1324, and Tribonema minus UTEXB3156. For each strain, the identity and the presence of bacterial cohorts was determined using 18S and 16S rDNA sequencing, respectively. The maximum specific growth rate versus temperature data were also used to determine the activation energies (Arrhenius equation) for most strains. For all strains, the measured salinity and temperature tolerance data were compared to those reported in the literature. The fastest growing strains were down-selected for subsequent biomass productivity measurements in climate-simulation photobioreactors, as reported in the next paper in the issue.

18S and 16S rDNA sequencing↗