Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Flynn, Connor

Publications and source records attributed to Flynn, Connor.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Eastern North Atlantic (ENA) Aerosol Supplementary Site (S1) Data Analysis Report

We present strategies to identify time periods when local aerosol sources impact the data collected at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility in the Eastern North Atlantic (ENA). Data from the aerosol observing system (AOS) at the Central Facility and a temporary aerosol Supplementary Site (S1) were evaluated. S1 instrumentation was deployed within 0.75 km of the ENA Central Facility (C1) for approximately one year. Two time periods, one during the summer and one during the winter, were examined in support of the Aerosol and Cloud Experiments in the Eastern North Atlantic (ACE-ENA) intensive operating periods (IOPs) in 2017 and 2018. As the criteria for identifying regionally representative data varies based on the specific needs of the user, we present and discuss different strategies using measured aerosol properties and their associated meteorological parameters to isolate periods in AOS data that were impacted by local aerosol at ENA. We identify high-concentration aerosol events at ENA using submicron number concentrations, size distributions, high-time-resolution measurements, and diurnal profiles. An improved understanding of local aerosol to select the optimal aerosol mask was obtained with an understanding of local meteorology during the different seasons. We developed a mathematical algorithm that employs AOS data to mask high-concentration aerosol events at ENA. We validated the ENA Aerosol Mask with aerosol data from C1 and S1 and associated meteorological data. The Supplementary Site was ideal to understand and constrain local aerosol sources within the region. In its absence, collocated data from the ENA AOS could be used to select appropriate parameters to develop an aerosol mask that would limit over- or underestimating the regional baseline aerosol data. When available, associated metadata, such as airport flight logs and visual identification with AOS cameras should also be used to validate the application of an aerosol mask at a new site. Our results confirm the importance of optimizing an aerosol mask prior its application. In the future, the application of an aerosol mask at ARM observatories and during mobile deployments could be used to increase the data quality of continuous AOS data and to reduce uncertainties when parameterizing regional aerosol processes and impacts on clouds for incorporation in models.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2019

Intercomparison of biomass burning aerosol optical properties from in situ and remote-sensing instruments in ORACLES-2016

The total effect of aerosols, both directly and on cloud properties, remains the biggest source of uncertainty in anthropogenic radiative forcing on the climate. Correct characterization of intensive aerosol optical properties, particularly in conditions where absorbing aerosol is present, is a crucial factor in quantifying these effects. The southeast Atlantic Ocean (SEA), with seasonal biomass burning smoke plumes overlying and mixing with a persistent stratocumulus cloud deck, offers an excellent natural laboratory to make the observations necessary to understand the complexities of aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions. The first field deployment of the NASA ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) campaign was conducted in September of 2016 out of Walvis Bay, Namibia. Data collected during ORACLES-2016 are used to derive aerosol properties from an unprecedented number of simultaneous measurement techniques over this region. Here, we present results from six of the eight independent instruments or instrument combinations, all applied to measure or retrieve aerosol absorption and single-scattering albedo. Most but not all of the biomass burning aerosol was located in the free troposphere, in relative humidities typically ranging up to 60%. We present the single-scattering albedo (SSA), absorbing and total aerosol optical depth (AAOD and AOD), and absorption, scattering, and extinction Ångström exponents (AAE, SAE, and EAE, respectively) for specific case studies looking at near-coincident and near-colocated measurements from multiple instruments, and SSAs for the broader campaign average over the month-long deployment. For the case studies, we find that SSA agrees within the measurement uncertainties between multiple instruments, though, over all cases, there is no strong correlation between values reported by one instrument and another. We also find that agreement between the instruments is more robust at higher aerosol loading (AOD 400 > 0.4 ).The campaign-wide average and range shows differences in the values measured by each instrument. We find the ORACLES-2016 campaign-average SSA at 500 > nm (SSA 500 ) to be between 0.85 and 0.88, depending on the instrument considered (4STAR, AirMSPI, or in situ measurements), with the interquartile ranges for all instruments between 0.83 and 0.89. This is consistent with previous September values reported over the region (between 0.84 and 0.90 for SSA at 550nm). The results suggest that the differences observed in the campaign-average values may be dominated by instrument-specific spatial sampling differences and the natural physical variability in aerosol conditions over the SEA, rather than fundamental methodological differences.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2018

aafpsap.a1

AAF PSAP a1 datastream

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2018

aafneph.a1

AAF Neph aafneph.a1

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2018

First ARM Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor Users’ Meeting Report

The first U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) users’ meeting was held on April 11-13, 2017, at Aerodyne Research, Inc. in Billerica, Massachusetts, to discuss the Southern Great Plains (SGP) atmospheric observatory ACSM data quality and establish best practices for data collection and processing. The participants examined six years of calibration and processed data. Specific issues raised by data users were addressed and case studies from two field experiments were examined. The most recent data from the ACSM installed in the newly commissioned SGP ARM Mobile Facility 7 (AMF7) were also evaluated. The participants recommended that the SGP ACSM data be reprocessed using calibration values averaged over the history of SGP ACSM calibrations. They also recommended that the data quality be evaluated by comparing (1) observed versus predicted particulate ammonium (NH 4 + ) mass loadings, and (2) ACSM mass loadings versus mass loadings calculated from particle size and light scattering data. The contents of the datastreams from the ACSM were defined based on ARM requirements and the necessary tasks to implement these recommendations were assigned to the mentor and the instrument manufacturer. Some of the recommendations were implemented for the SGP data and are presented in this report. Data from two ARM sites located in marine environments were also analyzed. These analyses as well as instrument intercomparisons have led to further questions about data treatment. These will be addresses in the second users’ meeting scheduled for the summer of 2018.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2018

A Closure Study of Total Scattering Using Airborne In Situ Measurements from the Winter Phase of TCAP

We examine the performance of our approach for calculating the total scattering coefficient of both non-absorbing and absorbing aerosol at ambient conditions from aircraft data. Our extended examination involves airborne in situ data collected by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Gulf Stream 1 aircraft during winter over Cape Cod and the western North Atlantic Ocean as part of the Two-Column Aerosol Project (TCAP). The particle population represented by the winter dataset, in contrast with its summer counterpart, contains more hygroscopic particles and particles with an enhanced ability to absorb sunlight due to the larger fraction of black carbon. Moreover, the winter observations are characterized by more frequent clouds and a larger fraction of super-micron particles. We calculate model total scattering coefficient at ambient conditions using size spectra measured by optical particle counters (OPCs) and ambient complex refractive index (RI) estimated from measured chemical composition and relative humidity (RH). We demonstrate that reasonable agreement (~20% on average) between the observed and calculated scattering can be obtained under subsaturated ambient conditions (RH < 80%) by applying both screening for clouds and chemical composition data for the RI-based correction of the OPC-derived size spectra.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2018

First ARM Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor Users’ Meeting Report

The first U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) users’ meeting was held on April 11-13, 2017, at Aerodyne Research, Inc. in Billerica, Massachusetts, to discuss the Southern Great Plains (SGP) atmospheric observatory ACSM data quality and establish best practices for data collection and processing. The participants examined six years of calibration and processed data. Specific issues raised by data users were addressed and case studies from two field experiments were examined. The most recent data from the ACSM installed in the newly commissioned SGP ARM Mobile Facility 7 (AMF7) were also evaluated. The participants recommended that the SGP ACSM data be reprocessed using calibration values averaged over the history of SGP ACSM calibrations. They also recommended that the data quality be evaluated by comparing (1) observed versus predicted particulate ammonium (NH4+) mass loadings, and (2) ACSM mass loadings versus mass loadings calculated from particle size and light scattering data. The contents of the datastreams from the ACSM were defined based on ARM requirements and the necessary tasks to implement these recommendations were assigned to the mentor and the instrument manufacturer. Some of the recommendations were implemented for the SGP data and are presented in this report. Data from two ARM sites located in marine environments were also analyzed. These analyses as well as instrument intercomparisons have led to further questions about data treatment. These will be addresses in the second users’ meeting scheduled for the summer of 2018.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2018

First ARM Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor Users’ Meeting Report

The first U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) users’ meeting was held on April 11-13, 2017, at Aerodyne Research, Inc. in Billerica, Massachusetts, to discuss the Southern Great Plains (SGP) atmospheric observatory ACSM data quality and establish best practices for data collection and processing. The participants examined six years of calibration and processed data. Specific issues raised by data users were addressed and case studies from two field experiments were examined. The most recent data from the ACSM installed in the newly commissioned SGP ARM Mobile Facility 7 (AMF7) were also evaluated. The participants recommended that the SGP ACSM data be reprocessed using calibration values averaged over the history of SGP ACSM calibrations. They also recommended that the data quality be evaluated by comparing (1) observed versus predicted particulate ammonium (NH 4 + ) mass loadings, and (2) ACSM mass loadings versus mass loadings calculated from particle size and light scattering data. The contents of the datastreams from the ACSM were defined based on ARM requirements and the necessary tasks to implement these recommendations were assigned to the mentor and the instrument manufacturer. Some of the recommendations were implemented for the SGP data and are presented in this report. Data from two ARM sites located in marine environments were also analyzed. These analyses as well as instrument intercomparisons have led to further questions about data treatment. These will be addresses in the second users’ meeting scheduled for the summer of 2018.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2018

ARM Aerosol Measurement Plan

Over the past decade, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility has been working toward developing a comprehensive (defined here as Tiers I-III in Appendix A) and consistent set of aerosol measurements across each of the ARM ground-based observatories. Along the way, the facility has deployed wide-ranging instruments including some for which ARM has had many years of operating experience and some which represent more cutting-edge capabilities. While there has been a clear motivation for this instrument suite, the adoption of these instruments has not been uniform. The reasons for this vary and include operational challenges, measurement complexity, and alignment with active research.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2018

The Ascension Island boundary layer in the remote southeast Atlantic is often smoky

Observations from June through October, 2016, from a surface-based ARM Mobile Facility deployment on Ascension Island (8°S, 14.5°W) indicate that refractory black carbon (rBC) is almost always present within the boundary layer. rBC mass concentrations, light absorption coefficients, and cloud condensation nuclei concentrations vary in concert and synoptically, peaking in August. Light absorption coefficients at three visible wavelengths as a function of rBC mass indirectly indicate the presence of other light-absorbing aerosols (e.g., brown carbon), most pronounced in June. The single-scattering-albedo increases systematically from August to October in both 2016 and 2017, with monthly-means of 0.78±0.02 (August), 0.81±0.03 (September) and 0.83±0.03 (October) at the green wavelength. Boundary-layer aerosol loadings are only loosely correlated with total aerosol optical depth, with smoke more likely to be present in the boundary layer earlier in the biomass-burning season, evolving to smoke predominantly present above the cloud layers in September-October, typically resting upon the cloud-top inversion. The time period with the campaign-maximum near-surface light absorption and column aerosol optical depth, on 13-16 August of 2016, is investigated further. Also, backtrajectories indicate more direct boundary layer transport westward from the African continent is central to explaining the elevated surface aerosol loadings.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗
DOE OSTI2018

Translator Plan: A Coordinated Vision for Fiscal Years 2018-2020

In June of 2017, the Translator Group met to develop this coordinated three-year vision plan, incorporating key feedback and aligning to ARM’s mission priorities. This plan responds to a shift in how we determine our priorities, given the new needs of the ARM Facility. In the past, individual Translators have determined priorities in conversation with individual DOE Atmospheric System Research (ASR) working groups. To better support ARM’s Decadal Vision (https://www.arm.gov/publications/programdocs/doe-sc-arm-14-029.pdf), however, the Translator Group is instead developing a coordinated response to needs from our user community to better balance resources and skills among participants. This approach agrees with direction from ARM leadership and the ARM-ASR Coordination Team (AACT). To develop this plan the Translator Group reviewed feedback received from the User Executive Committee (UEC) and the Triennial Review, as well as priorities from ASR working groups and Principal Investigators (PIs), the LES ARM Symbiotic Simulation and Observation (LASSO) project, and new instrumentation and activities as described by the ARM Technical Director. In particular, we are responding to the advice that we were trying to do too much, and should focus on providing additional support to data quality, uncertainty assessment, a timeline for producing core VAPs from ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) campaigns, and supporting key aspects of the Decadal Vision.

value-added products, User Executive Committee, AR↗
DOE OSTI2018

Absorption at San Antonio with 3-Wavelength Photo Acoustic Soot Spectrometer, Tricolor Absorption Photometer (ASAPT) Field Campaign Report

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5; particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5μm and smaller) samples were collected at the University of Texas, San Antonio (UTSA) campus (29.57901, -98.62889) from May 15-30. An additional measurement at the UTSA site included aerosol absorption coefficient of PM1 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 1.0μm and smaller) using a tricolor absorption photometer (TAP) (Brechtel Mfg. Inc., Hayward, California). The sampling site is approximately 15 miles northwest of downtown San Antonio and in close proximity to major highway 10 and is just south of a forested area. The setup of the sampler and TAP and collection of PM2.5 samples were completed by Baylor University’s graduate student, Subin Yoon. Three three-wavelength photoacoustic soot spectrometers (PASS-3s) were shipped to San Antonio for testing and possible data collection. R. Subramanian went to San Antonio to lead this effort with assistance from Yoon. Each instrument had a critical flaw that inhibited its use for this campaign. Two instruments had low laser power for each wavelength; in addition, there were power and overheating issues with the one instrument that was installed on a test basis. The third instrument had computer issues that impeded any testing. In short, these three instruments would require a major overhaul in terms of lasers and computer systems to be brought back to field capability. As a result, the filter-based optical measurements were added to the campaign as an alternate measurement that would provide mass absorption efficiency at a single wavelength, but no scattering measurement. The TAP instrument was successfully installed and collected data for San Antonio, but full use of the data would have required a co-located scattering measurement. This campaign was co-located with a Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) ozone field study. That TCEQ field study was a collaboration of the University of Houston (PI James Flynn), Rice University (Co-PI Robert Griffen), and Baylor University (Co-PIs Rebecca Sheesley and Sascha Usenko).

aerosols, tricolor absorption photometer, three-wa↗
DOE OSTI2017

AIP1OGREN: Aerosol Observing Station Intensive Properties Value-Added Product

The aip1ogren value-added product (VAP) computes several aerosol intensive properties. It requires as input calibrated, corrected, aerosol extensive properties (scattering and absorption coefficients, primarily) from the Aerosol Observing Station (AOS). Aerosol extensive properties depend on both the nature of the aerosol and the amount of the aerosol. We compute several properties as relationships between the various extensive properties. These intensive properties are independent of aerosol amount and instead relate to intrinsic properties of the aerosol itself. Along with the original extensive properties we report aerosol single-scattering albedo, hemispheric backscatter fraction, asymmetry parameter, and Ångström exponent for scattering and absorption with one-minute averaging. An hourly averaged file is produced from the 1-minute files that includes all extensive and intensive properties as well as submicron scattering and submicron absorption fractions. Finally, in both the minutely and hourly files the aerosol radiative forcing efficiency is provided.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗