Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Foster, Charles J.

Publications and source records attributed to Foster, Charles J..

Comparative study of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with kinetic models at genome-scale

The parameterization of kinetic models requires measurement of fluxes and/or metabolite levels for a base strain and a few genetic perturbations thereof. Unlike stoichiometric models that are mostly invariant to the specific strain, it remains unclear whether kinetic models constructed for different strains of the same species have similar or significantly different kinetic parameters. This important question underpins the applicability range and prediction limits of kinetic reconstructions. To this end, herein we parameterize two separate large-scale kinetic models using K-FIT with genome-wide coverage corresponding to two distinct strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: CEN.PK 113-7D strain (model k-sacce306-CENPK), and growth-deficient BY4741 (isogenic to S288c; model k-sacce306-BY4741). The metabolic network for each model contains 306 reactions, 230 metabolites, and 119 substrate-level regulatory interactions. The two models (for CEN.PK and BY4741) recapitulate, within one standard deviation, 77% and 75% of the fitted dataset fluxes, respectively, determined by 13 C metabolic flux analysis for wild-type and eight single-gene knockout mutants of each strain. Strain-specific kinetic parameterization results indicate that key enzymes in the TCA cycle, glycolysis, and arginine and proline metabolism drive the metabolic differences between these two strains of S. cerevisiae. Our results suggest that although kinetic models cannot be readily used across strains as stoichiometric models, they can capture species-specific information through the kinetic parameterization process.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Building kinetic models for metabolic engineering

Kinetic formalisms of metabolism link metabolic fluxes to enzyme levels, metabolite concentrations and their allosteric regulatory interactions. Though they require the identification of physiologically relevant values for numerous parameters, kinetic formalisms uniquely establish a mechanistic link across heterogeneous omics datasets and provide an overarching vantage point to effectively inform metabolic engineering strategies. Advances in computational power, gene annotation coverage, and formalism standardization have led to significant progress over the past few years. However, careful interpretation of model predictions, limited metabolic flux datasets, and assessment of parameter sensitivity remain as challenges. In this study we highlight fundamental considerations which influence model quality and prediction, advances in methodologies, and success stories of deploying kinetic models to guide metabolic engineering.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Recent advances in constraint and machine learning-based metabolic modeling by leveraging stoichiometric balances, thermodynamic feasibility and kinetic law formalisms

Understanding the governing principles behind organisms’ metabolism and growth underpins their effective deployment as bioproduction chassis. A central objective of metabolic modeling is predicting how metabolism and growth are affected by both external environmental factors and internal genotypic perturbations. The fundamental concepts of reaction stoichiometry, thermodynamics, and mass action kinetics have emerged as the foundational principles of many modeling frameworks designed to describe how and why organisms allocate resources towards both growth and bioproduction. Furthermore, this review focuses on the latest algorithmic advancements that have integrated these foundational principles into increasingly sophisticated quantitative frameworks.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗